Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to continue reading.
Six of the nine Native American tribes in South Dakota have now voted to ban Gov. Kristi Noem from their lands.
The Yankton Sioux Tribe Business and Claims Committee voted unanimously on Friday to ban the governor, citing her comments about drug cartels, Native American children and what one tribal council member characterized as performative rather than substantive efforts to engage tribal leaders.
The committee is the primary elected body for the Yankton Sioux Tribe, whose lands are situated in southeastern South Dakota.
“It’s about standing in solidarity together, all the Oceti Sakowin,” said Council Member Ryan Cournoyer, referencing the name for speakers of the Lakota, Dakota and Nakota languages.
Earlier this week, the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate voted to bar the governor from the Lake Traverse Reservation for similar reasons. Previously voting to ban Noem were the Oglala, Rosebud, Cheyenne River and Standing Rock Sioux tribes.
Calls and messages to the leadership of the remaining tribes in the state — the Flandreau Santee, Crow Creek and Lower Brule Sioux tribes — were not immediately returned Friday.
Gov. Noem’s spokespeople also did not offer an immediate response to the Yankton Sioux Tribe’s vote. Noem has been busy reacting to the fallout from her new book, “No Going Back,” in which she sparked a national backlash by revealing she had fatally shot a dog and a goat. Noem also faced criticism for claiming in the book that she had met North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un — a claim she and the book’s publisher ultimately retracted.
Beyond tribal solidarity, Cournoyer told South Dakota Searchlight that the governor’s comments during town halls in Mitchell and Winner earlier this year were particularly offensive.
In Mitchell, speaking of tribes, Noem said, “Their kids don’t have any hope. They don’t have parents who show up and help them. They have a tribal council or a president who focuses on a political agenda more than they care about actually helping somebody’s life look better.”
Comments suggesting that Mexican drug cartels have “set up shop” on the state’s reservations have been a sticking point since her delivery of a speech about the U.S. border with Mexico on Jan. 31. Since the speech, delivered to a joint session of the South Dakota Legislature, the governor has written an op-ed column titled “banish the cartels” and claimed without offering evidence that tribal leadership is “personally benefitting” from the cartels.
Noem also angered some tribal leaders during a meeting between the tribes and the federal government in early April in Rapid City. The meeting was about Pè Sla, a stretch of prairie land in the Black Hills considered sacred by the tribes.
She hadn’t been invited, and Oglala Sioux Tribal Council President Frank Star Comes Out criticized her surprise arrival as an unwelcome distraction and a “publicity stunt” meant to bolster her chance at becoming Donald Trump’s vice presidential running mate.
Cournoyer was at that meeting and said the governor “charging in there” with her team made her words about working with tribes to solve problems ring hollow.
“It was more for the media than to show she wanted to work with us,” he said.
South Dakota Searchlight is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. South Dakota Searchlight maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Seth Tupper for questions: info@southdakotasearchlight.com. Follow South Dakota Searchlight on Facebook and Twitter.
Success! An email has been sent to with a link to confirm list signup.
Error! There was an error processing your request.
(7) comments
You can tell the rez has democrat slant. They get angry at truth.
Well said.
If I was Gov. Noem. I would bring in 50-60,000 migrants to the Rez. Nothing like competition to stimulate area economy. Infuse new DNA into population. After all migrants simply want better life are industrious. Could educate Natives to what hard times are.
That would be a good place for them.
There is more drugs in indian country than people know. Late nite traffic on rural roads is overwhelming. No accountability for Federal funds. Inbeselment. Crime. Murder. There is no hope for kids when they are raised ny no one, maybe a grandparent becouse the parent is high or in jail. A few thousand illegal per tribe is needed. They want to be a soveran nation then maybe they should syart acting like it and support themserves with business and industry, not just casinos and pot shops. Dont want a govenor on your getto land, how about cutting state and federal funding, support yourself. Go back to living in a skin hut riding a horse and walking and chase your food with a stick and a club. Get ride of your free goverment cell phone, No more IHS free health care. If you are such a proud and friendly people, cleanup your act and be respectful if you are truly what you proclaim.
I agree. Stop all the free stuff like we owe you.
Montana reservations are begging for help. They state cartels have nearly taken over. Yet they seem to drive on by SoDak rez on way to Montana and elsewhere. It a Meracle!!! But reality is they are Democrat and can't handle the truth. But i guessing the Chief and his family has well stuffed bank account. Or shoeboxes of 100'. Move migrants and turn them loose. Breed the democrats right out.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.