My sister gave me a copy of this book with enthusiastic urging to read and follow it's arguments. Kennedy’s writing is his strength – tragically, it is employed to sell and gloss over superficial and flawed analysis and conclusions.Pros:1) The writing is efficient, crisp, and engaging …Makes his points quickly.2) Lot’s of charts, graphics, and tables3) Over 239 listed sources tagged when used in narrative – aids fact checkingCons:1) His central assertions are all contradicted a. He is censored – yet his books and interviews are widely available b. COVID Vaccines are ineffective and actually harmful - widely contradicted by his own sources, as well as my own mild analysis and fact-checking (see attached)2) His spare writing style lends itself to cherry-picking and omission3) The font used is so small It is hard to read even with reading glasses4) The numerous graphics are ludicrously small, and illegible without a strong magnifier5) Some graphics are further degraded in the conversion from color original to the book’s greyscaleFor instance, here are a few problems I see in Chapter 1...He uses a lot of charts, tables, and graphics - which I normally like. But he has shrunk them down so much that they are unreadable without strong magnification. Forget about reading glasses - you need phone in magnifier mode or a magnifying glass. The sources for the charts on page 8 of the book were designed in color but in the book are rendered in greyscale ...so the seven color chart inadvertently becomes three shades of grey. Thankfully, he gives the source – the CDC. I went to the CDC site and recreated the chart (just USA part) with their latest data (see third picture attached here). Even with full color shading, it is not that clear what if any correlation there is. I plotted the same data on an X-Y graph (see 1st picture attached here) and a correlation clearly emerges: States with higher vaccination rates have had low COVID death rates - essentially opposite of Kennedy's assertion.He states that South Korea and Australia had record spike in COVID Cases after widespread vaccination. But these two countries in 2020 before vaccinations were available, had extremely low Cases – an order of magnitude lower than in the USA. So, their record spikes were still very tiny. South Korea and Australia adopted some of the most aggressive COVID containment policies anywhere: Testing, Quarantining, Masking, Contact tracing. They did these much quicker and far more extensively than was done in the USA. These measures were relaxed after vaccines became available…. It seems plausible that these aggressive TQMC actions were more effective in suppressing COVID than vaccination combined with relaxed TQMC... resulting in the "record" but tiny late spikes.On page 7 Kennedy states that “there is meager scientific evidence that vaccines reduce COVID infections or deaths". But what about the easily googled clinical trials in 2020? Pfizer’s included ~40K subjects… the group receiving placebo developed 162 cases of COVID verses the vaccinated group developing only 8 cases. Kennedy cherry-picks data from CDC, NIH, and John-Hopkin but when I look at their data unfiltered by Kennedy, it seems to show extensive and varied data overwhelmingly indicating significant (but not perfect) efficacy of COVID vaccines - again, see attachments.