Justifying a CBDC Transition

3 Replies to “Justifying a CBDC Transition”

1. Ryan,
   I really don’t know WHY it matters to me…possibly I don’t like hypocrisy, especially when I agree with many of your opinions, BUT…here’s a point of FACT: there is NO ‘Democrat’ party. The fact that you have trouble associating their REAL moniker, I.E.; The DEMOCRATIC Party, which was formed in 1828, shows that you lean to the ‘right’, while telling your viewership that you report with NO Party relationship, is false. You are Biased & it would be nice if you mentioned it, now & then. It wouldn’t stop me from listening, it would be a breeze or fresh air passing through your narrative of Jan 6 insurrection or your acknowledged adolescent view of Abortion. I say this as a Bloodbrother to the Blackfoot People. Forced miscarriage has been practiced throughout Tribal histories, not just in the genocide of the People by Whites. There is NO ‘shame’ or ‘Sin’ to the act, often just necessity, we know that Spirit enters upon the first Breath and the FIRST thing taught to our braves, our children, is the FACT; YOU ARE GOING TO DIE…let TODAY be a GOOD day to die!

   Reply

   1. Or (your assumption aside) it shows that I have come to my own independent reasoning on my I feel it is silly to call one party in a two party illusion “Democratic”, which has a clear meaning outside of their name. I find that manipulative, from inception. But assuming into your own biases is certainly one way to go. So I call it what makes sense, the Democrat party. My “adolescent” view on abortion? You mean that I am able to personally disagree with the practice yet still understand that each person can make their own decision? Yeah, clearly adolescent.

      Reply

2. I have no problem seeing the 2 party illusion for what it is and when Ryan references the “Democrats/Republicans” I believe he’s only using the term that “Democrats/Republicans” associate with themselves or what’s commonly used to refer to them. It’s VERY obvious that when we look at their actions vs words we see they’re all working together despite the illusions of division and constant disagreement. Therefore, NOT 2 parties but 1 as 2 parts. No offense to you @Dan Hoquist but I think your idea of Ryan’s “lean to the right” is only accurate if you associate conservative ideas with “The Right.” I do believe Ryan has stated many times that he has a Libertarian philosophy on things and, if I’m correct, his view on abortion is spot on with that philosophy. I’ve tuned in to TLAV since 2017 and I’ve never thought Ryan was running a narrative that supports either side of this completely corrupt system we live in. In this community, we strive to live at the crossroads of “Question Everything.” and “Come To Your Own Conclusions.” The whole idea and goal of true independent news is to speak to ALL and present information from different perspectives regardless of what spin the corporate media is force feeding us. As “new” information and evidence comes out about the Jan 6 debacle, it absolutely confirms that spin and our speculations. However, we’ve been watching for the narrative to begin playing out since before it happened (Reference TLAV w/Whitney Webb Nov/Dec 2019). If you see the 2 party illusion for what it really is, you’d see the current new spin. WHY NOW is Tucker Carlson being allowed to cover the event? Why does the new “info/evidence” all of a sudden contradict the armed insurrection/coup narrative we’ve been force fed by “both parties?” Keep in mind that, at the time of the event, FOX and the Republican Party attacked Trump right alongside the Democratic Party and CNN. OBVIOUSLY the narrative was immediately at play. Now we’re getting fed a different perspective, contradicting evidence, etc and instead of seeing the game at play we still argue about the players and their stats. The division is constantly at play. As for the abortion topic, who says what your elders and culture taught you is correct? I’m a Muslim who’s religion says otherwise but that doesn’t mean my outlook is correct for all to believe and follow; ALTHOUGH I believe it to be true. It’s the same as when Ryan says he’s Christian and does not agree with abortion YET believes it’s another’s right to make their own decisions about the topic and their own lives. You make your own decisions within the law and you answer for them as well. In no way or fashion do I speak for Ryan but that’s how I remember and interpret his view. To me, that’s about as Libertarian and agreeable as you can get. Ryan, if I have misunderstood you I apologize and ask for clarification. And @Dan Hoquist I, once again, mean no offense in my remarks. What I say is not to attack or insult but to help explain and elaborate. Be aware of what you see, hear,
   and read. Question your sources whether its TLAV, US Gov, the Pope, USA Today, local newspaper, neighbor, family, etc. People are flawed but truth stands clear from all falsehood. It’s our goal and responsibility to find that truth.

   Reply