It seems, then, that we need another signal that can add precision to our introspection. And that signal is as follows: we are more likely to be lying to ourselves when we are engaging in internal monologue.

An internal monologue is the experience of having concrete, “narration-style” thoughts as opposed to passive experiences. This argument maybe doesn’t apply to people with a constant internal monologue, or those who have none. But it seems like most people’s internal lives are some combination of subconscious thought and active monologue: most of our day-to-day moments are spent instinctively receiving and reacting to external stimuli, but in certain moments — e.g. when faced with difficult choices that require serious deliberation — our thoughts morph into something that resembles language as we try to articulate our feelings and ask ourselves questions.

This is more likely to happen when there’s a divergence between your actual feelings and what you want your feelings to be.

Here is more from Elizabeth Li, via Tejas.

The post Conscious introspection leads to more self-deception? appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

       

Comments

• In reply to Engineer. I would say, serious deliberation is a ... by Student
• In reply to Mike in Va. Me too. I full blown conversations ... by Student
• In reply to L. Good comment. I think part of the problem is ... by Student
• So Marcus Aurelius was just lying to himself when he wrote his ... by F. E. Guerra-Pujol (prior probability)
• This is why Narrative Therapy can be useful – it helps ... by Logan
• Plus 10 more...

Related Stories

• Repugnant Economics
• Revealing Life Preferences Through LLMs
• Philosophical Ideas Behind Their Time

 

2. Roon.

3. Do economics and finance assessment for AI models at Mercor.

4. Are we underestimating health care sector productivity?

5. Can AI replace human counselors at scale?

6. Nan on nascent philanthropy.  Recommended, very important.  It focuses on what an additional $50 billion in philanthropic spending might look like, and asks where the talent will come from.

7. Chennai has the only surviving handwritten newspaper in the world?

The post Wednesday assorted links appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

       

Comments

• In reply to Rando. Tyler also talks about, people, places, ... by RAD
• In reply to mkt42. Talk about mood affiliation 😉 by RAD
• In reply to Hazel Meade. Grimes, is that you? by RAD
• In reply to Ted Craig. Ahhh, Yann LeCun's cat Intelligence ... by RAD
• 2. Rokos basilisk. He's just sucking up. by Hazel Meade
• Plus 10 more...

 

Hi folks, appreciate the discussion of the piece here, as ever.

I just wanted to chime in briefly with an analogy that speaks to one of the ways I think about the causal mechanism here, and to my mind pushes back against the argument that since past declines in fertility didn’t come from smartphones etc the current decline can’t either.

• ⁠In the past, weight loss generally came from sustained dieting and exercise
•⁠  ⁠⁠Now it overwhelmingly comes from injecting GLP-1s
•⁠  ⁠⁠In the same way that GLP-1s are a technological shock that amplifies/accelerates the old mechanism (eating less), social media is a technological shock that amplifies/accelerates the old mechanism (cultural change)

To my mind one of the ways (possibly the main way) that phones and social media could be affecting fertility is by accelerating and internationalising pre-existing trends of cultural change. One example could be young women’s sense of empowerment and independence, which was on the rise in many parts of the world but has sped up over the past decade or two (I would point to my previous work on the ideological gender divide as one piece of evidence here) and has spread rapidly to regions and cultures that were surely very unlikely to reach this point without exposure to western social media.

Thoughts?

I will add one point on this debate, noting I do not think it runs counter to Burn-Murdoch.  Some commentators are insisting that what really matters is how many children survive to adulthood, not how many are born in the first place.  But both numbers matter a good deal.  Every time a woman gets pregnant she incurs significant costs, especially in older times when death in childbirth was common, or even death or health problems from a miscarriage were a much greater risk.  Furthermore, if you tried for seven kids, but only expected three or four to survive, a lot of times more than three or four survived.  So general survival of all or almost all your children had to be a palatable option, even if the expected value was lower than that.

The post John Burn-Murdoch on phones and fertility appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

       

Comments

• In reply to Wayfaring Stranger. Ha! I am not arguing for ... by Lord Action
• In reply to Lord Action. Once you hit six why stop? Assuming ... by Wayfaring Stranger
• One interesting thing here and not quite where the author was ... by JC
• In reply to Gilligan. Right, yeah, there's this thing I used ... by Hazel Meade
• In reply to Sure. “”how many people choose not to have ... by Lord Action
• Plus 10 more...

Related Stories

• Dwarkesh in the Datacenter
• Revealing Life Preferences Through LLMs
• The Impact of AI-Generated Text on the Internet

 

Tajikistan’s remittances are worth nearly half the country’s GDP—

In Tajikistan, remittances — the money sent or brought back by migrants — amounted to 48% of GDP in 2024. The chart places this figure in context by comparing it with other countries with data for the same year. Nicaragua and Honduras receive remittances worth around a quarter of their GDP — high by global standards, but still far below Tajikistan’s level. Remittances here include two types of flows: money migrants abroad send home to their families, and money cross-border workers bring home from short-term jobs abroad.

Both of these flows play a role in Tajikistan, where most remittances come from labor migrants in Russia. In addition to the roughly 400,000 Tajiks settled there, hundreds of thousands more cross the border for seasonal and short-term work.

According to a report from the International Organization for Migration, about 1.2 million Tajiks were in Russia in mid-2024, which is more than a tenth of Tajikistan’s total population.

The World Bank’s latest Tajikistan Economic Update says that much of the country’s recent rapid economic growth (above 8% since 2021) was supported by these remittance inflows.

That is from Our World in Data, with a picture at the link.

The post Tajikistan fact of the day appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

       

Comments

• TC has likely discussed this before, but I'd love a post on the ... by DP
• In reply to Bill Allen. In limited cases yes, but how good ... by mkt42
• In reply to EBUG. I’m making over $7k a month working part ... by Editha Reynolds
• Fighting in the Russian army, perhaps? by Tom T.
• I was in Tajikistan in the late 1990s. I don't want to malign ... by ElsieT
• Plus 10 more...

Related Stories

• Who is losing out in marriage market competition?
• Why I am skeptical on the relationship between smart phones and fertility
• Dwarkesh in the Datacenter

 

The emergence of firms like SpaceX and Blue Origin has made space a leading example of how private enterprise drives innovation, marking what many see as a sharp break between Old Space and New Space. Yet little systematic evidence documents when the transition to this new phase of space innovation occurred and which firms drove it. We use patent data to provide this measurement and find that the largest surge in space innovation occurred in the 1990s, coinciding with demand-side market creation, and preceding the entry of high-profile startups after 2005. Throughout this period and since, incumbent aerospace firms account for most of the space-related patenting, with entrants contributing a growing but minority share. The same geographic regions that dominated space innovation during the post-Apollo era remain dominant today. These patterns are consistent with directed technical change: incumbents direct R&D toward policy-created markets accessible from existing capabilities, while entrants bring science-based insights into domains requiring new paradigms. Our findings suggest that New Space is more closely connected to Old Space than prevailing narratives imply, and that government’s most consequential role in space innovation may lie in constructing appropriable markets. We make patent data on space-related technologies available for future research.

That is from a recent NBER working paper by Ruben Gaetani & Alexander T. Whalley.

The post Old space policy vs. new space policy appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

       

Comments

• In reply to Hazel Meade. “Government, in total, is like 20 ... by Lord Action
• In reply to Hazel Meade. “Sorry I should say ... by Lord Action
• In reply to Hazel Meade. Sorry I should say “government” ... by Hazel Meade
• In reply to Hazel Meade. “My point is simply that Starlink ... by Lord Action
• In reply to Ricardo. “Elon Musk's business savvy married to ... by Lord Action
• Plus 10 more...

 

2. JFV on smart phones as accelerators of fertility declines.

3. Maryland markets in everything.

4. Polling Chinese on a top one hundred books.

5. From the excellent Samir Varma, could alien drone probes decelerate in time?  And here is analysis from GPT.

6. “I am thrilled to announce the launch of Totei.com. Totei is a magazine devoted to craft and craftsmanship in all its forms. The name Totei comes from the ancient Japanese word for apprentice.”  From Gaurav Kapadia.

7. The young seem to like AI the least.

8. NYT obituary for Edmund Phelps.

The post Tuesday assorted links appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

       

Comments

• In reply to James Harris. ... by James Harris
• The Varma piece on UAPs is excellent. As is the ChatGPT ... by James Harris
• In reply to Frank. Human or AI, the first two paragraphs ... by Some Toronto Guy
• In reply to JNM. “There was lots of life, but no ... by Anonymous
• In reply to BC. It's not about AI taking jobs, it's about ... by Anonymous
• Plus 10 more...

 

My case study was acting. Acting was considered repugnant for over 2,000 years. In Rome, actors could not vote, hold office, or be trusted to give an oath in legal proceedings. So why don’t we find acting repugnant today?

One lesson: weighing costs and benefits is not enough. Roth discusses empirical research showing that legalizing prostitution cut STDs and sexual assaults—against prostitutes and others. But evidence alone won’t shift a repugnance norm. You also have to reframe the activity. Acting, for example was reframed from body rental to a skill requiring intelligence, training and ability. So I went out of my way to say that I am a fan of Aella—though not her only fan—and that I see no reason why escorting should not be considered a skill, requiring intelligence, training, and ability. I can think of few better ways of raising social welfare than making sex 10% better!

I also spoke on human challenge trials. Roth and I agree: challenge trials could have sped up COVID vaccines and saved tens of thousands of lives. We should be angry this didn’t happen. Why didn’t it? Even though most people think human challenge trials are a good idea, there was a repugnance bottleneck because the minority who did find human challenge trials repugnant were in charge. I discuss how to change this.

Al leads the discussion. My comments start at 25:15.

The post Repugnant Economics appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

       

Comments

• In reply to JP. Alex is a well-paid academic economist who ... by Anti-Gnostic
• In reply to Engineer. Firefly had the same theme. So did ... by Anti-Gnostic
• In reply to anon. If it's not a good idea for your kids it's ... by Anti-Gnostic
• In reply to Larry Siegel. Lots of possibilities: Treating ... by mgregoire
• In reply to anon. From the OP: “But evidence alone won’t ... by mgregoire
• Plus 10 more...

Related Stories

• Dwarkesh in the Datacenter
• Hayek in Jacobin
• Christopher Nolan, Straussian?

 

It is important to distinguish between the positive side of wokeism and the unreasonable side. The positive side supported gay rights and discouraged racism in the public sphere. The unreasonable side brought us cancel culture, stifled discussion, insisted on very particular views of race and gender identity, boosted DEI and other race-discriminatory policies, and generally made America a more intolerant place. It was most of all about who had the right to steer the agenda of public discourse, and who had the right to push out dissenters.

The unreasonable side, since it was about power and control, had negative vibes built into its core. Fortunately, American society pushed back against many of the most objectionable manifestations of those negative vibes, but did we get rid of the negative vibes themselves? I do not think so. The American people still seem pretty low in trust, unhappy with America’s position in the world, glum about the economy and cost of living, and increasingly skeptical of both AI and billionaires. That is all happening at a time when the American economic situation, while mixed, is by no means as terrible as it was in, say, 2009. Happiness and mental health seem to be lagging behind the country’s actual achievements.

So what has been happening? The forces behind wokeism no longer command so much public attention and respect when they argue about terms and pronouns. Instead, left-adjacent movements have arisen with a contrasting emphasis on action, and often action of a terrible sort. California is considering, for instance, an unworkable tax on billionaires in the state, one that even most left-leaning Democratic politicians do not support. It might nevertheless pass through via referendum…

What’s more, it is possible we are entering an era with a new culture of assassinations. There have been assassinations of Charlie Kirk, of healthcare CEO Brian Thompson, and several attempts on the life of President Trump. It can be debated how many of these killers had direct connections to the political left, but it is hard to avoid the conclusion that left-wing rhetoric about democracy destruction helped make such actions conceivable.

The social energies of the American left have moved away from the realm of speech and into plans for concrete action, whether in politics, through attempted wealth confiscations, or through organizing violence. In retrospect, wokeism, for all its problems, was a relatively harmless way of distracting activists and keeping them  Negative busy with wars over words—a less-bad allocation of social energies than what we are now seeing. So while I would not say I long for the return of high wokeism, I recognize it has been replaced by a left-adjacent movement that is worse.

Worth a ponder, do read the whole thing.  I should note I do not let the right off the hook either, though the column is mainly about what has succeeded Wokeism.  Negative emotional contagion has affected both the left and right wings today.  Here is one simple case in point.

The post “Wokeness has peaked. What followed is worse.” appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

       

Comments

• “left-adjacent movements have arisen with a contrasting ... by Gene
• In reply to Gilligan. MN doesn't have Silicon Valley or ... by WC Varones
• In reply to TMC. Re: Two legislators in Minnesota were ... by JonFraz
• Tyler, Consider a little time off. by Cove77
• In reply to Hazel Meade. Supposed to be a response to TMC. by Hazel Meade
• Plus 10 more...

Related Stories

• Repugnant Economics
• Dwarkesh in the Datacenter
• Hayek in Jacobin

 

2. Can AI replace Richard Hanania?

3. Predictions for Singapore.

4. Four ways of being seen, one of which is imaginary.

5. HOPE, preview of forthcoming Korean movie.

The post Monday assorted links appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

       

Comments

• In reply to Hazel Meade. Find Online Jobs (500$-6000$ Weekly) ... by Kara Fashingbauer
• In reply to Jet. I was kind of digging on him for a few weeks ... by Hazel Meade
• In reply to surfie. Nearly 3,000 year ago, Hesiod, the 2nd ... by Frank D
• In reply to Excursive. Desiring to be seen by our Creator is ... by Frank D
• In reply to John Doe. Thanks, JD. Is there much ethnic ... by dearieme
• Plus 10 more...

 

Over the past half-century, U.S. four-year colleges have shifted from enrolling mostly men to enrolling mostly women, while the economic position of non-college men has weakened markedly. We examine how these changes correspond with the evolving structure of marriage markets across cohorts and places. As college men have become increasingly scarce, college women have maintained stable marriage rates by marrying high-earning non-college men. This shift—combined with the broader economic decline of non-college men—has sharply reduced the pool of economically stable partners available to non-college women: the share of non-college men who earn above the national median and are not married to college women has fallen by more than 50%. Cross-area evidence shows that education gaps in marriage are smaller where non-college men face lower rates of joblessness and incarceration. Taken together, the evidence suggests that deteriorating outcomes for men have primarily undermined the marriage prospects of non-college women.

That is from a new NBER working paper by Clara Chambers, Benjamin Goldman & Joseph Winkelmann.

The post Who is losing out in marriage market competition? appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

       

Comments

• In reply to Bitch Magnet. Its socially and culturally ... by chuck
• In reply to Bill Allen. Remember the bottom 50% of men don't ... by chuck
• In reply to Math. Find Online Jobs (500$-6000$ Weekly) safe ... by Kara Fashingbauer
• In reply to superdestroyer. It is somewhat ironic then what ... by Lizard Man
• In reply to Dick King. From what I have read, there are ... by Lizard Man
• Plus 10 more...

Related Stories

• Tajikistan fact of the day
• Why I am skeptical on the relationship between smart phones and fertility
• Dwarkesh in the Datacenter

 

Thanks for swinging by Southeastern Michigan. He are two things other things that this area continues to produce and export at scale that don’t get as much notice:

* Mortgages – The two largest residential mortgage lenders are located in Detroit: United Wholesale Mortgage ($164B of mortgage originations for 2025) and Rocket Mortgages ($113B). It’s a fragmented industry, but to give you a sense of their comparative scale, Chase is #3 lender @ $66B in originations. Detroit continues to be the home of financial services for many Americans’ largest purchase.

* Food – Michigan, not NY or Italy, is responsible for the scaling of pizza. Domino’s, Little Caesar’s, and Jet’s were all founded in Southeastern Michigan. Domino’s is the largest pizza company in the world, and in many global markets, Domino’s defines “pizza.” For instance, Domino’s market share of pizza in the UK is over 50%. So, the UK has adopted Michigan’s, not Italy’s, understanding of pizza.

One narrative for Michigan should be that it has continued to shape global culture, through scaled production of mortgages and pizza. It doesn’t get more American than cars + mortgages + pizza, does it?

That is from Jeff Withington.

The post What else is special about southeastern Michigan? (from my email) appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

       

Comments

• In reply to Frank. Considering how big EDM is nowadays, I ... by Johnny Utah
• In reply to M. Don’t forget Pewabic Pottery in Detroit by Howard Husovk
• In reply to mkt42. Lake Superior weather is lethal. This was ... by Frank
• In reply to Smug Belgian. Find Online Jobs (500$-6000$ ... by Kara Fashingbauer
• In reply to Jim. Though it's at the opposite end of the state ... by mkt42
• Plus 10 more...

Related Stories

• South Korea facts of the day
• Hayek in Jacobin
• My excellent Conversation with Bob Spitz

 

That is from Alex Nowrasteh.  And for some country by country graphs:

Here is that link.  There might be some connection to smart phones, but it just does not seem that strong?  Perhaps the phones give a fillip and a modest acceleration to an already in place trend?  And are Kenya’s phones really all that “smart,” even today?

The post Why I am skeptical on the relationship between smart phones and fertility appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

       

Comments

• In reply to Heedless. Find Online Jobs (500$-6000$ Weekly) ... by Kara Fashingbauer
• The super high fertility rates in ye olden days were ... by JonFraz
• In reply to C. Fertility rates are noising from what we can ... by Sure
• In reply to Sure. @Sure You might enjoy reading a working ... by C
• In reply to Scott Sumner. The second chart ends at 2023. As ... by Ostap Karmodi
• Plus 10 more...

Related Stories

• Tajikistan fact of the day
• Who is losing out in marriage market competition?
• Dwarkesh in the Datacenter

 

2, New NSF initiative, which seems set to bypass universities?

3. Are firms migrating from the US to Europe, or vice versa?

4. Soft tissue star injuries in the NBA are getting worse.

5. NY high school has 21 valedictorians all with A+ averages.

6. How to drink more water.

7. Are smartphones behind the decline in birth rates? (FT)

8. Patrick Collison on Detroit.

The post Sunday assorted links appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

       

Comments

• In reply to Rebes. Find Online Jobs (500$-6000$ Weekly) safe ... by Kara Fashingbauer
• In reply to TMC. This is probably somewhat medication. More ... by Ben
• In reply to Sidd. Good comment overall. But though this ... by mkt42
• In reply to mikeInThe716. Dennis Leary comes to mind: “You ... by Brian Villanueva
• 2. This was 5 minutes worth of searching on the NSF's funding ... by Brian Villanueva
• Plus 10 more...

 

The post Dwarkesh in the Datacenter appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

       

Comments

• In reply to ndp_jwh. Find Online Jobs (500$-6000$ Weekly) ... by Kara Fashingbauer
• In reply to Joseph Ferguson. If harvesting operates in the ... by trump tried to coo
• I’ve long wondered if the allocation of super High-IQ workers ... by Ed
• We'll all get a go od belly laugh when a huge, consumptive ... by Patrick
• how do we live with data centers? bbc buisness daily ... by seb
• Plus 10 more...

Related Stories

• Repugnant Economics
• South Korea facts of the day
• Revealing Life Preferences Through LLMs

 

Links to the full debate:

• YouTube: https://youtu.be/AuPz09dpLSc

• Substack: https://opentodebate.substack.com/p/the-hopkins-forum-is-the-scientific
• Spotify Podcast: https://open.spotify.com/episode/2g54DD8v68vII771VdxlDC?si=d7c1c3b67de84901
• Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/open-to-debate/id216713308?i=1000767731431

Also to be broadcast over NPR.

The post “Is the scientific enterprise too risk-averse?” appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

       

Comments

• In reply to Dismalist. Find Online Jobs (500$-6000$ Weekly) ... by Kara Fashingbauer
• In reply to rayward. LLMs are good at deduction and ... by Joseph Ferguson
• Tyler have you read Charles Peirce's work on the economics of ... by Joseph Ferguson
• Funding is risk-averse. by ed o
• In reply to dearieme. After my biologist daughter explained ... by Dismalist
• Plus 6 more...

Related Stories

• “Wokeness has peaked. What followed is worse.”
• Weapons, Wealth, and the Fates of Societies
• Meta-papers in science (from my email)