Craig Primis and Michael Francus of Kirkland & Ellis.
Partner Craig Primis called the case “an important step in ensuring that states do not cavalierly seize people’s property under absurdly low burdens of proof that stack the deck against defendants."
October 21, 2019 at 12:01 AM
1 minute read
Editor and columnist at The Litigation Daily
I admit, I have a tiny soft spot for asset forfeiture cases because I find their captions amusing—i.e. “United States v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins” or “State of Texas v. 12 Gold Coins.”
But there’s nothing funny about State of North Dakota v. 2003 Chevrolet Silverado (OK well except possibly the name).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
