Mike Lipper's Blog

Is History Rhyming Again? - Weekly Blog # 934

2026-03-29T20:17:00.003-04:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Is History Rhyming Again?

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Preface

Before the New Jersey Symphony’s inspirational playing of Beethoven’s Pastoral Symphony there was a brief concert by the New Jersey Symphony Youth Orchestra’s Academy Orchestra, who are gifted and wonderful. However, what was more wonderful was thinking that these talented young people not only learned their musical skills very well but also learned a bit of the history and discipline of classical music. Hopefully, it will give them the skills to manage the messed-up world we are passing on to them.

I couldn’t help my own burdened brain sitting there Friday night after what may have been the most important stock market week in some time. The Standard & Poor’s 500 pierced the low set in September. Classically trained market analysts will likely suggest how difficult it will be for this most important of all indicators to quickly recover the 10% loss from its high point. Pundits will likely blame the current military and diplomatic failures to end the war.

Those in leadership positions are not paying attention to ancient history. Iran is the modern name of what was called Persia for centuries. The rulers of Persia controlled much of what passed through the “silk road”, which not only passed new foods to the western world but also mathematics, science, paper money, and gun powder. Persia had a large and powerful army that kept would be conquerors away, although it was not particularly successful at adding to its piece of the Asian land mass.

I believe the main threat to the US and other countries is not their incipient nuclear warfare, but their successful sponsorship of proxies who damage other established governments and societies through the destruction of people and property. Recently, the US experienced a couple of wanton killings carried out by US citizens who received local training and support. We have seen the Iranians do this not only here, but in the UK, Europe, Middle East, and Africa. Because their sleeper cells easily entered the US through an open border, we don’t exactly know the size and capability of the problem.

The US has a history of winning wars and losing the peace because we are not very good as occupiers. Also, it is worth pointing out that Iran has never successfully been occupied by foreigners. In my opinion, the dream of a fully formed new government structure for the country appears naïve.

In exposing the problems which led to the market drop, we need to address an approximately 100-year period of excessive debt creation and the confusion between a top-down education and a bottom-up learning process.

This Week & Beyond

We got one violent rally this past week and could get one or more this coming week because a gap opened between the S&P 500 and NASDAQ on Friday. The gap must normally be filled before a sustained move can occur. Friday can perhaps be summed up in three numbers:

S&P 500 -1.67%
Price of oil +7.07%
ECRI industrial prices rallied again to the 130 level, putting the year-over-year gain at +9.25%

In the first three days of the week there was a positive tone to US stock prices, but they were swamped with declines in the last two days, putting the SWX down for five straight weeks and on Friday it fell below its September returns.

The declines appeared to be coming from retail-oriented accounts, many of which were housed at large retail brokerage firms years ago. Coincidentally, both the number of listed stocks and the number of primary retail brokerage firms significantly declined during this period. They were replaced by larger more diversified firms whose brokers switched from commissions to fees, making them look more like “wealth managers”. However, many of them are still short-term oriented and prefer stock exchange listed securities for their accounts. Most of these new recruits to the business have not experienced a full economic recession and very few investors or investment committee members have any direct experience with depressions.

The latter point, in my opinion, is causing great risk to the market, not that I can estimate the starting date of a new depression. However, as someone who has studied old races and other ancient track conditions, I am conscious that bad things do happen. Thus, I feel a need when examining investment possibilities to include an alternative negative future in reviewing future strategies. There are not many investors or advisers who do.

Most down markets, but not all, are caused by a forced repayment of debt at an inappropriate time, like in William Shakespeare’s “The Merchant of Venice”, or in margin calls. We may be due for such a period!! Coming out of the expansion of most global economies after WWI in the nineteen twenties, there was a ballooning of debt creation. Borrowing against securities became popular with retail investors in the US and other countries, particularly by those of the farm community in the US. By the late 1920s, many US farmers, merchants, suppliers, and local small banks were heavily in debt, with their crops and land used as collateral. When the price for domestic crops was impacted by lower-priced foreign competition, it led to dire conditions. They appealed to their congressmen for help in putting tariffs on incoming food items and they convinced a reluctant President to enact The Smoot-Hawley tariffs, causing foreign governments to respond in kind. This led to the disruption of global trade, which was one of the initial causes of the recession. The recession was turned into a depression by a new government which needed a ten-year long depression and a new World War to pull us out of this self-administered trouble. I AM NOT PREDICTING THIS, BUT I AM SAYING WE SHOULD CONSIDER IT A REAL POSSIBILITY.

Caution: As these worries are disturbing, they should not be discarded, even though none of us wish they come to be. However, prudence requires that they should be examined regularly to see ensure their chance of occurring stays small and doesn’t creep up to a higher probability. The odds still favor expansion.

Please share your views which can help us.

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bifocal Analysis: Short & Long-Term - Weekly Blog # 933

Mike Lipper's Blog: This week’s Dichotomy/Bifocals Needed - Weekly Blog # 932

Mike Lipper's Blog: Premature: Buying Program to Begin Soon? - Weekly Blog # 931

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Comments

Comments

Bifocal Analysis: Short & Long-Term - Weekly Blog # 933

2026-03-22T18:51:00.000-04:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Bifocal Analysis: Short & Long-Term

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Short-Term

The data is so negative that brief and violent rallies are to be expected. Net stock selling has consistently outpaced buying for each of the last four weeks. For example, 85% of the NYSE stocks and 81% of NASDAQ stocks fell in the latest week. As Barron’s noted “cash is looking more appealing since stock market hedges, bonds, and gold are no longer working.” Employers are barely replacing the more expensive retiring labor in most manufacturing functions.

There is a new player in the game, private credit. For the most part issuers of private credit instruments don’t qualify for bank loans, and they don’t have long credit histories either. Much of this paper is held in new funds, which are being sold to retail channels. When one of these loans gets in trouble it is referred to as a “cockroach”. Jaime Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan Chase (*) warned that where there is one “cockroach” there is likely to be more.

(*) JPM shares are owned in managed accounts.

Market analysts are concerned that the S&P 500 Index has been locked in a narrow 300-point band for the last four months, with optimists and pessimist exchanging positions. This week, the lower boundary line was briefly pierced. If the “500” drops 3% more, then the 400-point range will become a difficult region for the market to rise beyond for quite a period. This fear may briefly spark some rallies from the derivative and short players.

Longer-Term Implications of History

One purpose of recorded history is to explain what happened, at least in the eyes of the winning survivors. The survivors, or their intellectual heirs, construct rules as to why certain actions are repeated. If there are enough repetitions the rules become dictum, even though the battle conditions are different. We are taught from a very early age to follow rules without an understanding of the conditions that created them. This blind acceptance of rules has led to occasional great mistakes in politics, the military, sports, families, business, and of course investing. Historic labels often become shorthand for rules. For instance: Adam and Eve, George Washington, the NY Yankees, Democrats, Republicans, Chopin, etc.

As has been noted before, I learned basic analysis at the NY racetracks. One great lesson from racing lore was Man of War, which had 25 winning races in a row but lost his last race to an unknown horse named Upstart. Proving unexpected things can and occasionally do happen. My self-appointed task at the track was to guess the chance of the unexpected happening.

Applying the racetrack experience to investing I looked at the historical record of Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger for stocks and companies in which to invest. In an oversimplification there were at least three characteristics the winners had in common, the nature of customers, the characteristics of the workforce, and the discipline of integrity. (I suspect the last was penned by his long-term counsel and director Ron Olson, a fellow ex-trustee of Caltech.)

If the US stock market does decline materially in the period ahead, I will try to apply the track lessons learned. Charlie Munger taught Warren Buffett it was better to buy a good company at a reasonable price and not wait for a cheap price. For many years there were great companies we didn’t own because they were selling way above a reasonable price. I expect a number of these “beauties” will be available at reasonable prices during the next depression.

Next Depression

I don’t know when it will happen but based on human nature, I expect it to happen. The US has had only four Presidents that were restructurers: Andrew Jackson, Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, and Trump. Below are some parallels to the 1930-1942 depression:

Each challenged the constitution and fought with the courts
Weakened the controls on the banks
Set the stage for war
Weakened the currency
Encouraged the retail public to invest in speculative vehicles
Changed how the US was governed
All Presidents, except Andrew Jackson, were involved with Japan

No historical comparison is identical, and the future may be different than the past, but odds favor a closer similarity.

Please share your views, there is much to learn.

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: This week’s Dichotomy/Bifocals Needed - Weekly Blog # 932

Mike Lipper's Blog: Premature: Buying Program to Begin Soon? - Weekly Blog # 931

Mike Lipper's Blog: Expectations Changing? - Weekly Blog # 930

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Comments

Comments

This week’s Dichotomy/Bifocals Needed - Weekly Blog # 932

2026-03-15T17:30:00.004-04:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

This week’s Dichotomy/Bifocals Needed

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

1 week = 1 month, or 1 or more years

From this investor’s viewpoint, the previous five trading days could be seen as a great dichotomy. Seventy seven percent of NYSE stock prices declined and 66% of NASDAQ stocks. Additionally, the US dollar rose in price to 100.362 on Friday from 97.70 on Thursday!!

The stock price decline was supported by a sharply increased bearish reading in the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey looking 6-months ahead, which rose to 46.4% from 35.5% the prior week. There was only a slight fall in the bullish six-month prediction which fell to 31.9% from 33.1% the prior week. Large publicly traded companies continued to report little to no hiring to offset those retiring.

One might have thought that worries about inflation would have had more impact, with the ECRI industrial price indicator rising to 130.99% from 126% the prior week. The index was up 9.59% for the last 12 months, but that didn’t seem to retard the jump in the dollar on Friday.

If one listened to the advocates of The President, the move in Friday’s dollar pointed to good times ahead. Other factors they mentioned were part of the reason the majority sold stocks this week, including on the last day of the week. We therefore have a dichotomy, which is a condition that can’t last or perhaps requires a different analysis?

The correct analysis is a condition that possibly occurs to seniors. That is the need to get corrective eyewear (glasses or implants). Perhaps we need to use one set of lenses for short distances and one for long or perhaps use bifocals.

We could be drawing close to the time when we will know whether the short-term optimistic view or the longer-term more pessimistic view followed by optimism is correct.

Watch the S&P 500

There are four major US stock market indices quoted in the press. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) consists of just 30 stocks weighted by their stock prices, whereast he Standard & Poor’s 500 is weighted by market capitalization. The NASDAQ Composite is also capitalization weighted of about 500 stocks, although some stocks don’t have public records for five and ten years. The Russell 2000 Index is small-cap focused and suffers from a significant number of companies reporting losses. For analytical and investment purposes, most large financial institutions use the S&P 500 Index.

The S&P 500 Index closed at 6,632 on Friday, the lowest price in over four months. Market analysts believe a further decline of more than 3% will make a near-term market rise above its former high of 7,002 difficult for an extended period. The reason for this is, many of the investors who bought stocks before the decline will try to breakeven on the way up, making progress slow.

Question: What do you think?

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Premature: Buying Program to Begin Soon? - Weekly Blog # 931

Mike Lipper's Blog: Expectations Changing? - Weekly Blog # 930

Mike Lipper's Blog: Diversification - Weekly Blog # 929

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Comments

Comments

Premature: Buying Program to Begin Soon? - Weekly Blog # 931

2026-03-08T18:52:00.005-04:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Premature: Buying Program to Begin Soon?

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Basic Investment Principle

Investment opportunities are cyclical in both timing and magnitude. Larger gains are achieved after periods of extended declines. Since one does not know the extent of a decline or magnitude, it is wise to use a buying program. For instance, invest no more than 10% of buying reserves at any time. (This assumes you establish a buying reserve in rising markets. Charlie Munger has taught us to buy good companies at fair prices rather than always look for “cheap” prices.

Recently, my sister-in-law sent me a copy of a letter from my grandfather to my late brother sometime after he left the Marine Corps to begin his life in the investment business in the mid-1950s. My grandfather, who built his own brokerage firm for more than thirty years, cautioned my brother to always expect periodic recessions and less frequent depressions. He also advised him to not invest against the US, as the country was rich in natural resources. (This is still good advice, but there are times when our government makes our currency risky for a period.)

Where are We?

Most investors in defining where we are, do so by looking at where we have come from. The pundits wax poetic about recent data extrapolations, expecting the past to be repeated. My analytical training at the New York racetracks and as a US Marines Corp Officer was to always examine the current situation and expect some change.

Today, many pundits and politicians see an improving picture. As a student of financial history, I am conscious that it has been some time since the last recession. Furthermore, it has been 97 years since the Wall Street crash and the 12-year depression. Few people recognize any similarity between that time and our current condition.

Trading Alerts-Correction, Recession, or Depression?

The following are a number of alerts from last week suggesting we are entering a period of more declines than increases:

Morgan Stanley is planning to cut 3% of its customer-facing workers.
73% of stocks traded down on the NYSE and 67% on the NASDAQ. A pattern which has been going on for several weeks.
The ECRI industrial price index rose to 126%, a 4.73% gain year over year. Clearly, the war in the mid-east is inflationary. 85% of prices tracked by the Wall Street Journal each weekend declined, echoing the ECRI results
Individual investors and those serving retail investors are not confident in their outlook for the next 6 months. 33.1% are bullish and 35.5% bearish.
The S&P 500 index is the best indicator of the market for both institutional investors and wealthy investors. Along with most other indices, the S&P 500 index fell on Friday. If this was the beginning of a recession and the index were to decline to where its rise began, it would drop 28%. If this was the beginning of a relatively mild depression, the drop could be 49%.

Advice to Buy Program Buyers

I have found it extremely difficult to buy at the exact bottom, as most declines don’t appear convincing enough. The advantage of using a buy program strategy instead of a one-shot purchase is that you will likely have a collection of winners and losers before the overall market has reached back to its original starting point, assuming you buy 10% each month or quarter. However, that is not the point of the exercise. You should want to hold your position until it has reached the condition of a great company at too high a price, where some trimming makes sense.

Please share your thoughts with us.

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Expectations Changing? - Weekly Blog # 930

Mike Lipper's Blog: Diversification - Weekly Blog # 929

Mike Lipper's Blog: To Win Long-Term, Learn From Great Presidents - Weekly Blog # 928

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission

Comments

Comments

Expectations Changing? - Weekly Blog # 930

2026-03-01T16:41:00.002-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Expectations Changing?

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

The Main Motivator They Don’t Teach

Fear is the main motivator they don’t teach you about in pre-kindergarten through Ph. D studies. Primarily, this list is comprised of what can go wrong and what will hurt you, such as going broke, losing a job, or being defrauded. Discussions are informative but not particularly action oriented. What would be useful is a list of expectations, and of prime importance how to recognize them and what to do. These are life lessons which we all need but are not taught.

Each of us has our own level of awareness of critical expectations and we are aware of the changes in them. While all aspects of human life are open to change, I am going to focus on the expectations which impact our investment realities. These expectations are easier because they deal in large part with numbers. Numbers, like prices or earnings per share, are precise but mean different things to different people at different times.

The difficult part of dealing with expectations is identifying when they change and by how much. For example, a stock price expectation between $103 and $98, or an earnings per share expectation between $0.67 and $0.70. The critical issue is how early, or late investor expectations begin to evolve compared to others. Being early or late is often more impactful than being right or wrong?

Are We Changing Expectations?

A recent January survey of institutional investors had 50% expecting stock prices to rise, 39% expecting prices to be stable and 10% expecting prices to fall. An American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) six-month sample survey of investor expectations found 33.2% bullish and 32.9% bearish. Three weeks ago, both groups were about equally sure at 38%.

For the week ended Friday, more stocks fell on the NYSE and NASDAQ than rose (NYSE 56% and NASDAQ 53%, respectively). Normally slow-moving industrial commodity prices rose to123.06% from 121.92% the week before.

Most important of all, the US and Israel bombed Iran on Friday night. (The timing of the attack was a surprise to most, although the US has been building up its military and Naval forces in the Middle East recently.)

For some time, large companies in the US have not replaced retiring workers with new hires. We will see in the coming week if there is a large change in market expectations and whether that change in expectations is long-lasting.

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Diversification - Weekly Blog # 929

Mike Lipper's Blog: To Win Long-Term, Learn From Great Presidents - Weekly Blog # 928

Mike Lipper's Blog: Strategically, Time to Think Differently - Weekly Blog # 927

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Comments

Comments

Diversification - Weekly Blog # 929

2026-02-22T17:58:00.002-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Diversification

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Preface

On a recent trip to London, Ruth and I attended a private fund and friend raising concert for the Academy of St. Martin’s in the Fields (ASMF), where Ruth is the first American trustee. The wonderful music was performed by Joshua Bell, the artistic director, and five other top-notch string musicians from the ASMF. Between the six talented musicians they played three different types of string instruments, alternating between lead and ensemble roles. The result was a successful combination of each of their talents.

Even when listening to a magnificent concert performance, I cannot forget my investment responsibilities. As individual musicians alternated from leading to supporting roles, it reminded me of what individual securities should do in a diversified long-term investment portfolio.

Application to Portfolio Management

In 1940 the SEC completed their depression-oriented reform rules. Among the last of these was the Investment Company Act of 1940, which unlike the other six regulations was not formed at their SEC headquarters. It was produced at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington by lawyers for the fund industry from Boston, New York (where the industry’s trade association was headquartered), Philadelphia, and Washington. Considering their recent experience of the market falling during the Depression, the mood of the meeting was to try reduce the chance of big future declines. The best model for that were state laws governing trust accounts, using generations of work by Boston and Philadelphia lawyers. (Even as late as the early 1960s a few Boston law firms had professional securities analysts on staff to assist in managing trust accounts.) Note, the main concern of the creators of fund regulation was the avoidance of losses. No word was spoken of making money on investments.

They thought the best way to reduce the chance of major losses was to limit an account’s exposure to any single investment. This led to limiting the percentage amount that funds could invest in any one stock, which usually meant no more than 5% of the voting stock at cost (not market). To this very day, most equity funds are labeled as diversified if they adhere to this principal.

The Problem with Voting Stock Limits

The biggest penalty paid by investors is not losses, but the absence of profits. Mutual Funds with long histories often make ten, twenty, or even more times as much on some of their holdings, which more than covers a small number of losses. Furthermore, great fortunes have been made, particularly over successive generations, in single stock portfolios or portfolios having a small number of investments.

For Professional Investors

The concept of risk management is critical but doing it by name or percentage of voting shares does not reduce risk, it may increase if all investments are exposed to a single concept. In the late nineteenth century professional investors considered concentration to be the best and safest way to invest. My college degree is from Columbia University, which had an endowment fully invested in railroad bonds and stocks, every single one file for bankruptcy. Today there is a risk that some participants in the “AI” surge could produce similar results by investing in too much in a good thing.

For publicly traded securities I suggest the biggest risks is with the stock owner and not the issuer, as they will be sellers of the stock before you do. Other risks include countries, technology, politics, and management. These can be identified as short-term and long-term factors. A possible short-term indicator is slightly more participants being bearish than bullish in the latest American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) survey of expectations for the next six months. Interestingly, the long-term indicator was Friday’s announcement by the Supreme Court, which ruled against the President’s authority to set tariffs using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which had very little to any impact on the market.

Bottom line, watch the musicians play and how well they work together, both with other musicians and staff, but also watch the reaction of the audience.

Understanding Going Global

In a recent conversation with a London-based fund manager, who in the past was almost completely invested in the US but now has a growing position in European stocks. While he has the biggest portion of his portfolio in US securities, he is very risk aware and expresses this by augmenting his portfolio with European stocks. Normally, he expects his US positions to outperform his European positions, but not in a declining market. In terms of P/E, Free Cash Flow, Dividend Yield, and other value measures, European stocks are less risky than US holdings.

Another careful investor was Charlie Munger, who listed six principles to be avoided: High Financial Leverage, High Operating Leverage, Negative Cashflow, Poor Governance, High Risk of Obsolescence, No Competitive Advantage vs. a Strong Competitor.

Share your thoughts

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: To Win Long-Term, Learn From Great Presidents - Weekly Blog # 928

Mike Lipper's Blog: Strategically, Time to Think Differently - Weekly Blog # 927

Mike Lipper's Blog: Do Current Prices Lead Future Markets? - Weekly Blog # 926

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Comments

Comments

To Win Long-Term, Learn From Great Presidents - Weekly Blog # 928

2026-02-14T18:11:00.002-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

To Win Long-Term,

Learn From Great Presidents

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Losing is Part of Winning

In the US, we celebrate Presidents Day on Monday. A typical US compromise that solved an immediate political problem and ignored the long-term implications that would have benefited all, particularly investors. Numerous Americans wanted to celebrate the birthdays of two of our greatest presidents, George Washington, and Abraham Lincoln. However, perhaps for economic reasons the political leadership decided to celebrate just one date, picking neither President’s birthday but continuing to support the travel and retail shopping industries by requiring Presidents Day always be celebrated on a Monday.

What these politicians lost in their efforts were critical learning experiences. In terms of opposed contests, both leaders lost more than they won. Washington in military battles and Lincoln in elections. Unlike many of us, they learned from these defeats. (As Warren Buffett said, losing is part of winning.)

Applying Learned Experiences to Portfolios

I learned a lot at the racetrack, but my objective was to finish with more money than I started. Washington wanted the rebellion to survive and by so doing he would force the superior power to concede defeat. (The British marched out of Yorktown to the tune “The World Turned Upside Down”.) Lincoln preserved the Union. Both Presidents needed selective reserves to accomplish their goals.

Applying these lessons to portfolios, I am a believer in taking risks on individual investments but avoiding the risk of a complete wipe out. In a study of million-dollar retirement accounts at Fidelity, the winning results used both stocks and bonds. I would rename the components equity risk and interest rate/survival risk.

What I found interesting was the median account allocation of 70% stocks and 30% bonds for these millionaires. Currently, I have about 70% in funds/direct equities and 30% in reserves, with about half of that in cash or bonds/notes under two-year duration.

The Logic Behind a 70/30 Portfolio

Looking through a collection of portfolios over time and dividing them into 10-year performance slices, it appears 80% of the equity slices go up in value. As a fiduciary, I assume a more conservative approach with the 70% equity risk.

I consider the overall portfolio to be a 20/20 portfolio, with the “normal” equity risk assumption being 70%. This permits market movements of 20% in either direction, without needing to change the basic balance. On the downside, if the portfolio balance reaches a point of having only 50% in equities, I would add 10% of capital to equities. On the upside, once equities reach 90%. I would rebuild a 10% optimistic reserve.

Not Built in Yet

We live and invest in a multi-speed world. Due to electronic processing most commercial and agricultural world price trends are impacted at an increasingly fast speed. Some of these trends reflect fast reactions to price movements, which cause geographic rotation. Through last Thursday on a year-to-date basis the S&P 500 generated a -0.07% loss and is essentially flat, with Europe gaining +4.51%, Japan +13.96%, Australia +3.8%, and Canada in local currency +2.56%. In most of these countries there are local and multi-national producers who experience similar problems of prices representing different costs, size-weighted efficiencies, local preferences, and legal/tax regulatory differences. Customers and investors are quick to rotate their actions.

On a longer-term basis the world is going through a period of declining fertility rates, impacting local demand in the short term. On a longer-term basis there will be fewer workers, which will result in retirement capital being reduced and securities markets altered. Organizations active in the markets are changing. On the one hand there is a desire to become bigger and serve more firms and people, while others want to increase profitability and remain small enough to grow profits per key player.

As populations age, they become more expensive to maintain, particularly beyond their working ages.

In Conclusion:

We should all learn from George Washington and Abraham Lincoln and adapt to change with sufficient humility, so we don’t become bystanders passed in the fast parade hurtling through.

Thoughts?

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Strategically, Time to Think Differently - Weekly Blog # 927

Mike Lipper's Blog

Mike Lipper's Blog: Failed Expectations: Do Details Count? Zig-Zag Flips - Weekly Blog # 925

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Comments

Comments

Strategically, Time to Think Differently - Weekly Blog # 927

2026-02-08T15:43:00.004-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Strategically, Time to Think Differently

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Warning: Almost No One Will Agree, Nevertheless Consider

My Burden: Hedging

After a market week of lots of good earnings and media pundit optimism, it’s time to worry. Individually, before we consider securities investments, we should consider our personal long-term investments. For most of our adult lives our two biggest investments are our homes and jobs. While we believe we know the numbers, we are wrong!

We fail to include in the analysis of our residence the true costs that come with the property over time. For instance, we do not include real estate taxes, either paid directly or included in rent payments. If we stay in our homes for ten years, in one place or more, the aggregate cost will probably equal the cost of buying initially. But that is not the actual cost of living in a home. That amount should also include the cost of local organizations we join, as well as the cost of any repairs and maintenance. Thus, the combined cost should be considered, as well as the planned next location, which likely represents a potentially large unhedged risk.

As large as the cost of home ownership is, it is hopefully smaller than the next risk. For most of us, our biggest risk throughout perhaps the first twenty years of our adult lives, is employment risk. If we work for one or multiple employers and we are not self-employed during most of our working years, our biggest risk is employment risk. We are living in a fast-changing economic world, where employers disappear as a result of business mistakes, technological change, badly executed mergers, and younger, smarter, better educated, and cheaper competitors.

We are Not Helpless

Over time, we can not only help ourselves but also accumulate sufficient capital to provide long-lasting wealth to cover our own lives and hopefully those of our loved ones too. This can be accomplished by regularly spending less than we make through our jobs and investments. Cyclicality is our enemy. As we move up in the commercial world an increasing portion of our wealth comes from accepting portions of compensation that have equity-like rewards and risks. The further you move up the economic ladder, the greater the rewards and risks. Additionally, the higher you go up the ladder, the more cyclical it becomes. Income fluctuates with sales and profits, but also due to changes in politics within the organization. This cyclicality should be hedged to the degree possible.

Selection of Investments is Critical

Picking good investments is always difficult. For the most protection, the primary goal should be seeking assets that hedge those investments generating the highest gain. I believe we are on the cusp of a period of major change, not the continuation of “happy talk” optimism. This past week there were dramatic headline changes of direction, but the market as measured by the S&P 500 barely returned to its prior high. Concurrently, the Economic Cyclical Research Institute (ECRI) industrial price indicator dropped to 122.27% from the prior week’s 131.20%. While this was an extremely happy reading of growing inflation, I suspect it was driven by natural gas prices plummeting -21.41% and diesel falling -4.79%. Far too many retail investors follow prices on the NYSE, where 39% of the stocks declined for the week. However, the better performing NASDAQ Composite saw 56% of its prices fall. Also, the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) weekly sample survey showed the bullish outlook falling to +39.7% from +44.4% the prior week. In the real-world January produced the largest cut in jobs, which have been falling for 8 months.

Conclusion: One Should Hedge

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read:

Mike Lipper's Blog

Mike Lipper's Blog: Is This The Week That Ends Instability? - Weekly Blog # 924

Mike Lipper's Blog: How Much Longer Can We Avoid Thinking About the Long-Term? - Weekly Blog # 923

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Comments

Comments

Do Current Prices Lead Future Markets? - Weekly Blog # 926

2026-02-01T22:58:00.007-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Do Current Prices Lead Future Markets?

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Lessons From the Weatherperson

With condolences to too many in the US and Europe this weekend, no snow came down in Summit, New Jersey today. The purpose of mentioning this is not to gloat, because we will have our share of bad weather in the future. The purpose is to remind all of the lack of certainty in predictions, and to remind all that the real value of weather-people is making professional investors look good!

I have one advantage in the securities analysis game, another title for predictions. My advantage is I learned analysis at the New York racetracks. The first thing was to read the situation, which included the conditions of each race and many other details. The purpose of this exercise was to eliminate races that were difficult to analyze. For example, younger horses with little to no experience, or a clear standout quoted at very small odds. Remember, my prime objective was to leave the track with more money than when I arrived, after expenses. A goal only a minority achieved each day. (This led to never wagering all on any given race and having enough money to get home. Thus, I am not fully committed in my current portfolio.)

The next task was to compare the records of the horses, which usually produced horses with the most wins or fastest times. This exercise normally produced a list with the smallest betting-odds, and they would generally be excluded because the payoffs were relatively small. So much so that they would not even cover prior or future losses. (This is like coming to a highly favored stock in a late market phase)

With all these eliminations, what is left? What I found at the track and later at my desk were bits of information in public view, suggesting that on a given day a horse could do well and beat the more popular favorite. (This was and still is my current hunting ground for investments.)

The Big Advantage

There is a big long-term advantage in selecting investments over picking horses at the track. When the day at the track is over, the game restarts the next time you enter the track. With investing in securities your investment progress passes through a number of phases. I find it easier to pick securities, which will have more up phases than down. The big advantage is that after an up phase there is more at risk than what you initially put in. If there are subsequent up phases, your returns are the product of your initial investment plus the return on other people’s money. A study of the returns of successful people captures this compounding impact.

Applying The Track’s Principles Today

Enthusiasm is the enemy of finding current bargains. Most long-term investors, if they don’t get punished by high expenses, taxes, and selling large portions of their wealth quickly, have a good record of growing capital. However, if they get sucked into the market when most are enthusiastic about its progress, they become victims when enthusiasm shifts. The greater the number of transactions the greater chance they will not only have poor returns but will lack the capital and the guts to buy when securities are cheap.

The 2026 Shift

One month is hardly conclusive that markets around the world are expecting a different game, but the S&P 600 Small Cap Index led most other US stock indices with a gain of +5.61% in January. (If that rate of monthly gains were to continue throughout the year, the annual gain would be over 100%)

By comparison, if a January S&P 500 Index gain of +1.45% continued for a year it would produce another double-digit return. The problem is that it results in a four-year period of double-digit returns. (I suspect the doubling of one of the small cap indices is more likely than a four-year period of double-digit gains in the S&P 500 Index. Goldman Sachs calculated that if only 1% of the capital invested in the S&P 500 moved to the S&P 600, it would raise the latter’s price by 37%.) For perspective, of the 105 Mutual fund peer group averages, only 8 were up double digits.

Now To The Real World

In the last 3 weeks the usually slow moving ECRI Industrial Price Index came alive with successive weekly readings of 131.20, 126.28, and 117.67. The gain over all of last year was +11.50%. The three biggest price-increases this week in The Wall Street Journal were Natural Gas +20.64%, ULSD (diesel fuel) +12.16%, and Crude +6.78%. (I wonder what the present Fed and the probable new Chairman after May will do.)

There are lot of other worrisome statics out there. In a recent report Michael Roberts listed some 17 economic return elements that are worth looking at. I have selected just a few of them for you to digest.

Healthcare and social services generated more than 100% of net payroll gains in 2025. Top decile earners now account for about 45% of total consumption. (These top decile earners won’t be the beneficiaries of the tax changes in ’26.)
Softer demand for luxury goods suggests financial stress is beginning to move up the ladder.
Layoffs have reached recessionary levels and wage growth continues to slow.
Creditors are increasingly unwilling to lend at historically low real yields.
A recent PWC survey of 4000 global CEOs found that confidence in revenue growth had fallen to a five-year low.

Next Two Years

Odds are, the next two years will be anything but smooth. The key to surviving this troubled period is maintaining capital in diverse financial and other assets. Gather as many resourceful people as possible into your circle. Stay alert and get comfortable with change. Lastly, share your thoughts with us.

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Failed Expectations: Do Details Count? Zig-Zag Flips - Weekly Blog # 925

Mike Lipper's Blog: Is This The Week That Ends Instability? - Weekly Blog # 924

Mike Lipper's Blog: How Much Longer Can We Avoid Thinking About the Long-Term? - Weekly Blog # 923

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Comments

Comments

Failed Expectations: Do Details Count? Zig-Zag Flips - Weekly Blog # 925

2026-01-25T17:39:00.000-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Failed Expectations

Do Details Count? Zig-Zag Flips

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Was this the week that was?

Last week’s blog anticipated a ruling by the US Supreme Court on the Presidential use of Executive Orders to impose tariffs on countries and products. It was further expected that the President would use substitute measures to accomplish similar goals if he loses the Supreme Court case. Additionally, there was a belief that the government would be forced to repay the existing tariffs to the American people (voters). The new tariffs would probably cause some changes by foreign nations. None of this happened.

Instead, the major topic of conversation at the World Economic Forum at Davos was Greenland. Discussions moved at lightening or Trump speed from a military occupation to a not fully disclosed peaceful agreement with NATO forces by the end of the week. The importance of these dramatic changes reminds us of what may be topic one in developing future investment strategies. All of this brief history shows how wrong we can be. What we missed was the significant price level change that occurred this week.

Critical Price Changes

Starting with the least followed ECRI industrial price index, which normally moves ploddingly. The index rose to 126.28 from the prior week’s 120.49. The jump raised the year-over-year gain to 6.58%, which is greater than the various inflation measures the Fed and many others use. I would not be surprised to see industrial buyers of products add this amount to their resale prices, after adding an insurance amount to protect their profits against further prices increases.

One explanation of ECRI prices can be found in the weekly price chart in the weekend Wall Street Journal, which showed Natural Gas rising +70.0% and Silver +14.57% for the week. Part of these increases could be for increased use of these items in the normal course of business. However, I suspect some of the increased demand comes from trading and/or gambling interests, either on the long side or from covering short positions. The importance of the last sentence is that the size of the trading and gambling sectors is growing, and I believe it’s already quite large.

The third price increase impacts all of us in our daily purchase of goods and services. It is the value of the dollar. On Friday the 16th of January the US dollar index was 99.395, one week later it was 97.599. The President has threatened foreign countries if they sell US assets!! (I personally believe this won’t happen, but it shows a sensitivity to the value of the dollar, even though Trump and Xi have both advocated for a lower value of their currencies as mercantilists.)

Warning

I have already indicated how wrong I can be. Please be careful in developing your own investment strategy and make changes slowly, not abruptly.

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Is This The Week That Ends Instability? - Weekly Blog # 924

Mike Lipper's Blog: How Much Longer Can We Avoid Thinking About the Long-Term? - Weekly Blog # 923 Mike Lipper's Blog: Data May Be Signaling Change - Weekly Blog # 922

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Comments

Comments

Is This The Week That Ends Instability? - Weekly Blog # 924

2026-01-18T17:49:00.007-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Is This The Week That Ends Instability?

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Preface

I believe it was Lenin who said there are decades when nothing happens; and there are weeks when decades happen. Possibly, the four-day trading week beginning this coming Tuesday is such a period. In both the Financial Times and her podcast, Liz Ann Sonders of Charles Schwab* introduced the concept of the period we are going through as an extended period of instability. I am suggesting it is possible the beginning of the end of this period may have begun.

*Shares held in in managed and personal accounts.

Fund Data Sets the Table

Whether one invests in mutual funds or not, one should recognize that not only do many people invest in them, but more importantly, many fund managers get their training at fund shops. Thus, one can get an understanding of the institutional mind set by looking at fund data. In the five years ended last Thursday, the London Stock Exchange Group published my old firm’s weekly study of 105 equity related mutual fund peer-groups average performances.

The average performance of S&P 500 Index funds was 14.05% compounded for the past five years. There were only five peer group averages that were better: Precious Metals Equity Funds +21.50%, Energy MLP Funds +20.79%, Commodities Precious Metals Funds +18.75%, Natural Resources Funds +17.30%, and Global Natural Resources Funds +16.05%. There were just two better performing thematic categories, precious metals and energy. The narrowness of performance leadership proves how difficult it was to pick winners for the past five years. The leadership crown was indeed unstable.

Another way to identify the instability in economic data is to examine the tails of the best and worst 2 items shown in Saturday’s WSJ weekly price chart. The best was Silver +11.67% and the second best was the KOPSI +5.55%. The second worst price performance was Financials -2.33%, which was half as bad as Corn -4.71%, the worst performer. The gaps between the top two leaders and laggards suggest concentration is at play.

Turning Points Possible Next Week

On Tuesday, probably in the late afternoon, SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the US) is expected to announce its decision on the IEEPA tariff. The President has said he is prepared for an unfavorable ruling and has substitute measures in mind. At best this will be disruptive, and possibly inflationary. The ECRI industrial price index, which is normally slow moving, rose to 120.49% from the prior week’s level of 117.42%.

Markets are anticipating problems, either from Tariffs or possibly Iran. Sixty-two percent of the stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) rose last week, while only fifty-three percent rose on the NASDAQ. The NASDAQ trades more tech stocks and the shares of younger companies. Thus, the junior exchange is likely to react more than the “Big Board” to news events. Retail investors, when not gambling, are more active on the junior market. One possible measure of this is the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey, which reported 49.5% bullish for the next six months, up from 42.5% the prior week. What may be more significant is the 28.2% that were bearish. Many professional traders believe “the public” is wrong at turning points.

The Davos meeting begins Tuesday, with many political and economic leaders present and chatting. One doesn’t know what will be discussed and how meaningful the meetings will be.

Keep us Informed as to any Changes in Your Views.

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: How Much Longer Can We Avoid Thinking About the Long-Term? - Weekly Blog # 923

Mike Lipper's Blog: Data May Be Signaling Change - Weekly Blog # 922

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investment Time Horizon Should Pick How You Measure the Results - Weekly Blog # 921

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

How Much Longer Can We Avoid Thinking About the Long-Term? - Weekly Blog # 923

2026-01-11T19:52:00.000-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

How Much Longer Can We Avoid

Thinking About the Long-Term?

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

First Week 2026

Using the performance of equity mutual funds, it was a great week with average gains of more than +2%. If repeated for each week of the year it would produce returns of over 100%. Even the value of the US dollar rose a bit during the week. That was the delusional news! What’s even worse, the average commodity fund invested in gold and other precious metals rose +4.02%. Funds owning stocks of gold and other precious metal mining companies gained +5.32% on average through Thursday. The latter can suffer mining risks, labor strikes, and raised taxes. Historically, gold has been a hedge against the value of a currency, particularly the US dollar. There is also a small industrial market for gold in the electronics market, which might be in the region of $1,000 an ounce. How much demand for gold jewelry is really demand for a convenient way to pass on its monetary value? I don’t know. Part of the demand for gold as a use in the crypto world is not known by me. All told, I suspect over half of the value of gold is as a substitute for the US dollar.

What Is The Value Of The US dollar?

Something is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. Currently, it appears to be about $0.99 cents, up from $0.96 cents. However, the critical question is its worth in the future. That appears to be what someone is willing to pay for it, delivered today or on a specific date and quantity in the future.

According to a paper prepared by the National Bureau of Economic Research. Twenty-five years ago, people believed the US fiscal budget looking forward 10 years would be $5.9 Billion, with all public debt paid off by 2006. The readers of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act now project a 2054 debt to GDP ratio of 199%, incorporating temporary provisions. Net interest payments would rise to 6.3% from 3.2% today. (I don’t know how to impact these numbers with the increase in gambling. In first 11 months of 2025, total sports gambling in New Jersey was $67 Billion. The rise of non-securities backed gambling, particularly among the young, appears to be on the rise.)

Why Should We Care?

Even with the increase in retail securities markets investing, institutional investors set the prices of fixed income securities and many large-cap stocks. Most money invested through 401k and similar retirement accounts are invested in mutual funds or SMAs. Insurance companies, endowments, and other institutional investors may increase their investment in foreign securities, which will impact domestic stock prices. Both domestic and foreign controlled investors may shift some of their investment focus if the dollar becomes weaker.

Leaders Increasingly Think Globally

Foreign leaders have increasingly thought globally in determining their strategies. Our main adversaries, China, Russia, and North Korea are strategists, whereas the US tends to view the world as tacticians through domestic glasses and the next election time scale. Luckily, many of our domestic commercial leaders are increasingly thinking strategically.

Strategies Going Forward

Going forward, we should recognize that the world is changing at a rapid rate and we need to change with it. Old rules and strategies will change. We must be careful.

Please share your thoughts.

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Data May Be Signaling Change - Weekly Blog # 922

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investment Time Horizon Should Pick How You Measure the Results - Weekly Blog # 921

Mike Lipper's Blog: Tis the Season of Joy & Reflection - Weekly Blog # 920

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Data May Be Signaling Change - Weekly Blog # 922

2026-01-04T18:15:00.006-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Data May Be Signaling Change

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Preface

I came to my desk Saturday morning and was prepared to begin writing this week’s blog. My thought pattern suggested we were quite possibly in a pivot period, with market leadership shifting to foreign priced securities priced substantially below “AI” securities. Then I paid attention to Bloomberg television, which is on 24 hours a day. I was mesmerized by the news on the raid on Caracas, the capital of Venezuela. The daring and skills involved were impressive and the growing implications are disturbing.

Normally, I try to view everything from a global perspective, as I believe almost all we do has roots in the global world. However, for this week’s blog I am not going to deal with the longer-term implications of the successful raid and capture of indicted criminals. It is too early to tell. I expect these events will create global shadows which I will address in future blogs. The world listens but does not necessarily follow the U.S

Pivoting to the Data

Last Two Weeks of 2025

Each of the last two trading weeks, including January 2nd, have had only four trading days of relatively light trading volume. A disproportionate number of trades were either tax motivated, or position statement driven. Nevertheless, they share traits with many earlier days of December’s trading, with more stocks sold on minus ticks than rising prices. It is worth noting that the popular stock market indices generally rose a small amount. This highlights the dichotomy in the market between what many believe are retail driven indices and a broader, slower-moving institutional market. I am guessing many retirement and other long-term institutions were relatively quiet in the last part of 2025.

This institutional hesitation mirrors the large corporations’ labor practices, where many companies spend considerable amounts training new employees, which they consider assets. They are therefore reluctant to fire many employees and are slow to hire new workers. Some believe in the “promise of “AI”, where in the not-too-distant future companies will need less employees to produce the same or more sales. Consequently, many employers are not hiring new employees, other than critical replacements.

Typically, corporations begin investing new capital into their retirement plans in January, be it pension or 401-k accounts. The institutional advisory community has counted on this flow in the past. My guess, it may be smaller this year. We will see.

Prices and Inflation

There were two lessons on prices in the Weekend Edition of The Wall Street Journal, which measures 72 traded items each week. Only 24 prices or one-third were up, and 48 prices were down. Are we peaking? The second lesson from these data is that markets deal with both extreme momentary shortages and slower moving prices, which are more common. One analytical technique I use to differentiate them is to examine the top and bottom two prices. On the upside is Comex Silver +142.34% and Platinum +127.57%. On the downside are Orange Juice -58.75% and Cocoa -48.05%. I believe these four are special imbalances, as the third extreme prices are the KOSPI composite +75.63% and the Argentine Peso -28.96%. The gaps between the extremes and third ranking are large. Much smaller but concerning nevertheless is the one-week industrial prices gain of +1.28% in the ECRI weekly index, suggesting inflation is not under control.

The Key Link

If there were a single suggestion of a world view of the US economy, it would be the value of the US dollar. The Financial Times headline “Dollar Is Wild Card in 2026”. This UK publication, now owned by the Japanese newspaper/wire service giant, is a traditional critic of the US. The value of the dollar is dependent on two factors, the value of the other major currencies and the price of the dollar. In 2025, numerous foreign markets have for the first time in many years appreciated more than the US. Currencies, like securities, are priced at their perceived future value. Not only is the US government spending more than it is earning through taxes and tariffs, but it’s also expected by many to continue to do so in the future. (Even if tariffs bring in a lot of money, part of the receipts are expected to be paid to citizens instead of being used to pay our debts.) In addition, both President Trump and Chairman Yi have stated they would both like their currencies to decline. Some weakness in the dollar may have been caused by individual and institutional investors selling dollars to buy foreign securities.

What to Do?

Examine whether it is prudent to have 100% of your long-term investment money in securities that are traded primarily in dollars? Is it time to pivot?

Share your thoughts, please.

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investment Time Horizon Should Pick How You Measure the Results - Weekly Blog # 921

Mike Lipper's Blog: Tis the Season of Joy & Reflection - Weekly Blog # 920

Mike Lipper's Blog: Are Investors Seeing a Change? Politicos Are Not - Weekly Blog # 919

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Investment Time Horizon Should Pick How You Measure the Results - Weekly Blog # 921

2025-12-28T22:01:00.003-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Investment Time Horizon Should Pick

How You Measure the Results

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Current Situation

Billions of people invest directly or indirectly in US securities markets, with each having somewhat different motivations and thoughts about what they are doing. Since we don’t know these people and the way they think, we simply group them into buckets. I have found the intended investment period often defines how they invest and for what period.

My outlook is of someone who has served families and institutions, and I tend to think long-term for them. As most money invested in mutual funds is largely for retirement and most institutions are designed to pay out their assets over an extended period of many years, they too have a long-term time horizon. (Unfortunately, this focus on the long term does not come with a knowledge of what the future will bring in terms of risks and rewards.)

The media concentrates on “news” and fills space with the current chatter about the present and the next expected announcement of note. Most security salespeople and money managers believe potential investors are primarily interested in the present and that is the focus of their sales pitches.

These two different focuses have led to two very different market structures. The hyper action-oriented players dwell on any market development that leads to a move in stock prices. They celebrate the percentage gains of interim results and prognostications. Those who use securities to meet future payments are concerned about anything that might reduce these payments in terms of future purchasing power. A possible tell-tale signal of a threat is the sale of securities by supposedly knowledgeable investors.

This is the tug of war between those seeking near-terms rewards and those worrying about the loss of worth of some future payment. To satisfy both camps the stock exchanges publish the volume of shares sold at higher and lower prices and the number of issues which rose and fell each trading day.

In the latest week there were only four trading days and one of those was half a day. On the last day the volume of shares traded on the NYSE was down by approximately 2/3rds and by approximately one half on the NASDAQ*. (In the current market environment, I pay more attention to the NASDAQ, as it has risen the most this year due to having more “Tech” companies, whose stock prices are more volatile than those on “The Big Board”. On Monday the 4 indicators were larger for the NASDAQ and on Tuesday the NYSE saw better results. This see-saw pattern has occurred frequently throughout the year.) For the week, 65 % of NASDAQ stocks rose in price vs 61% for the NYSE.

*Client and personal accounts own shares in NASDAQ.

In terms of looking at the future there were two interesting notices. The Conference Board Consumer Sentiment Survey was 89.1% vs 92.9% the prior month. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) saw a drop in bullish sentiment for the next six months in their sample survey, dropping to 37.4% from 44.1% the prior week.

Understanding the Measure

Most of the chatter about this change focused on the percentage change from the period immediately prior. However, there is another way to look at the results, the way an actuary would in determining the chance of a certain event happening. This is done by reviewing the entire history of the statistical sample, including any possible period where that event could reappear and at what frequency. For example, one chance out of fifty years, or every 84 months, or something similar. History traced through geological discoveries has recorded cycles of expansions and contractions with some regularity. It is much easier with regular barter or the development of money.

Said simply, when there is a shortage of supply over the level of demand, prices go up. When there is more supply than demand, prices drop. Climate also impacts agriculture, as does the effort of humans. The supply of money was a recent concern, which has more recently shifted to concerns about the supply of credit and certain natural resources. In all cases, it is the imbalance of critical items which moves prices to a point of excess, which causes a reversal.

Small reversals happen more frequently than large ones, often occurring within a single presidential term. However, small reversals periodically stretch over two or conceivably three terms. In trying to avoid or stop small declines, the application of well-meaning changes can trigger bigger declines, which we label depressions.

Addressing the economic hardships caused by the cost of fighting WWI led to an extended period of debt expansion, which initially hurt the farming communities. This led to the application of tariffs to protect small banks which extended loans to over expanded farmers and farm equipment dealers in critically important mid-western senate seats. Simultaneously, the public became enamored with the use of credit in an already highly priced stock market.

The market crash of 1929 caused many people to lose money in margin accounts, along with many of their brokers. The market reached a bottom in 1931, but people were scared by what had happened. In 1932 they elected FDR as President as a protector of the banks, and he closed all the banks in 1933 in an attempt to restructure society. Even though FDR lost most of his battles with the Constitution and the Courts, he initiated various government agencies that mismanaged the economy until we entered WWII, which he helped start in both the Pacific and Atlantic. The US recovered slowly after the war and subsequent Korean Conflict, although some stocks listed on the NYSE did not reach their 1929 highs until the mid-1960s with the discounted dollar.

Semi Parallels Today

There has been an expansion of debt both at the federal and individual level, with bankruptcies currently rising. At the same time, prudent constraints on the financial community have been reduced or eliminated. Additionally, we have an underequipped military, including Navy, Air, Space, and Coast Guard not ready for a multi-front war.

Conclusion:

We don’t know when the next decline will happen, or if the depth of the decline will morph into a depression. However, we should resist being fully exposed to rising gains in the non-public market while we experience a stagnant private economy. It is possible gains achieved in 2026 may be expensive in the long run, so be careful.

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Tis the Season of Joy & Reflection - Weekly Blog # 920

Mike Lipper's Blog: Are Investors Seeing a Change? Politicos Are Not - Weekly Blog # 919

Mike Lipper's Blog: On The Way To Casualties & Eventually Riches - Weekly Blog # 918

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Tis the Season of Joy & Reflection - Weekly Blog # 920

2025-12-21T19:12:00.000-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Tis the Season of Joy & Reflection

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

The Season

Around the world families and friends gather to exchange holiday wishes with those who are close to us, either in person or through electronic devices. We express feelings of goodwill, with the hope that all are happy and in good health. We often harken back to times of shared thoughts as we communicate with one another.

As we get older, we reflect on the progress that we and those close to us have made over time. It is remarkable how much success we have had and do not dwell on less happy periods we have passed through. Those of us who carry the investment and political bug lapse into thoughts about the unknown future, which will likely bring periods of happiness and sadness. As an addict of history, I know we will live through both types of times. My wish for all of our families and friends is that we continue to enjoy more good than bad periods, and most importantly learn from both.

Last Week was not of much help, or was it?

The first three trading days showed more losses than gains. The last two days generated advances that more than made up for the earlier losses. For the week there was a slight gain, leaving the three main stock market indices less than 3% from record levels. (For most of 2025 the S&P 500 traded in a relatively narrow band. Market analysts often believe this type of banded performance is the storing up of energy to either break up or down by a significant amount.) However, looking at the week as a whole, 50.8% fell on the NYSE and 60.1% fell on the NASDAQ. On the “Big Board” there were 233 new highs vs. 198 new lows, while on NASDAQ new lows were the majority, 554 new lows vs. 352 new highs. (Since the NASDAQ has risen more for the year, I believe it is a better guide to professional thinking, at least at the moment.)

What is more important?

All market analysis is about picking the expected period of ownership. Warren Buffet would like to never sell a stock he’d bought for Berkshire Hathaway, which is owned by us in client and personal accounts. (This may change a bit under the new CEO of Berkshire.) His approach is followed by other publicly traded family holding companies, who additionally own shares of Belgium, Canadian, French, Italian, and Swedish companies. (For the most part, all of these companies invest for the foreseeable long-term, which we try to copy.)

In looking at the long-term, we expect that stock prices to be cyclical, with some down periods. Most of these holding companies are buyers of stocks below their perceived long-term investment value. (We try to do the same.)

Applying this thinking to 2026

Having learned analysis at the New York race tracks I look for a wide gap in the odds posted, which measures the amount of money invested in each horse and the self-determined probability of each opportunity. When the gap is large it is worth a bet. Recognizing that in order to win I must overcome track fees, individual expenses, taxes, and racing luck. There is also a near certainty that on average I will be wrong (premature) on some individual bets, but right on monies bet and earned. When this logic is applied to investing in stocks and funds, I am very selective and very conscious of the investment environment. When the bulk of the crowd is betting considerable amounts of money in one direction, I don’t bet or at least bet very differently than the crowd.

Currently, the crowd believes stock prices are attractive and are expected to rise as they have for a number of years. However, each year that stocks rise reduces the probability of them rising in subsequent years. Considering the number of years of positive performance, the chance of a repeat is low. Especially when you consider the US election cycle, a bullish government reducing domestic constraints, Ukraine, Middle East tensions, an ambitious China, and technological challenges.

The one thing wrong with my outlook is the frequency of the number of declines over advances. There were some sellers in the late 1920s, one of which was my grandfather, to the benefit of his clients.

This may not be the time to be 100% in or out. What do you think?

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Are Investors Seeing a Change? Politicos Are Not - Weekly Blog # 919

Mike Lipper's Blog: On The Way To Casualties & Eventually Riches - Weekly Blog # 918

Mike Lipper's Blog: Was it the week that wasn’t? - Weekly Blog # 917

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Are Investors Seeing a Change? Politicos Are Not - Weekly Blog # 919

2025-12-14T16:57:00.003-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Are Investors Seeing a Change?

Politicos Are Not

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Was the latest week instructive?

During the low volume week: the DJIA fell -0.51%, the S&P 500 fell -1.07% and the NASDAQ fell -1.69%. One does not know a trend is over until a meaningful reversal of direction has occurred, which quite possibly was the case this week. On the NASDAQ there were more decliners than gainers, unlike the “Big Board” where there were more gainers. However, since the April 8th bottom, the NASDAQ Composite Index has led the US general stock market, gaining +51.92% compared to +37.02% for the S&P 500 and +28.72% for the DJIA.

The supporters of the political party that currently occupies leadership in both chambers and the White House cheer these recoveries but appear to ignore other data. For example, real private non-residential fixed income investments, excluding data centers, have been flat since 2020 and is far behind 2023 prices.

The Real Problem is Bad Debt Creation

For the “bulls” to be proven right, a large portion of the public’s uninvested money must be corralled to invest in the economy, in sufficient amounts necessary to generate the tax revenues required to support government spending and address the growth of the deficit. Instead, they are doing this by removing the Controller of the Currency and the leverage lending guidelines of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which they felt were too restrictive. To add more fuel to risk capital they are encouraging retail investors to put some of their retirement income savings into private debt investments, even though there has been an increase in bankruptcies over the last four years.

Economic Tailwinds

Optimist believe the economy should have the wind at its back in 2026 due to the following positive events resulting from the “Big Beautiful Bill”. However, it remains to be seen whether these events translate into additional stock market gains or if these events are already reflected in current market prices. Some of these events could also be negatively impacted by Supreme Court decisions on tariffs.

A relatively large number of taxpayers will see tax reductions in 2026, with some seeing tax refunds early in the year.
Reduced regulations should decrease the cost of doing business and speed up the introduction of products to market.
The reshoring commitment of over $18 trillion in manufacturing capacity should boost construction and the jobs required for that task.
AI capacity construction should continue throughout most of 2026.
Energy capacity construction will likely increase in 2026, with the introduction of small-scale nuclear power and construction of a new natural gas pipeline from Pennsylvania to New York.
The House of Representatives passed a $900 billion military budget, which includes pay raises and an increase in defense spending. This bill still needs to go through the Senate before it becomes law. Some of these funds will be used to retool the military for modern warfare, which includes increased use of AI and unmanned vehicles.

Various underwriters are predicting that equity markets will generate double digit rates of return. On a long-term basis this is extremely difficult to do and can only be achieved by accepting the risk of periodic losses. By year end the year the S&P 500 Index could see its third consecutive year of annual gains exceeding 20%. Only once, from 1995-1998, has the market seen a 4-year period of consecutive annual gains of 20%.

Bottom line: Be Careful

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: On The Way To Casualties & Eventually Riches - Weekly Blog # 918

Mike Lipper's Blog: Was it the week that wasn’t? - Weekly Blog # 917

Mike Lipper's Blog: Recession/Depression Risk Assumptions - Weekly Blog # 916

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

On The Way To Casualties & Eventually Riches - Weekly Blog # 918

2025-12-07T18:08:00.004-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

On The Way To

Casualties & Eventually Riches

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Current Situation

In the fog of the latest week there were a few possible clues of changes and pronouncements.

In November, US manufacturing activity contracted for the 9th month.
After Friday’s close, an emerging market fund rose +4.99%.
The value of the US dollar has fallen -6.16% year-to-date.
Financial Times headline: “Wall Street expects double digit gains next year”.
Apollo provided a glossy wrapper to the weekend Wall Street Journal, titled “What if the old financial playbook is costing you?”
The Trump boom is comparable to past expansions, but not yet as big a percentage gain of GDP as the railroad boom of the 1880s.

Each of these bullets point to possible clues for the future, which should be examined by long-term oriented investors and their managers, as this blog will attempt to do.

The search for Investment clues

While we have become a service-oriented economy with high dependence on the skills and attitudes of workers, politicians focus more on the manufacturing sector which has more unions and workers paying real estate taxes and buying lots of local supplies. Thus, manufacturing jobs are more important in Washington than in NYC. I suspect the re-shoring of manufacturing will probably be more automated and will have less employees. Consequently, office holders need to worry about ’26 and ’28.
The real purpose of announcing tariffs was to force meetings with economic leaders to reduce non-tariff trade barriers. This has led to numerous currencies dropping more than the US dollar. (In my view, this is the wrong way to create more prosperity. We should be raising interest rates, so we are able to absorb the likely increase in bad debts, particularly those held by private capital. Higher interest rates will also raise foreign exchange rates, encouraging foreign lands to utilize more of our exports. A richer world is safer and better for us than a poorer one.)
The “street” is predicting at least a 10% gain next year. This year the median US Diversified Mutual fund produced a year-to-date gain of +12.55% and an annualized gain of +10.12% for the five-year period, this is at least 2-3% better than the expected net income gain. The difference is the result of other income and stock buybacks. Currently, public polls suggest investors are not happy with the results.
Bankruptcies are increasing, particularly in non-listed companies. Private capital raises money to invest in the equity of these companies or to buy parts of public companies. Some of the private-capital is sold to investors as an income producing asset, which often requires a periodic sale of some of their assets. In some cases, this has proven to be difficult because some of their holdings experience difficulties. (While there is some trading of assets between privates, the remaining assets need to be sold to listed companies. This may resemble the old game of musical chairs, where one or more of the ‘safe’ chairs are removed after each round. The remaining chairs will be purchased by the public market, so the private market is dependent on the public market in the end. My concern with regulators encouraging retail investors to put some of their retirement money in private vehicles is that they will be buying into troubled situations.)
The comparison of the “Trump Expansion” with the railroad expansion of the 1880s could be accurate. It was a period of speculative, and in some cases fraudulent activities. Many new issues came to market competing with existing firms, which led to price wars and consequent bankruptcies. The era ended when JP Morgan and others recognized that too much competition was ruinous, resulting in rigorous rounds of mergers. Much money was lost and many communities lost rail service.

Conclusion

We have entered a globally different world. Investors need to study carefully and invest for the long term, periodically choosing not to invest.

Thoughts?

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Was it the week that wasn’t? - Weekly Blog # 917

Mike Lipper's Blog: Recession/Depression Risk Assumptions - Weekly Blog # 916

Mike Lipper's Blog: Risks Are Rising Thru the Clouds - Weekly Blog # 915

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Was it the week that wasn’t? - Weekly Blog # 917

2025-11-30T18:33:00.001-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Was it the week that wasn’t?

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Does 3 ½ US Trading Days make a week?

The bullish media and “street” pundits were thrilled that the 3½ day trading week restored early November losses to the popular stock averages, although they were disappointed the rise did not breakthrough to new highs. Looking at the results, they resembled a week from a younger bull market.

Reality may have been the problem

At least one analyst calculated that if you eliminated all “AI” related activity since 2019 “the market” is probably down. This suggests that since 2019 we have experienced a slowly declining bear market. The Conference Board’s measure of confidence recently dropped to 88.7%, which was more than the expected reading of 93% and the prior reading of 95.5%. HP, the old equipment producer part of Hewlett Packard, joined many other large employers in announcing expectations of a 10% job cut. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey for the last three weeks reported bullish projections of 32.0%, 32.6% and 31.6%, respectively for the next six-months. Their bearish projections remained in the 40-49% range.

Regular subscribers to these blogs have learned of my concerns about the declining quality of balance sheets, a warning sign of economic turmoil. One measure of this is the much larger growth in volume on the NASDAQ vs. the “Big Board”. In the short Friday trading session, the decline in volume on the NASDAQ was twice as large as the percentage decline on the NYSE.

Two Causes of Economic Turmoil

As with the runup to the 1929 crash, the Roaring Twenties led to overconfidence (AI?) and unsound leverage (Private Capital?). The organizational hollowing out is causing an increase in execution risk. Governments, universities, businesses, and families reacting to increasing financial strain are looking to improve efficiencies. Efficiency, not effectiveness, is measured by output vs input. Many have assigned revenues or other outputs to those at both the top and bottom of the production ladder. The people in the middle, mostly supervisors/middle management, have not been credited with the output assigned to those at the top and bottom and have been reduced or eliminated entirely. One glaring example is the federal government, although this trait is found throughout society. The President has had difficulty getting many of his actions approved by the courts. In numerous cases there was insufficient careful staff work, which would have phrased efforts better or would have raised internal discussion instead of simple loyally in attempting to execute flawed orders. This is a pattern exhibited in other organizations.

Thoughts?

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Recession/Depression Risk Assumptions - Weekly Blog # 916

Mike Lipper's Blog: Risks Are Rising Thru the Clouds - Weekly Blog # 915

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Inevitable Recession - Weekly Blog # 914

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Recession/Depression Risk Assumptions - Weekly Blog # 916

2025-11-23T18:14:00.004-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Recession/Depression Risk Assumptions

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Future Probabilities

One intelligent betting task at the New York racetracks, where I learned basic analysis, was to guess the rough size of the gap between the betting pool odds and the probabilities. Only if the self-assessed probabilities were significantly larger than the crowd-determined payment odds, was it a sound wager. I try to apply the same approach to investing in stocks around the world. The easy part is determining the payment odds, which are based on two factors. The popularity shown in the market and guessing the quality of the current stock bulls, which is much more difficult. In general, more retail buying equals lower quality. This is not to equate brains with capital, but the amount of research done. There is an inverse correlation between the amount of media pundit space devoted to an investment and the probability of them being correct. That is not to say the pundits are dumb, they are limited by space and time and that limits their ability to handle complexity.

Determining probabilities often rests on the number of separate supporting elements. This is difficult because unpopular views normally have fewer supporting elements and are more complex. (If this happens then that will happen or at least improve the possibility of it happening.)

I have found that a search of history is useful in searching for probabilities. As there are no axiomatic rules, sometimes something will happen and sometimes it will not. The trick is to try to understand what caused the different outcomes. In dealing with history, we are lucky to have both written and geological records from around the world. From those records it is apparent there are similarities in what drives many critical trends, no matter the place or time-period.

Causes of Recessions

No one wishes for a recession, although we should expect one or at least the possibility of one. When a recession does occur, it is generally a surprise, and most are unprepared for it. In the beginning most don’t recognize they are experiencing a period of decreasing ability to make purchases and the ability to promptly pay debts. Hopefully, the economic community recognizes it soon after the nadir of the recession. The academic community only declares “official” notice of a recession after full recovery of lost resources.

In every recession I have studied, the critical realization of being in a recession occurs when the level of current earnings makes it difficult or temporarily impossible to repay what is owed on time. The squeeze on repayment is caused by an overly optimistic belief in current earnings and the absence of sufficient reserves. These conditions in turn are caused by imprudent personal, business, non-profit, and government decisions. Other causes are sloppy executions, which cause incomplete and wrong actions. Greed also drives actions without regard to consequences. There also appears to be an increase in fraud during a recession.

Causes of a Depression

Depressions are relatively few but longer lasting. For the most part they are caused by attempts to structurally pull the economy out of a recession. Typically, the leader of the government sees that the problems facing society are structural and immediately seeks to fix the problem.

In the US we have had four activist presidents who wanted to structurally change how we operate. These are Andrew Jackson, Thedore and Franklin Roosevelt, plus the current occupant of the White House. These leaders attempted to change many things but ran into opposition from the minority who used the Constitution and courts to block the changes. In addition, their actions created other problems for the country and globally after their terms.

Curren t Conditions

The following elements suggest there are problems ahead. My lens is primarily fixed on market analysis, not economic analysis. (This is due to belief that the market is primarily focused on the perception of future markets and not how past economic data impacts it.)

For the past 2 weeks there have been more declining than rising stock prices on the NYSE and NASDAQ.
For the last two weeks, the AAII sample survey shows only 32.6% and 31.6% bearish for the next 6 months.
Tech stocks listed globally fell last week.
Only 25% of weekly prices reported in the Saturday Wall Street Journal rose, the remaining 75% declined.
Last week through Thursday, my old firm reported that only three mutual fund peer groups out of 104 competitive leagues showed average gains - Dedicated Short +7.80%, Health/Biotech +0.98%, and Indian Regional +0.55%.

My Working Wager

Between now and next Presidential election, the odds on a recession are 60%, with the odds of a depression before 2035 at 50%. (Remember the market rises about 80% of the time.)

Your thoughts, please.

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Risks Are Rising Thru the Clouds - Weekly Blog # 915

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Inevitable Recession - Weekly Blog # 914

Mike Lipper's Blog: Biggest Investment Hurdle: Complexity - Weekly Blog # 913

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Risks Are Rising Thru the Clouds - Weekly Blog # 915

2025-11-16T18:18:00.000-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Risks Are Rising Thru the Clouds

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Overview

There does not appear to be a clear unified picture of the near-term future for the next couple of years. In examining a number of separate and distinct elements, each with their own limited cloudy outlook, I see a growing level of disconnected risks. Hopefully our intelligent subscribers can sense a positive future and share it.

Topics of Concern (In no meaningful order)

The price of gold and crypto elements are rising, with the exchange value of the dollar falling more than 10% earlier this year. For centuries the single greatest attraction of gold was at the coin level, with the ability to bribe one’s exit from one country into another. Today, I am unaware that this is a major demand contributor. The Central banks appear to be the largest buyer, replacing some of the depreciating value of their large dollar holdings. While that might serve a few countries well, there is not enough gold in the world to fill all needs at any reasonable multiplier of current gold prices. Crypto also seems to be potentially price limited. At the moment I do not see any move by major countries to be a substitute replacement for the dollar.
While the Chinese currency is now the third most used currency for world trade, I do not see any willingness of that government to use its currency for anything beyond its own trading. They do not want their currency to trade freely and absorb the turmoil of other countries.
I do not see crypto as an alternative in size, particularly if it is US dollar based. Both gold and crypto don’t have a large industrial use, unlike silver to some degree.
One possible substitute for the dollar is copper, and possibly some other base metals. One new problem for Dr. Copper is the expected increase in use by “AI”. It is interesting to note that Base Materials (Metals) were the second best performing mutual fund category in the current week (+4.44% vs -2.70% for the worst fund category Global Science & Tech.) It may be worth noting that the ECRI industrial price index went to 115.50 from 114.80 the prior week, even though it does not normally move much.
A significant number of casualty insurance companies have invested in private debt vehicles with limited liquidity.
The weekly 6-month forward looking AAII sample survey found only 31.6% bullish and 49.1% bearish compared to three weeks prior, where the readings were 44.05% bullish and 36.9% bearish.
In the current week there were more decliners than gainers on the NYSE and NASDAQ.
A number of economists have noted that the top 10% of the population, often over 75 years old, own 50% of US wealth. The bottom one third, those who are 35 years old or younger, own 10%. (This may well explain the results of the only two governor elections this year.) This formation is being called “K shaped”.

I appeal to our readers to contribute your good thinking regarding the importance of these elements and to let me know how it affects your view on the global stock and money markets.

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Inevitable Recession - Weekly Blog # 914

Mike Lipper's Blog: Biggest Investment Hurdle: Complexity - Weekly Blog # 913

Mike Lipper's Blog: Signals of Change in Historic Patterns - Weekly Blog # 912

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

The Inevitable Recession - Weekly Blog # 914

2025-11-09T21:29:00.001-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

The Inevitable Recession

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Loses Are Needed

Securities analysts, portfolio managers, investors, politicians, and others, need the fear and reality of recessions. Both written and geological history record meaningful and painful declines. Since they happen with some regularity there must be a repetitive set of reasons, with the lure of a gain sucking us into overexpansion and other error-making decisions.

Humans evolved from hunters and/or gathers, who periodically generated supplies beyond their immediate need, beyond a limited reserve for emergencies. When they gathered too much, costs grew and quality suffered. In the financial world we hoard and or borrow too much in the way of financial assets. This became increasingly clear as conditions changed.

These adverse conditions are clear in recorded history, in Babylon, China, and other places. Thus, the history of weather, business, and political cycles were written, becoming critical drivers of financial markets.

The Rise of Financial Analysis

Trading markets began soon after communities were established. Over time, it became clear that some successful traders achieved periodic, large returns on their use of trading capital. A number of these people gained reputations as good traders and found other people who recognized they did not have the same skills, contacts, and capital. These traders could borrow money at attractive rates and could charge fees to manage portfolios for selected outsiders. A number of these traders evolved into investment banks, who had both skilled traders and statisticians, some of whom became analysts.

US and UK Governments vs. Fraud

When markets fall, investors don't blame themselves for the losses they sustain. They claim fraud on the part of the "system", which includes issuers, exchanges, underwriters, and salespeople. Generally, the public investor does not understand business and financial cycles or chooses to forget the warnings that were given before they placed purchase orders. To protect the "public", disclosure and other laws were passed. While no law or regulation can prevent bad judgement, disclosures can ensure investors receive what is required to be transmitted to them. Unfortunately, accounting and legal disclosures use terms that the public does not understand.

As a result of large losses sustained by US public investors in the 1930s, there were seven reform laws passed, including the Securities & Exchange Act and a similar set of regulations in the UK.

The Development of Securities Analysis

While there were numerous books written about investing prior to the 1929 crash, they were not read by many investors. In the early 1930s Benjamin Graham and David Dodd wrote a Securities Analysis textbook for a Columbia University course. (Ben was a portfolio manager and Dave Dodd was a professor, who was still teaching in the late 1950s when I took the course from him.) Their main lesson was how to think about investing in securities while minimizing losing money. The course was taught as a supplement to a number of accounting and business law courses. They largely used the reconstruction of financial statements to assist patient investors. (While useful in minimizing investment losses, creating language to allow people to understand the thinking of others and the politics of an industry or client would have been more valuable.)

Recession Analysis

I believe most of those in the market are assessing the probability of an oncoming recession by focusing on published economic data. The stock market is focused on the future, not the past, and in that way it’s ahead of the economics releases. For example, the election results of last Tuesday suggest Louis XIV’s building of Versailles, even though no one else is saying it. The King was always at war, usually with England, and ran up big debts. He destroyed the local power of the nobility and insisted they spend most of their time attending to him in the Palace. (Is the reaction to larger than expected Democratic margins of victory in New Jersey and Virginia and the destruction of part of the White House for a big ballroom similar to what Louis XIV set in motion before the French Revolution and Napolean?)

Other market indicators last week included decliners on both the NYSE and NASDAQ being larger than gainers, with the NASDAQ losing twice as much as the gainers. NASDAQ's volume over the last year increased 38.21% vs the NYSE volume gaining 22.98%. (One of the clues to identifying a peak and then a decline is a decline in "quality", which is better evidenced on the balance sheet than through earnings.)

On Friday, the best performing mutual fund categories in rank order were Currency funds, Precious Metals Funds, Real Estate Funds, Natural Resource Funds, and Materials Producers. All are not heavily held by funds and other institutional holders. On a year-to-date basis, the only fund categories that beat the S&P 500 Funds Index category were Science & Tech, Precious Metals, Global Science & Tech, and Large-Cap Growth. (There is considerable overlap in the names in their portfolios). Barron's weekly list of foreign market indices showed 5 Asian markets up, with only 1 rising in Europe.

Identifying the date when a recession begins is officially only determined after it ends. As a practical matter you might use the purchasing managers' index, which has been in contraction for the last 8 months and is now showing only 42.3% rising. While it is foolish- to name both a market direction and a date, it may be useful to be aware that the market generally rises at least 80% of the time. Considering the 5-year average length of time CEOs remain in their chair, it suggests a market decline once every five years, which somewhat parallels the 4-year length of a US President's term. (I don't know how to adjust the number for the current President but possibly averaging all Presidents it may be around five years.)

Working Conclusion:

The odds of a recession before the next Presidential election is probably 67%, with a depression at 50%. (The latter would require some mismanagement during the recession to raise the odds of a depression above 50%.)

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Biggest Investment Hurdle: Complexity - Weekly Blog # 913

Mike Lipper's Blog: Signals of Change in Historic Patterns - Weekly Blog # 912

Mike Lipper's Blog: Where Are US Stock Prices Going? - Weekly Blog # 911

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Biggest Investment Hurdle: Complexity - Weekly Blog # 913

2025-11-02T18:51:00.001-05:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Biggest Investment Hurdle: Complexity

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

First Priority

An investment priority should be logging changes to your investment policies, although most investors do not maintain such records. To paraphrase the late and great Charlie Munger said that Warren Buffett was a learning machine. His point was, Warren benefited from the losses he sustained. He had an investment history of making very few repeated mistakes.

Most profitable investors also make relatively few mistakes, in part due to most mistakes forfeiting more opportunities than money. To avoid future mistakes, it would be helpful to have an insightful roster of mistakes. The real painful mistakes are repeaters.

Tools of Repeating Errors

Many repeating errors of judgement rely on an automatic mathematical response. For example, if “x” happens then do “y”. This is a non-thinking action. It does not adjust for changes in critical conditions that might impact the current situation.

On a very basic level, buying is different than selling. Investment buying is often based on market prices being wrong but are likely to change soon. The seller on the other hand believes in the relative attractiveness of a security that will shortly decline in price. In both cases the investor believes that he/she is ahead of the bulk of the investment market. These are the actions of someone who wants to be among the leaders. This is in direct conflict with successful investors who prefer to be lonely and contrary to the crowd.

Understanding Complexity

Berkshire Hathaway (*) developed a system of categorizing new investment information into three buckets, “yes, no, too hard”. Berkshire’s advantage was structured on the combined experience of the late Mr. Munger and Mr. Buffett. This experience included knowledge of over 60 different companies they owned and the knowledge of various securities they previously owned or looked at for more than 100 years combined. Where most others saw complexity, they saw investment opportunity.

(* Berkshire Hathaway shares are owned in client and personal accounts.)

Can’t Avoid Complexity

In the modern global world, one cannot avoid complexity. However, with some hard work and experience you can reorder many elements into positives, negatives, and judgements to be determined. With this structure one can put odds on each critical item, leading to a preponderance of positives or negatives worthy of action.

An example of factors that surfaced this week in the media are shown below:

Wall Street Journal Headline “Foreign Stocks outperform S&P…”. This could cause many US accounts to add foreign stocks and funds. However, the largest collection of stocks that Americans buy are multinational stocks listed overseas. In many cases the largest portion of these portfolios are invested in US operations, which is a negative if your purpose is to participate in European and Asian growth. (The same could be said about US listed multinationals with significant sales abroad. This includes Coca Cola, a large holding of Berkshire. The same could be said about Apple.)
The Federal Reserve is concerned about a bifurcated economy consisting of technology and older companies. Both sides have significant foreign sales.
This may be the wrong time for the proposed cut in bank supervision. Both banks and non-bank financials are increasing loans to lower-quality companies.
While some believe oil is being priced attractively, natural gas prices are even more attractive. Also, Copper has historically performed better than gold.
The “Buffett Premium” is disappearing just as insurance driven earnings are very strong.
Cash in portfolios should be used in the short term, either as a basket to buy favored stocks or to reduce exposure to over-capitalized companies and increase return on equity.
In latest week there were more declining stocks than rising stocks.

Each of the mentioned items could be attractive buy or sell opportunities, depending on one’s view.

What do you think?

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Signals of Change in Historic Patterns - Weekly Blog # 912

Mike Lipper's Blog: Where Are US Stock Prices Going? - Weekly Blog # 911

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Good Time to Sell? - Weekly Blog # 910

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Signals of Change in Historic Patterns - Weekly Blog # 912

2025-10-26T16:42:00.000-04:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Signals of Change in Historic Patterns

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Past Trends May Not Predict Future

There are times when using an old playbook is dangerous because the game has changed.

Inputs of Change

China overtook the US as Germany’s largest trading partner (fear of US tariffs?).
Meta cuts 600 jobs in their AI division.
Market rally is being led by low quality.
Consumer sentiment fell to 53.6 from 55.1 the prior month
Home ownership 40% more costly than renting. Will it change?

Other structural questions:

Is political power out of balance? IBES estimates 3rd quarter eps to be 10.4% and net income 8.8%, which to use?
Will later marriages and down-sizing earlier reduce demand for homes?
Will China follow the US in reducing competition through merger or bankruptcy? (autos/paints/investment and commercial banks/private capital).

Will we change schooling into education of life and business skills to help solve our problems.

Disclosure:

My personal portfolio of domestic and international securities assumes some of the answers to these questions. I could be wrong.

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Where Are US Stock Prices Going? - Weekly Blog # 911

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Good Time to Sell? - Weekly Blog # 910

Mike Lipper's Blog: Risks: Recession/Cyclical, Depression/Structural - Weekly Blog # 909

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Where Are US Stock Prices Going? - Weekly Blog # 911

2025-10-19T18:19:00.001-04:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Where Are US Stock Prices Going?

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Time to Achieve

The old rule for publishers regarding future projections is to never state both a target number and a date certain. However, the result of that warning is a relatively useless projection for planning current actions. Unfortunately, I have views on both the target number and approximate timing, although neither are precise nor tied together. In this blog I share my thoughts with the hope that some are of value, and our trusted readers will share what they think are reasonable answers.

As a racetrack trained analyst, I believe the odds favor the US stock market reaching a multi-year peak in the foreseeable future. Consequently, my grandchildren and great-grandchildren will likely see nominal gains in their assets long-term. Careful readers will quickly surmise that I must have mixed views regarding my children’s market wealth prospects. Their results will be heavily influenced by their controlled spending and financial diligence, and what they want to leave to their heirs.

Current Market Dilemma

Most of the time a single investment attitude drives market prices. Today, there are two dominant thought patterns. The first is enthusiastic buyers who largely believe the President is in the process of restructuring the economy and therefore society. However, he is at a disadvantage of having only loyalists support him. (Loyalists generally do not pursue details of potential execution problems or even try to identify them to reduce political, functional, and court issues.) They think things are going well.

The second group is reluctant to make decisive decisions in the market. The $8 trillion in money market funds is one measure of their non-acceptance of things going well. Cash or similar investments are both a repository for normal operating reserves and future buying pools.

Incomplete Evidence

Tariff impact: Consumers 55%, importers 22%, foreign producers 18%, and 5% evaded. (I suspect until tariffs are removed consumers will pay at least 90% of them, either in aggregate prices and/or in quality/quantitative shrinkage.)
While the media and uninformed public focus on the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) volume and prices, they are missing a critical change in stock market structure. The year-over-year share volume has increased 40.88% for the NYSE and 80.55% for the NASDAQ, effectively double. (To some degree the NASDAQ volume includes inter-dealer trades to restore trading inventory positions.) Sometimes the two markets act differently. For example, on Friday the NYSE volume of advancing prices rose, as did total volume from Thursday. However, NASDAQ activity was the opposite, with lower volume and more decliners than gainers. A larger measure of the market is the Standard & Poor’s 500 (S&P 500), which is very near an all-time high.
In the weekly survey sample of the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII), the percentage of respondents predicting a bullish market for the next six months dropped to 33.7%, while those predicting a bearish market rose to 46.1%. Just three weeks ago the ratios were 42.9% vs 39.2% in favor of the bulls.
The current market and political situation resemble those of the late 1920s, which led to both the recession and depression. Both started with an overall increase in debt at the individual and business level. This was particularly true in the politically sensitive farm community, which was suffering from a change in foreign demand for its crops. (This time it’s a Chinese decline in demand for soybeans.) Small and medium-sized banks were having loan payment problems, which then led to imposing tariffs on foreign products and services. The current Federal Reserve Board is very conscious of this history.
Another parallel is certain foreign governments recognizing the relative weakness of America and taking advantage of the situation by threatening further actions. This week Ruth and I spent time with the leaders of the US Marine Corps University who are preparing for a future different than the past. Similar efforts occurred before WWI and WWII, suggesting investors should think about structural changes to their investment policies.

Building a larger cash opportunity reserve may make sense. What do you think?

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Good Time to Sell? - Weekly Blog # 910

Mike Lipper's Blog: Risks: Recession/Cyclical, Depression/Structural - Weekly Blog # 909

Mike Lipper's Blog: Tactical Headlines Show Strategic Clues - Weekly Blog # 908

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

A Good Time to Sell? - Weekly Blog # 910

2025-10-12T21:14:00.000-04:00

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

A Good Time to Sell?

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Selling is More Important

When an investor, distinct from a trader, asks me if they should sell some portion or all of their holdings, I first try to determine the critical time period in judging the results of the action. If one is persuaded by media voices the answer will usually be tomorrow or at the end of the calendar year. For me, it is when the money is expected to be needed. For example, for my newborn great grandchildren's retirement or the replacement of the new university dorm, it could be a 100-years. Another matrix could be the future low price point needed to protect future funding of a desired goal.

Regarding a future low price point, it is important to recognize that prices move in cycles. The important cycles can be labeled as seasonal, cyclical, secular, and structural. It is how I think of the latter part of last week’s drop in prices, where what I follow fell -15% to gains of +7%. To conserve your time and the blog's space I will comment on the year-to-date period for those impressed with media voices and include some other screens as well.

The first thing that hit me was the largest average gain of +15.94% in non-leveraged, diversified large growth mutual funds. These gains were driven by the biggest positions in technology stocks. However, they missed out by focusing on securities registered with the Securities Exchange Commission. After many years of SEC registered stocks performing very well, there were some foreign markets that generated much better performance multiples. The leading countries were Ghana +130.25%, Cyprus +94.75%, Luxembourg +74.8%, Greece +71.45%, Columbia +70.05%, Nigeria +65.1%, Korea +61.1%, South Africa +48.02%, China +32.85% and Chile +31.02%. Weekly Barron's performance charts showing 14 European and 7 Asian countries had 7 Asian and 4 European indices gaining. (As an analyst that has followed non-US stocks and invested in some, I believe this is a good time to examine these opportunities.)

Most Analysts Focus on Rising Stocks

I glanced at those stock prices not doing so well. For example, the Dow Jones Industrials (DJIA) and Dow Jones Transportation (DJTA) stocks fell -2.739 and -4.88% respectively for the week. Perhaps more importantly, their year-to-date performance results were +6.90% and -5.21% respectively. (This suggests the US goods economy is not doing well. Tariffs could be a problem. Freight movement is down for both the rail and truck business and may forecast Halloween and Christmas sales being behind earlier expectations.)

Down Prices = Opportunities

Three industry sectors are showing small declines on a year-to-date basis: Banks -4.26%, Insurance -1.64% and small companies -1.1%. Restrictions on all companies are the same, but small companies may be impacted more due to their staff size. To the extent the current administration reduces some of the regulatory overhead, it cou1d restore a competitive advantage to smaller companies. However, many restrictions on smaller financial and insurance companies appear to make it easier for new entrants.

AI, An Unrecognized National Problem

Some are beginning to comment on the absence of large profits from Artificial Intelligence companies due to lack of public discovery of relevant financial disclosure, so I will not. At a recent meeting hosted by the London Stock Exchange Group, one of their headline speakers noted that the challenge for the AI industry was to produce "more with less". It is well recognized that AI is taking over an unidentified number of job functions, reducing the need for human labor. Great! Where are these laid off people going to get jobs anywhere near similar wages? This could be a concern for future Administrations.

The 4th Activist President

Just like Andrew Jackson and the two Roosevelts, President Trump is trying to solve various national problems by changing how they are handled. Some of these attempts will survive the Courts. What I am not seeing is how the restructuring of the economy will work. Looking at the aftereffects of prior activist Presidents, I suspect it will materially change the outlook for investments, something people are not currently focusing on.

I would like to know if anyone has any thoughts on what restructuring will mean to their investment orientation.

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Tactical Headlines Show Strategic Clues - Weekly Blog # 908

Mike Lipper's Blog: Anticipation Pays; Deliveries May Not - Weekly Blog # 907

Mike Lipper's Blog: Selected and Casual Road Notes - Weekly Blog # 906

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Mike Lipper's Blog

Is History Rhyming Again? - Weekly Blog # 934

Comments

Related Stories

Bifocal Analysis: Short & Long-Term - Weekly Blog # 933

Comments

Related Stories

This week’s Dichotomy/Bifocals Needed - Weekly Blog # 932

Comments

Related Stories

Premature: Buying Program to Begin Soon? - Weekly Blog # 931

Comments

Related Stories

Expectations Changing? - Weekly Blog # 930

Comments

Related Stories

Diversification - Weekly Blog # 929

Comments

Related Stories

To Win Long-Term, Learn From Great Presidents - Weekly Blog # 928

Comments

Related Stories

Strategically, Time to Think Differently - Weekly Blog # 927

Comments

Related Stories

Do Current Prices Lead Future Markets? - Weekly Blog # 926

Comments

Related Stories

Failed Expectations: Do Details Count? Zig-Zag Flips - Weekly Blog # 925

Comments

Related Stories

Is This The Week That Ends Instability? - Weekly Blog # 924

How Much Longer Can We Avoid Thinking About the Long-Term? - Weekly Blog # 923

Data May Be Signaling Change - Weekly Blog # 922

Investment Time Horizon Should Pick How You Measure the Results - Weekly Blog # 921

Tis the Season of Joy & Reflection - Weekly Blog # 920

Are Investors Seeing a Change? Politicos Are Not - Weekly Blog # 919

On The Way To Casualties & Eventually Riches - Weekly Blog # 918

Was it the week that wasn’t? - Weekly Blog # 917

Recession/Depression Risk Assumptions - Weekly Blog # 916

Risks Are Rising Thru the Clouds - Weekly Blog # 915

The Inevitable Recession - Weekly Blog # 914

Biggest Investment Hurdle: Complexity - Weekly Blog # 913

Signals of Change in Historic Patterns - Weekly Blog # 912

Where Are US Stock Prices Going? - Weekly Blog # 911

A Good Time to Sell? - Weekly Blog # 910