 Patent Law Weblog By Kevin E. Noonan -- Only a few days after the one-year anniversary of hearing oral argument, the Federal Circuit handed down its decision in Regents of the University of California v. Broad Institute, Inc. on Monday. The opinion reviewed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision in Interference No. 106,115 between Senior Party the Broad Institute, Harvard University, and MIT (collectively, "Broad") and against Junior Party the University of California/Berkeley, the University of Vienna, and Emmanuelle Charpentier (collectively "CVC" before the PTAB, here, "Regents") over CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) technology for gene editing. To briefly recap,... 
Content mobilized by FeedBlitz RSS Services, the premium FeedBurner alternative. |
