Monday, January 31, 2022

Facebook Not Ready For 2022 Election Wave


The World is Not ready for the coming Electoral Tsunami. Neither is Facebook.

With so many Elections on the Horizon: Australia, Brazil, France, Kenya, Philippines, and the U.S., will hold Elections this year.

The Conversation now should focus on how Facebook is preparing.

This comes from an Insider of 10 years, and from 2014 through the end of 2019, One who led the company’s Work across Elections Globally.

Facebook has poured more than $13 billion into Building-Up its Safety and Security Efforts in the U.S. since the 2016 Elections, when the Platform was too Slow to recognize how its Products could be Weaponized to Spread Misinformation.

Responsible Election Plans cannot be spun up in days or weeks. It takes time, not only to Organize Internally, but also to make Meaningful and Necessary Connections, with the Communities around the World, working to Secure Elections.

Facebook must begin Serious, Concerted, Well-Funded efforts today.

For some of the Elections happening in the first half of this year, Facebook is cutting it close.

But there’s still time for Facebook to commit to a Publicly available Road Map that outlines how it Plans to Build-Up its Resources to Fight Misinformation and Hate Speech around the World:

- Algorithms that find Hate Speech and Election-Related Content.

- Labels that give People more Context, like those in the U.S. applied to Content that Questioned the Election Results.

- Efforts to get People Accurate information about Where, When, and how to Vote.

These should All be a part of the Baseline Protections deploys across the Globe.

On top of these Technical Protections, it needs People with Country-specific Language and Culture Expertise, to make Tough Decisions about Speech, or Behavior, that might Violate the Platform’s Rules.

Facebook can’t do this Work alone. Partnerships with Organizations such as: the Atlantic Council; the National Democratic Institute; the International Republican Institute, and many Others were Crucial, and need to be continued.

Providing the Technical Infrastructure to Combat Misinformation is only Half the Battle. Facebook faced Scrutiny again in 2020 and 2021, for how it handled everything from Trump’s Facebook Account to False Election Fraud Claims, and Jan. 6.

This created many of the Conversations, around Balancing the Right to Free Speech, with the Harm that Speech could cause Someone.

This is One of the Central Dilemmas companies like Facebook grapple with.

What is the Right Call for company Administrators when a Sitting President of the U.S. Violates their Platform’s Community Standards, even as they believe that People should be able to Hear what he has to say?

hen are pPeople exercising their Right to Organize and Protest against their Government, as Opposed to preparing for a Violent Insurrection?

Similar Issues come up in other Countries.

Last year the Russian Government, pressured Apple and Google, to Remove an App created by Allies of Aleksei Navalny, an Opponent of President Vladimir Putin’s. Refusing the Government would have put their Employees in Russia at Risk. Complying would go against Free-Expression Standards. The Companies chose to Protect their Employees.

These are the kinds of difficult Questions that crop up in every Country, but Facebook also needs Country-specific Monitoring. Human Expertise is the only way to truly understand how Heated Discussions are shifting in real time, and to be Sensitive to Linguistic and Cultural Nuances. The word “dill” in Russian Translates to “ukrop,” for example, which has been used as a Slur against Ukrainians. Some Ukrainians, however, Reclaimed the Word and even named a Political Party after it. A Global Framework that Fails to account for these kinds of Situations, or that is Overly Reliant on Technology to address them is Not prepared to Confront the Reality of our Complex World.

Facebook has invested billions in this kind of Work. But a Majority of its Investment for Classifying Misinformation, for example, has focused on the U.S., even though Daily Active Users in other Countries make up the vast Majority of the User base. And it’s Not clear which efforts Facebook will extend from U.S. Elections to those in other Countries. It’s unlikely that within the next Two years, much less the next few months, Facebook can Build-Up Protections in every Country. But it must start Planning now for how it will exponentially scale up People, Products, and Partnerships to handle so many Elections at once in 2022 and 2024.

It should be Transparent about how it will determine what to Build in each Country. In 2019, Facebook had more than 500 Full-Time Employees and 30,000 People working on Safety and Security overall. Even with that amount of Human talent, it could cover the National Elections in only Three Major Countries at once. At least that many People were needed for the U.S. in 2020. In Two years, People in: Britain, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Taiwan, Ukraine, and the U.S., are to go to the Polls in National Elections. Facebook will need to consider Hiring at least 1,000 more Full-Time Employees to be ready for the next big Election Cycle. If the company is Cutting it close for 2022, it has just enough time to be really ready for 2024.

These Problems are Not ones that Facebook can Fix on its own. Its Parent, Meta, is a Private Company, but One with tremendous Influence on Society and Democratic discourse. Facebook needs to continue to Recognize the Responsibility it has to Protect Elections around the World, and Invest accordingly. Governments, Civil Society, and the Public, should hold it Accountable for doing so.










NYC Wins When Everyone Can Vote! Michael H. Drucker


No comments: