 Comments for The Way Forward “Evolutionary science ……. starts from a null hypothesis scenario, that is, nothing is assumed to be true and the conclusion that is drawn is guided by the results.”
I can not disagree with this more. Evolution itself is disproved simply by using the scientific method. If i was an evolutionist I would have to ask the question why does evolution not happen today. It is a fact that no one has ever seen it take place. If it were a real process then it should be still occurring and we should be able to observe many transitional forms. We are able to see microevolution take place which is nothing more than natural selection. Example : small beaked birds will die off in an area that it’s food source requires a bigger beak. Next generation there are fewer birds with small beaks etc etc until all birds of that species no longer have smaller beaks in that area. Same species in another area that has small food will have a mixture of small and large beaks. Macroevolution or “vertical” evolution as some call it where one kind evolves into another kind simply is not happening today. Many evolutionists have tried many methods to try and prove that it is but have failed to do so. Evolutionist Jeffrey Schwartz professor of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh acknowledged that “It was and still is the case that the formation of a new species by any mechanism has never been observed”. The scientific method requires us to observe and replicate. The fact that macroevolution has not and cannot be observed should be enough to dismiss it as true science. This has not been the case. Instead evolutionists assume that the information they need to validate macroevolution is still out there somewhere waiting to be found. They are going off an assumption that they desperately want to be true and support that belief with what others so clearly see as ridiculous arguments.
Content mobilized by FeedBlitz RSS Services, the premium FeedBurner alternative. | 
