Somnigroup’s $2.5B acquisition of Leggett clears U.S. antitrust review

Sheila Long O’Mara //Executive Editor, Furniture Today//June 4, 2026

DALLAS – Somnigroup International‘s proposed $2.5 billion acquisition of Leggett & Platt has cleared a regulatory milestone as the required federal antitrust waiting period expiring without a challenge.

Somnigroup disclosed in an SEC filing today that the 30-day waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act expired June 3. The expiration means U.S. antitrust regulators did not move to block the deal, a step forward in the acquisition process.

Leggett & Platt filed a similar disclosure with the SEC today confirming the same HSR expiration.

Somnigroup, the Dallas-based parent of Houston-based Mattress Firm and Tempur Sealy, announced the acquisition agreement with Leggett & Platt in April. Under the terms of the deal, Leggett & Platt would become a wholly owned subsidiary of Somnigroup.

The companies expect the transaction to close by year-end 2026, though several conditions remain. Leggett & Platt shareholders must still vote to approve the deal. Regulatory clearances are still pending in Canada, the European Union, the United Kingdom, South Korea and Austria.

The proposed combination would bring together Somnigroup’s manufacturing and retail business with Leggett & Platt’s extensive manufacturing and components operations, which supply the bedding and home furnishings industries with innersprings, foam, adjustable bed bases and other hardware.

https://www.furnituretoday.com/bedding-manufacturers/somnigroups-2-5b-acquisition-of-leggett-clears-u-s-antitrust-review/?cm_mmc=Act-On%20Software–email–Somnigroup%5Cu2019s%20%242.5B%20acquisition%20of%20Leggett%20clears%20U.S.%20antitrust%20review-_-Somnigroup%5Cu2019s%20%242.5B%20acquisition%20of%20Leggett%20clears%20U.S.%20antitrust%20review&ActOnUniqueID=HFD638689

Source

      

June 2, 2026 3 min read

BASF, Covestro, and Huntsman each issued price increase letters in the final week of May 2026, citing supply constraints and cost escalation. Increases range from $0.22 to $0.35/lb and take effect immediately or as contracts allow.

Spot trading for polymeric MDI (PMDI) and monomeric MDI (MMDI) in the US remained at elevated levels through the fourth week of May 2026, with supply tightness driving upward price renegotiations heading into June. Three major North American MDI producers issued formal price increase notices within eight days of each other.

PRICE INCREASES — LATE MAY 2026

COVESTRO

Covestro declared force majeure on all North American MDI products on 19 May, citing unforeseen production issues. The disruption is linked to CO/chlorine feed problems at an Air Products CO unit. Resolution is uncertain; ICIS projects an end in June, while market participants have flagged July as more likely. The company’s price increase of $0.22/lb is effective 1 July or as contracts allow.

HUNTSMAN

Huntsman raised MDI prices by $0.24/lb across North and South America effective immediately, and extended order lead times to three weeks from confirmation. The Geismar, Louisiana facility is running two of three production trains during a scheduled maintenance window expected to last three to four weeks. Huntsman stated that pricing will be reviewed monthly going forward.

BASF

BASF issued a $0.35/lb increase on all Lupranate® MDI products effective immediately, noting this is in addition to any previously announced adjustments. BASF is planning a 45-day MDI production turnaround in July, which market participants have associated with pre-commissioning work for a planned 200,000-tonne/year capacity addition in the US, targeted for Q3 2026. Further price adjustments were not ruled out.

MARKET CONTEXT

Some suppliers have moved away from formal monthly price letters toward shorter renegotiation cycles, with adjustments occurring as frequently as every two weeks. Pre-buying of drummed PMDI, particularly in the spray foam segment, has complicated demand assessments. Polyols remain in limited supply, constraining finished B-side system availability. Upward price pressure is expected to persist through June given the concurrent nature of planned and unplanned outages across the producer base.

Pricing communication practices have shifted notably across the North American MDI supply chain. Several suppliers have moved away from formal monthly price letters, opting instead for shorter, informal renegotiation cycles — in some cases as frequently as every two weeks. This reflects the pace at which upstream cost conditions are moving and signals that contract pricing mechanisms are struggling to keep up with spot market realities. On the demand side, assessing true end-use consumption has become difficult. Active pre-buying of drummed PMDI — concentrated in the spray foam insulation segment — has pulled forward volume that would ordinarily appear in June and July order books, inflating near-term apparent demand while masking the underlying consumption rate. As building construction activity picks up seasonally, the gap between stocked inventory and actual requirements will become clearer, though by that point spot availability may have tightened further. Finished B-side system availability remains constrained. Polyols, which are in limited regional supply, are the primary bottleneck; systems houses and spray foam contractors are reporting difficulty securing complete formulated systems, not just isocyanate. This dynamic is compounding procurement challenges for downstream buyers who cannot substitute MDI independently of the polyol component.

Looking ahead, upward price pressure is expected to carry through June and into Q3. The concurrent nature of planned turnarounds — Huntsman’s Geismar maintenance, BASF’s 45-day July outage — and the unresolved Covestro force majeure leave little margin for supply recovery before peak seasonal demand arrives. Buyers operating without contract volume protections are most exposed.

https://www.pudaily.com/news/64935/supply-squeeze-deepens-as-basf-covestro-and-huntsman-issue-price-increases-in-no

Source

      

by Tyler Durden

Sunday, May 31, 2026 – 05:40 PM

Less than a month after we mused at Berkshire’s most recent cash hoard which as of March 31 stood just shy of $400 billion, and wondered who Warren Buffett’s replacement Greg Abel will acquire first…

… we got the answer on Sunday afternoon, when Berkshire announced it will acquire homebuilder Taylor Morrison Home Corp. in an all-cash deal worth about $6.8 billion. Which means that after the deal, Berkshire still has $390 billion in T-bills collecting about 3.5%. 

The offer of $72.50 per common share represents a 24% premium to the home builder’s latest closing price on Friday. The deal is expected to close in the second half of this year.

Taylor Morrison is one of the largest community developers and homebuilders in the US and also offers financial services like home loans, titles, escrow and insurance to consumers, according to the statement. The firm has more than 350 communities across 12 states. The existing Taylor Morrison management team, including Chief Executive Officer Sheryl Palmer, will continue to lead the firm, according to the statement.

“We are excited to welcome Taylor Morrison into Berkshire’s portfolio,” Greg Abel, chief executive officer of Berkshire Hathaway, said in a statement Sunday. “Over time, we expect to unify our site-built homebuilding operations into a combined platform enabling us to deliver the dream of homeownership to more Americans.”

This is the first multibillion-dollar acquisition under Abel, who took over Berkshire Hathaway earlier this year after Warren Buffett retired last year.  While investors have been satisfied with Abel’s command over the sprawling conglomerate, some have been hoping that a deal could support Berkshire’s shares, which fell 5.6% so far this year, largely due to Berkshire’s lack of exposure to the AI bubble. The S&P 500 index gained 10.7% in the same period.

It is unclear if the deal signals that Abel believes the bottom for the US housing market is coming, or if Berkshire is buying a homebuilder during a brutal housing labor shortage, giving companies like Taylor Morrison operating leverage despite sky high mortgage rates. In any case, while millions of Americans have been hoping and praying that 8% mortgage will crash the housing market – which has never been more unaffordable – and allow them to enter at lower price, the investor with the biggest cash pile in history just bought a builder outright with cash from under the rug, as a three million home supply deficit clearly overrides the soaring cost of capital. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/berkshire-buys-taylor-morrison-68-billion-first-big-deal-under-greg-abel

Source

      

Mattress Recycling Council Wins Dr. Herman T. Stone Technical Excellence Award; Friedman
Inducted Into Hall of Fame; Skorpenske Recognized With Lifetime Achievement Award

PITTSBURGH (June 1, 2026)—Members and guests of The Polyurethane Foam Association had
plenty to discuss at the group’s annual Spring meeting, as the flexible foam industry faces supply
chain challenges, new potential regulation, and the promise of new technologies.

More than 170 industry professionals (a modern-era record attendance), including C-suite
executives, researchers, EHS specialists, marketers, and technologists came to the Omni William
Penn in late May for networking and presentations on foam sustainability, market trends, and the
regulatory environment.

“PFA was created 46 years ago to help
the industry address challenges that
threatened the existence of the flexible
polyurethane foam industry,” said Cam
McLaughlin of Elite Comfort Solutions
and current PFA President. “Today, we
still confront serious and changing
threats. This Association provides its
members with a platform to educate
themselves and take sensible action.”

During the conference’s Industry Issues Session, speakers covered current supply chain issues
created by the Strait of Hormuz blockade and chemical plant shutdowns. Representatives from foam
end-user industries, including automotive, business furniture, and bedding discussed conditions in
those market segments. Other speakers provided updates on isocyanate regulations and research,
plus reports on sustainability advances.

The Thursday afternoon Technical Program included presentations on AI-enabled R&D, foam
laydown technologies, mattress recycling byproducts, and bringing scientific rigor to mattress
comfort.

Michael Gallagher (second from left) and Karl Heider (second from
right) of the Mattress Recycling Council were winners of the Dr.
Herman Stone Technical Excellence Award at PFA’s conference in
Pittsburgh. Also pictured are Russ Batson, Executive Director of PFA
(left), and Cam McLaughlin of Elite Comfort Solutions, current PFA
President (right).

Following PFA’s Technical Program, Michael Gallagher and Karl Heider of the Mattress Recycling
Council were named winners of the Dr. Herman Stone Technical Excellence Award. The award is
voted on by attendees present for the Technical Program. The award is named for Dr. Herman T.
Stone, who served as PFA’s first Technical Director. In 2007, Dr. Stone was inducted into the
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Hall of Fame. It was the second time Gallagher was honored with the
award.

Industry Veterans Honored With Hall of Fame, Lifetime Achievement Award
Other foam professionals were also recognized for their contributions to
the industry. Sol Friedman of Future Foam, Inc. was inducted into the
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Hall of Fame. Friedman was one of the
founding executives of Future Foam during the late 1950s, and was
instrumental in helping flexible polyurethane foam get accepted by
customers to replace existing cushioning materials. He also helped
oversee Future Foam’s growth into one of the nation’s largest foam
producers.

Friedman died in late April. His son, Steve, spoke on his behalf in
Pittsburgh, recalling how his father had been a minor league baseball
player (once pitching against the legendary Bob Gibson) before finishing
college and entering the foam industry.

In addition, Richard Skorpenske, recently retired from Covestro, was
recognized with PFA’s Lifetime Achievement Award. Skorpenske has a
four-decade long career in the foam industry as a researcher and
specialist in sustainability. He is a contributor to a still-used textbook on
flexible foam, developed numerous patented technologies, and has long contributed time to
committees within PFA, the Center for the Polyurethanes Industry of the American Chemistry
Council, the International Sleep Products Association, and Cribs for
Kids, an organization that provides infant beds to underserved families.
“A key purpose of the Hall of Fame is to archive the stories of industry
founders, so that future generations can understand and learn from
them,” said McLaughlin. “Sol Friedman was a true pioneer.”

“And Richard Skorpenske’s insights and guidance for flexible
polyurethane foam has been invaluable for years, and will still be shaping
our business for decades to come.”

The Polyurethane Foam Association is a trade association founded in 1980 to
help educate regulators, users, allied industries, and others about flexible
polyurethane foam. PFA provides facts on environmental, health and safety
issues and technical information on the performance of flexible polyurethane
foam (FPF) in consumer and industrial products. FPF is used as a key
comfort component in most upholstered furniture and mattress products, along with automotive seating,

carpet cushion, packaging, and numerous other applications.

To learn more, visit www.pfa.org.

Source

      

Chemical Grade Propylene is $0.52/lb in May 2026. Down 7cpp from April.

Source

      

The first settlement in the long-standing In re Diisocyanates Antitrust Litigation was reached today with the BASF Defendants. The case, filed in 2018, alleges a conspiracy between BASF, Covestro, Huntsman, Dow and Wanhua to fix the prices of diisocyanates, colloquially known as MDI and TDI, in the United States since at least 2016. Diisocyantes are ubiquitous chemicals used in the manufacture of urethanes and foam products ranging from cast wheels, to foam mattresses, to coatings, adhesive and sealants. The details of the settlement will be made public upon the filing of the preliminary approval motion next month. Plaintiffs expect this ice-breaker settlement to lead to further settlements with the remaining Defendants.

April 2nd, 2026

hartleyllp.com/ice-breaker-settlement-reached-in-diisocyanates-case/

Source

      

Northbrook, IL, May 15, 2026 – Effective July 1, 2026, or as contracts allow, Stepan will increase the price for
STEPANPOL ® and TERATE ® Rigid Polyester Polyols used in the Americas by $0.185 per pound.

This increase is addition
to the price announcement effective May 15 th , 2026. This increase is necessary due to the continued escalation in raw
material prices, freight and energy costs.

www.stepan.com

Source

      

May 07, 2026, 5:11 PM ETSomnigroup International Inc. (SGI) Stock

Q1: 2026-05-07 Earnings Summary

EPS of $0.59 beats by $0.02

 | Revenue of $1.80B (12.26% Y/Y) misses by $29.65M

Somnigroup International Inc. (SGI) Q1 2026 Earnings Call May 7, 2026 8:00 AM EDT

Company Participants

Lauren Avritt – Director of Investor Relations
Scott Thompson – Chairman of the Board, CEO & President
Bhaskar Rao – Executive VP & CFO

Scott Thompson
Chairman of the Board, CEO & President

Good morning. Thank you for joining us on our first quarter 2026 Earnings Call. I’ll begin with some highlights from the quarter and then turn the call over to Bhaskar to review our financial performance in more detail and discuss our reaffirmed 2026 earnings guidance. After that, we’ll open up the call for Q&A.

In the first quarter of 2026, net sales increased a healthy 12% to $1.8 billion. Adjusted EBITDA increased 20% to $297 million, and adjusted EPS increased a robust 20% to $0.59 per share. We are pleased with these results, particularly against the backdrop of heightened geopolitical tensions and winter weather disruptions in the U.S., all of which weighed on the industry demand.

We believe global bedding demand declined mid-single digits in the first quarter, which was below our expectation that demand would be flat to slightly positive during the quarter. We believe our performance reflected the strength of our business model and its ability to perform across varying market conditions. This has allowed us to continue to extend our leadership position in the industry.

Turning to our first highlight. We expanded EBITDA margin by over 100 basis points and grew adjusted EPS by 20%. We accomplished this on 12% sales growth, demonstrating the operating leverage embedded in our business model. We also delivered record first quarter operating cash flow, which we deployed towards debt reduction. We ended the first quarter at 3.1x leverage, and are on track to return to our targeted range of 2 to 3x adjusted EBITDA in the next few months.

Our second highlight. Our North American Tempur Sealy business outperformed the broader market. Tempur Sealy North America delivered mid-single-digit wholesale sales growth year-over-year on a like-for-like basis, driven by investments in high-quality advertising, continued momentum in Sealy Posturepedic line and increased balance of share at Mattress Firm. Looking to the back half of the year, we expect the launch of our new Stearns & Foster lineup to optimize price architecture within the broader portfolio, support higher average selling price for our retail partners, strengthen our position at higher pricing points.

We expanded our offering with additional SKUs at the top of the price range, targeting the customer who has demonstrated continued resilience through this cycle, and represents a significant growth opportunity. We’ll support the launch with new national campaign advertising focused on differentiated luxury product and on broader health and wellness benefits with sleep.

Our third highlight, our international business continued to capitalize on long-term growth opportunities, delivered double-digit growth on a reported basis and mid-single-digit growth on a constant currency basis. Tempur International outperformed the broader industry in the quarter, extending a multiyear track record of solid growth across our key markets. This performance reflects continued disciplined investment in distribution and marketing, a resilient supply chain, strong local execution and the strength of our Tempur brand. We’re pleased with our results in a challenging environment, and our international business remains well positioned for continued growth over the long term.

Our U.K.-based bedding retailer, Dreams, once again outperformed the market this quarter, reinforcing its position as a category leader. Strong brand awareness and share of voice, combined with effective execution drove solid customer engagement and healthy order volume. Our ongoing operational discipline and a continued focus on product quality and customer experience supports further growth in this very competitive U.K. market.

Our fourth highlight, Mattress Firm outperformed the broader U.S. market, supported by its scale, depth of category expertise, and a well-curated merchandising assortment. Merchandising actions taken over the past year have better positioned Mattress Firm business to meet customer needs across price points while maintaining a strong focus on quality and innovation. During the quarter, we further deepened relationships with suppliers aligned with our quality standards and marketing commitment.

Our proprietary sleep expert model continues to differentiate the in-store experience, supported by one of the industry’s largest and most highly trained sales force, which has been augmented by ongoing technology investments. We remain on track with our previously announced $150 million store refresh program targeting completion in 2027. To date, we have spent approximately $40 million on the store refresh program, all funded operating cash flow. Additionally, the rollout of Tempur brand walls is progressing well with national completion expected by year-end.

Scott Thompson
Chairman of the Board, CEO & President

Thank you, Bhaskar. Well done. Before opening the call up for Q&A, I want to quickly address our recent announced agreement to combine Leggett & Platt. As we announced last month, we signed a definitive agreement to combine with Leggett, an all-stock transaction valued at approximately $2.5 billion, including the assumption of debt. We expect this transaction to close by year-end, subject to satisfactory customary closing conditions.

Following the close of the transaction, Leggett is expected to operate as a separate business unit within Somnigroup, similar to Tempur Sealy, Mattress Firm and Dreams. And to maintain its offices, including its primary location in Carthage, Missouri. We’re proud to have Leggett & Platt join us and believe the combination is beneficial to all stakeholders of both companies. We expect the combination to leverage the individual strengths of Somnigroup and Leggett & Platt to realize 5 strategic benefits.

First, this combination continues our vertical integration strategy and enables us to closer collaborate between component engineering, manufacturing design, and customer trends, supporting accelerated innovation cycle and more cost-effective consumer-centric product construction. Second, this combination provides access to incremental addressable markets beyond bedding, expanding Somnigroup’s long-term growth opportunities and cash flow generation. Third, the combination is expected to lower Somnigroup’s net financial leverage and increase its flexibility. Fourth, the combination is expected to be accretive to adjusted earnings per share before synergies and in the first year post closing, and significantly increased SGI’s peak earnings in a normalized bedding market. And fifth, the combination presents cost synergy opportunities. In total, we expect synergies to result in at least $50 million of EBITDA on a fully implemented annual run rate basis.

Susan Maklari
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Research Division

I want to focus on demand, Scott, especially with the comments around pricing and consumer confidence. Can you talk about price elasticity across the business and how you’re thinking of your ability to continue to drive industry relative outperformance despite all the headwinds that we are seeing on the consumer?

Scott Thompson
Chairman of the Board, CEO & President

Sure. And thank you for your question, Susan. I think when you look at elasticity, I guess the best thing to look at is really the closing rate. And if we look at closing rate, either whether it be in our own Tempur stores or you look at Mattress Firm, it continues to improve. So what that tells me is, when customers show up at the store, they’re looking for products. They then get full discovery of price, and we’re — the closing rates going up. So it doesn’t appear the elasticity is very high. I think that’s probably the best evidence in looking at that particular issue.

As far as outperforming the industry, as we’ve talked about numerous times, over the years, we continue to improve our competitiveness in the marketplace. And where I look, whether it be in our recent price increase, which I think will be among the lowest by any of the manufacturers, and that has to do with the way we handle the inflation is certainly a competitive advantage.

When I look at our advertising share of voice in the marketplace, this would be around the world. It continues to be, call it, top of class. What information I get informally on other manufacturers, they would appear to be not dealing with the current market conditions as well and maybe being a little challenged from a capital standpoint. So certainly, our cash flows and balance sheet are a competitive advantage. So I think we’ll continue to outperform the industry, and I think the industry will normalize once you get through some of the geopolitical issues that we all know about.

Robert Griffin
Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division

Scott, I wanted to first — I want to ask on the Stearns & Foster launch in 2H. We’ve been around the business a lot. We’ve seen a few different launches from Stearns, some starts and go kind of in the product. But the structure of SGI is much different today with all the advantages you’ve highlighted. So can you maybe unpack how that launch is set up to play out and how this launch might be a little different and where that opportunity is for that product?

Scott Thompson
Chairman of the Board, CEO & President

Sure. Great question, Bobby. First of all, we talked about Stearns, you have to realize that we have cannibalized some of Stearns as we moved Sealy Posturepedic up from a price standpoint. So we self did that. And so this is the last piece of getting our pricing architecture right between all 3 brands. Tempur, Sealy and Stearns. And so that opens up some more addressable market, and we also moved the price bracket up at Stearns & Foster. Primarily, you might find interesting, we’re being pushed by our retailers who wanted a higher-price Stearns & Foster. So that is new. We also leaned into hybrids in that area, and hybrids have been good in the bedding market in the U.S., as I know you know. And quite frankly, the last Stearns & Foster hybrid, we didn’t hit the mark perfectly. So that’s a major upgrade.

I think the other thing I would point to is with Mattress Firm as part of the family, we have very strong support from Mattress Firm, from an advertising, slot commitment, training and probably a higher degree of support than we would have had without having them in the family. I think those factors probably combined with some national advertising gives us more momentum on this launch than we’ve probably had in any launch in Stearns & Foster’s history.

Scott Thompson
Chairman of the Board, CEO & President

So I think the other thing I’d point out when you talk about the inflation is when you look at the price increase that we took, it’s probably overall about a 4% increase, and a 4% increase in this business is not disruptive to customers. Because quite frankly, customers don’t shop for the product but once every 8 years. So it’s not nearly as sensitive as something like gas prices.

Bradley Thomas
KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., Research Division

I wanted to ask, Scott, about the performance at the non-Mattress Firm third-party channels that you sell into in North America. I believe you said that, that was down 4% in the quarter. So it looks like maybe in line to slightly better than how the market performed. But can you just give us a sense of what you’re hearing from those partners? And any specific strategies, or goals as you think about partner growth, door growth, slot growth, et cetera?

Scott Thompson
Chairman of the Board, CEO & President

Sure. We call those the other, other. And to be clear, that would be U.S. retailers, non-Mattress firm, doesn’t include Canada and Mexico. That number was up 4%, I guess? Yes, up 4% — excuse me, down 4%. And so I think you said it right, with a market that was probably down 5% plus a little is probably a slight outperformance in the other, other category.

I think those retailers are focused — what they’ve always been focused on the success of their business, which is giving them a popular product, help drive customers into their showroom, deliver on time and all those things. I think they’re excited to see Stearns & Foster come. I think they know there’s some upside there. The Sealy Posturepedic line continues to do very well. Constant frustration with the other, other retailers just on traffic, and I think that’s universal. And they certainly appreciate the strength of our advertising.

As far as additional slots, we will get some incremental slots in the new Stearns launch, but they aren’t going to be material to the total revenues of North America. But those would be — we’ll get some incremental slots there. Haven’t seen any deterioration in our positions at any of the other, other retailers. And I think on the go forward, it’s really about velocity. And that goes to having a great sales force, with quality and quantity of our advertising. And quite frankly, what our competitors do and how they perform.

Peter Keith
Piper Sandler & Co., Research Division

I wanted to circle back on the chemical shortage. We’ve been getting a lot of questions on it. So it was only a $10 million impact for Q2, which I think is a positive. But could you address two things. Number one, how much inventory of chemicals in terms of months of supply, are you keeping on hand now? And then secondarily, with this polyol shortage, could that play out into the back half of the year, perhaps with some shipment delays or product outages. I know in the past, you lean more towards high-end product like back in 2021. So if you could just address the kind of the puts and takes around this polyol shortage. I’d appreciate it.

Scott Thompson
Chairman of the Board, CEO & President

Yes. I’m going to take a crack at it. I think when it first showed its ugly head, there was a worst-case scenario that was worked through and mitigated and the word shortage was probably an appropriate possibility. I think with what we know today, I don’t think the industry is going to have shortages as far as outages from a supply standpoint. There is pricing impact, okay? And that’s been rolled through the industry. But I’m not nearly as concerned about shortages, and I’m not hearing comments about shortages. And that’s an industry comment.

When you then go to Tempur Sealy specifically, obviously, we have an advantaged situation because of our volumes. And then obviously, we have a large amount of safety stock safety stock is in place for one, these kind of events, which you’ve referenced, but also possible hurricane issues and stuff, what do you want to say? 3, 4 months?

Bhaskar Rao
Executive VP & CFO

That’s fair, yes.

Scott Thompson
Chairman of the Board, CEO & President

Yes. It varies a little bit, but for talking terms, I think, 3 or 4 months. Also you can bend in your volumes to products that don’t use as much foam at times. But I think from where it was, what would that happened about 1.5 months ago?

Bhaskar Rao
Executive VP & CFO

A couple of months ago.

Scott Thompson
Chairman of the Board, CEO & President

A couple of months ago. That situation continues to get better and better. in my outlook on that right now is that it’s a pricing event, and the pricing event has generally run through the industry.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4900302-somnigroup-international-inc-sgi-q1-2026-earnings-call-transcript?mailingid=45616402&messageid=2800&position=rta_analysis_fullsummary_main_3_textlink&serial=45616402.26&source=email_2800

Source

      

©aulia sailan ilma / adobe stock

industry insider | May 7, 2026 |

What a foam shortage means for furniture prices

By Aidan Taylor

In mid-March, a fire broke out at LyondellBasell’s Bayport Choate chemical plant in Pasadena, Texas. The site produces propylene oxide (PO), a key ingredient in a virtually indispensable material for the design industry: polyurethane foam. It stuffs seat cushions, sectionals and sofas—and serves as the protective packaging those items are shipped in.

The Texas plant—the largest PO facility in the world, with an annual capacity of up to 600,000 tons—announced that part of the complex would be shut down for repairs, greatly reducing the factory’s output. Suddenly, the availability of a raw material furniture manufacturers rely on to fulfill their orders is in question. Naturally, they are feeling the effects.

“We have different vendors for cushion products, but typically they’ll buy foam from only a handful of people who produce the foam itself,” explains Corey Teague, president of North Carolina–based furniture brand Huntington House. “So when those handful of manufacturers run into chemical shortages, they increase the pricing, and then it starts making its way through the system.”

After the fire, suppliers quickly informed their partners that foam prices would be increasing 10 to 20 percent across the board. The good news for manufacturers—and their customers—is that foam typically comprises a relatively small portion of an item’s cost. “Foam makes up probably 5 to 8 percent of your total cost of a piece of furniture, so if [the price] goes up 20 percent, it’s really only impacting your bottom line by a percentage point or two,” says Trent Wright, head of manufacturing at Coley Home. “Even [if] it goes up a lot, the overall impact of your cost should not cripple you.”

Still, the fire comes amid a slew of other challenges that have chipped away at manufacturers’ margins—spiking oil costs, the result of the conflict in Iran, have only added fuel to the fire. That coupled with the shortages and increased costs of foam have further cemented preexisting plans for increases. “The foam made the increase that we’re about to take inevitable, because it really pushed us over the ability to eat it,” says Tim Newlin, president and CEO of Ohio-based Norwalk Furniture, which recently announced a 3 percent price increase that will go into effect in June. But the key driver, he says, is gas prices rather than foam: “Everything that ships to you from a supplier is going up because of inbound freight.”

On May 13, Jessica Nelson, co-founder of AI for Interiors and principal of Etch Design Group, breaks down how AI shows up in a real design studio and shares how to start using it with confidence. Click here to learn more and remember, workshops are free for BOH Insiders.

Meanwhile, war-induced pressure on European supply chains and price increases tied to the shortage of another important chemical—toluene diisocyanate, or TDI—is compounding the tension as demand for American sources surges. “At the moment, we remain hopeful that we and other financially strong foam buyers will not experience supply shortages, though much depends on the speed at which the damaged facility can be brought back online,” says Alex Shuford, CEO of North Carolina–based Rock House Farm, the parent company of Century Furniture, Hancock & Moore, Hickory Chair, and Highland House.

For some manufacturers, the problem isn’t the rising cost of foam, but simply getting it in the first place. Bigger players are able to point to the volume of their business, pressuring suppliers to keep their orders coming as usual. For smaller manufacturers, the possibility of a foam allocation—where only a percentage of a manufacturer’s order is delivered due to shortages—has been top of mind. “Some suppliers are putting customers on allocation. [If] they receive 50 percent of the foam that they received before, then our vendor has to decide, ‘Who gets that foam?’” says Wright. “It becomes: Are you the best customer? Fortunately for us, we have a very good personal and business relationship with our supplier, and even though we’re receiving a price increase, we’re not too worried about allocation. But I do think the allocation part is going to hit the industry as a whole, which will certainly drive lead times longer and hurt the bottom line, because you’re not able to ship the dollars that you would normally.”

To circumvent the potential for future allocation, many suppliers rushed to purchase foam in bulk immediately after the fire in an effort to ensure they had enough to fulfill orders in the near future. “We work with some of the bigger cushion manufacturers, and they all started buying as many buns of foam as they could,” says Nathan Copeland, president at Highland House. “The idea was that, one, it’s at a lower price point. And then two, they were trying to keep us from being put on allocation.”

That foresight was imparted by past experiences. In February of 2021, an ice storm blew through Texas and damaged several chemical factories. The shutdowns, which were exacerbated by power outages, sent shortages rippling throughout the industry—at a time when pandemic-fueled orders were sending business for furniture brands through the roof. “We were put on rations of foam,” recalls Copeland. “At the time, business had ramped up so much that we needed to be at 120 percent of our normal allocation, because we needed [foam] to be able to fill every order. Those allocations really did hurt everyone in our business. They were hoping it would last for maybe eight to 10 weeks, and it ended up being closer to 20 weeks.”

Even with its challenges, the current situation is faring far better than the 2021 crisis. “We had originally anticipated October [2026 High Point] Market as a time frame for when things would kind of return to normal,” says Teague. “And then that got updated to August. The last we heard is that it’s more like June or July now, so the story has gotten increasingly better. We’re optimistic that it’s going to get resolved sooner than we thought.”

https://businessofhome.com/articles/what-a-foam-shortage-means-for-furniture-prices

Source

      

May 01, 2026, 5:31 PM ETHuntsman Corporation (HUN) Stock

Q1: 2026-04-30 Earnings Summary

EPS of -$0.20 beats by $0.01

 | Revenue of $1.42B (0.71% Y/Y) beats by $30.13M

Huntsman Corporation (HUN) Q1 2026 Earnings Call May 1, 2026 10:00 AM EDT

Company Participants

Ivan Marcuse – Vice President of Investor Relations & Corporate Development
Peter Huntsman – Chairman, President & CEO
Philip Lister – Executive VP & CFO

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

Ivan, thank you very much. Thank you all for taking the time to join us this morning. Before I begin my remarks about our company and recent events, I want to simply say that I hope there is a quick and peaceful resolution to the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. Over the past 40 years, I’ve had the opportunity to visit every country bordering the Persian Gulf with the exception of Iraq. I have always been treated warmly and fairly by the people I’ve encountered. I hope that my comments do not come across as being callous in any way to the suffering and fear emanating from this region as I address the economic impact of these events to our bottom line and industry.

From the first hours of this conflict, our #1 commercial priority has been to increase prices enough to offset rising costs. I believe we’ve been successful in doing this. This will require continued communications with our customers and suppliers and also the discipline to make sure that we are not a shock absorber between raw material costs and finished product pricing. Our next priority is operating our plants in a reliable manner to make sure that we have the product to meet our demand. Our operations during the first quarter and going into the second quarter have been excellent.

From a sales perspective, we are seeing stronger-than-expected demand going well into the second quarter. I would say that this is being brought about by 3 factors: number one, seasonality as we move into the second quarter and the building season resumes across North America, Europe and Asia. Number two, customers who are buying ahead of the expected price increases that are being announced; and number three, disruptions that have been seen in certain trade flows that have impacted supply. An example of this would be some of our maleic customers in Europe who have become overly dependent on Chinese supply of maleic have seen a disruption in supply as raw materials and shipping costs have increased from that region. These 3 factors are also happening at a time when most inventory levels are very low across many supply chains.

These improved order patterns are being seen as we enter into the second quarter in most of our regions and across many of our products. The obvious countervailing point to all of this is how long does it continue? I can’t see order patterns that go through the month of June, but the guidance that we have shared from each division in Q2 reflects what we’ve seen to date. Today, that visibility is less clear as we look further into the quarter. I struggle to see how inflationary pressures, particularly in areas reliant on imported energy like much of Asia and Europe, will not see an inevitable downward pressure later in the year as consumer spending gradually shifts towards higher prices. To what degree this occurs is yet to be seen.

I am heartened to see the housing starts and durable goods orders in the United States better than expected for the month of March. But I’m also keeping an eye on residential permits, a step that precedes construction starts down 11% for the month of March. There will also be some longer-term dislocation of traditional economics. If you were a producer that enjoyed discounted raw materials coming out of Venezuela, Iran and Russia a few months ago, it is likely that you’re not seeing such discounts today, and I highly doubt you’ll see them in the foreseeable future. Many customers are looking for closer and more secure sources of supply. Supply chains are shifting and being reassessed. I believe that there will be some lasting impact for certain regions and products that may not seem too apparent today. It is simply too early to know how lasting some of these will be.

In short, we are aggressively raising our prices to both cover our cost of our raw materials while also expanding margins from the trough economics that we’ve been experiencing for the past 3 years. We will continue to manage our costs and deliver these objectives on budget. We will be focused on volumes and make sure that spot buying also comes with longer-term volumes and obligations. I’m glad to see the trends that we’re seeing in the second quarter, but we still have a ways to go to get to our normalized margin levels. This will require stable and longer-term demand trends to continue. I feel that we are in a strong position today to capitalize on such changes going forward. Thank you. Operator, with that, we’ll turn — open the time up for Q&A.

Patrick Cunningham
Citigroup Inc., Research Division

In the release, you talked about the potential for a more durable return to mid-cycle profitability. This likely depends on both supply and demand side at this point. But can you give us the latest view on what this crisis may do in terms of supply side rationalization for MDI and polyurethanes? How do you see this playing out in terms of structural energy cost pressure, feedstock availability or potential closures at this point?

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

I don’t see a great deal of structural change as we look at MDI. I do see pressures continuing in Europe. If you’re a European producer now having to put up with natural gas that’s priced somewhere in the mid-teens versus where we are today, I noticed in the Houston Ship channel Price this morning was under $2 per MMBtu. These are real material gaps in shifts. I can’t help but think that there’s going to be continued pressure on petrochemical producers across the board and in MDI across Europe.

But having said that, I also think that there are probably some structural issues that may make Chinese exports in certain products. I won’t get into exactly which products those are, but I think that they’re varied across the board. if you’re relying on coal as a raw material in China, you’re probably doing quite well. If you’re integrated into a world-scale refinery and integrated system in China, you’re probably doing quite well. If you’re part of what they call the teapot collection of refineries integrated into export-bound chemical facilities, you may be under some cost pressures as you see some of the discounted crude products.

So it’s not just what we see from a competitive point of view. It’s also what we see from the raw material that many of our customers and many of our competitors and the industry in general will be facing. And I think those are some of the longer-term issues that we’ll be dealing with even after the Strait of Hormuz hopefully open soon here.

Kevin McCarthy
Vertical Research Partners, LLC

Peter, can you speak to operating rates in MDI, both for Huntsman and also what you’re observing at the industry level? And related to that, how are things changing post-war versus pre-war?

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

I think that as we look at the industry in general, you’re probably looking at the low to mid-80s. And I think now from where we are, we would be in the high 80s. We’re sold out completely in our Chinese operation. Our U.S. operation for the most part is sold out. Europe, as we said in the — when we announced our first quarter earnings before the Middle East conflict, we’re starting to see some green shoots there. We continue to see some opportunities in Europe. And I would say that we’re operating at pretty good levels across the board.

There have been a number of outages and I would say, short term and also planned disruptions in the industry, not to be too unexpected. When you go have an industry that’s been operating kind of at a low probably 70%, 80% for the last couple of years. And now all of a sudden, you see an increase in demand and pull-through, you typically have operating issues. So I can’t speak about the competition, but I can just say in our facilities, all 3 of our MDI facilities, our associates there have done a fantastic job in their operations.

Kevin McCarthy
Vertical Research Partners, LLC

And then secondly, I imagine your PO/MTBE joint venture in China has become more profitable. Maybe you can talk about what you might expect for equity earnings trajectory moving forward.

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

Yes. Certainly, in the past, it’s been a little bit of a drag on us. I think today, we’re probably in the low to mid-single-digit millions of dollars of impact on that business. So certainly doing better than it has been in the past. And I would hope that MTBE, that C-Factors should improve as you get more into the driving season, but that’s — there’s just so much volatility right now in the whole refining chain and what’s going on with PO economics. That would be probably be one of the murkier businesses that we have as far as looking into the future.

Philip Lister
Executive VP & CFO

Remember, Kevin, the price of gasoline is managed differently in China than elsewhere in the world. So MTBE margins aren’t what you would expect in China, where the Chinese joint venture is making money today is on propylene oxide and the margins that we’re seeing there over and above propylene.

Frank Mitsch
Fermium Research, LLC

That’s interesting. So PO is doing better than MTBE in China. Thanks for that enlightenment. Peter, I was wondering if you could speak to the polyurethane and MDI pricing initiatives that are underway, how that relates to underlying benzene costs and what sort of successes are you seeing or not on that front?

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

Well, I’d say that we’re seeing a — we’re certainly staying ahead of the benzene curve never as far ahead as I would like to see it. I’d like to see it multiple times better than what we’re seeing. But I highly compliment our sales and marketing groups on their aggressiveness and making sure that we’re covering our raw material costs and staying ahead of that. So yes, both from a volumetric basis, we’ll see a positive influence on it and also margin expansion above and beyond raw materials, we should see expansion on that.

Frank Mitsch
Fermium Research, LLC

All right. Terrific. So margin expansion. So if I think about the price/mix for Huntsman overall, it’s been negative for several quarters here. Given these initiatives that you have underway, is the expectation for the full company to show positive price/mix here in 2Q and hopefully beyond?

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

Certainly, in Q2, hopefully, beyond, I would reinforce that as well. I mean, as I look at some of the pricing trends that we’re seeing going into the second quarter, just to give you an idea in North America, I’m talking about all products, all prices. So I’m not talking about any one division, but we have not seen a quarter-on-quarter growth in pricing trends. I mean unfortunately, you’re right in what you said earlier. We haven’t seen that since 2022. So the trends that we’re seeing right now and the jump that we’re seeing on a quarterly basis right now in North America, we haven’t seen that in years now. Europe isn’t too dissimilar.

We’ve seen a few quarters here and there where we’ve seen some up pricing, but that’s more to do because of the strength of our Advanced Materials business in Europe, not because of the macro trends there. So yes, I like where we’re going into the second quarter. And my only question is how sustainable is it? But it’s — look, it’s a lot better than where we were a quarter ago.

Hassan Ahmed
Alembic Global Advisors

Peter, I just wanted to revisit some of the earlier commentary around MDI supply, both as it pertains to the product as well as the feedstock. I mean there’s at least one facility in Saudi Arabia that seems to be offline. And then obviously, I would imagine there would be sort of broader issues in terms of the availability and pricing of benzene as well as methanol. So could you comment a bit about sort of operating rates for MDI, keeping in mind some of these outages as well as some of the feedstock availability issues the world may be encountering and how long it may take for some of these bottlenecks, if peace was declared tomorrow to sort of be ironed out of the system?

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

Yes. I think that as we look, you made reference to a Middle East producer. That’s roughly about 4% of global capacity. So if you kind of think that the industry is operating in the low to mid-80s, that would say that we’re kind of pushing the mid- to upper 80s at 90% capacity utilization globally. Now again, that’s not across the board. There’ll be parts that are better than that and parts that are worse than that. But just globally, across the board, when you reach 90% in the MDI industry, given what people have a stated capacity and the outages that take place on a yearly basis for maintenance and so forth, you’re really in an industry that starts to strain at 90-plus percent capacity.

So I mean, statistically on paper, you can see where the industry is now moving into the upper 80s. In some region of the world, it’s going to be, again, better and worse. I’ve not seen or heard of any problems with the procurement of raw materials in MDI around the world. And the pricing of that raw material so far has been pretty much in line with oil. So that would tell me that there’s a pretty decent supply of it that’s available. But — longer term, my biggest question on MDI is going to be the sustainability of the demand because, again, previous to February 28, I would say that — I don’t want to say that we were going great guns.

So we’re starting to see some green shoots in Europe as we reported earlier. We are moving into the North American housing season. And China was stable and in pretty decent shape. So my whole question is really around sustainability of demand as you start looking out in the third and fourth quarter. And like I said, Hassan, it’s just too early to start looking at those order trends.

Hassan Ahmed
Alembic Global Advisors

Understood. And as a follow-up, you mentioned the polyurethane market in Europe, obviously, was volumes-wise up 4%, which obviously is decent. But in your prepared remarks, you obviously talked about easier compares as well because last year, you obviously had the sort of Rotterdam sort of turnaround. What green shoots are you guys seeing volumes-wise in Europe? And over the last couple of quarters, obviously, along EBITDA lines, it seems for the PU business, EBITDA was negative. Have you guys currently sort of turned that around? Is it actually generating positive EBITDA now?

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

Yes. To look at your first area, I would think that CWP composite wood products in Europe is looking pretty good. Technical insulation is — and that would be your sandwich boards and so forth that are going into data centers, warehouses, prefabricated buildings and so forth. Your ACE business, adhesions, coatings, elastomers business is doing. Again, I don’t want to paint the details of going through the roof in Europe, but we’re seeing some green shoots in these areas, badly needed, by the way. And so yes, I think that certainly is moving towards an area where we don’t just want to see a positive EBITDA coming from Europe, but we want to see positive cash coming out of Europe. And so yes, we’re at that precipice and seeing things improve.

Philip Lister
Executive VP & CFO

And Hassan, as we sit here today, we would expect Europe to be positive from an EBITDA perspective.

Michael Sison
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Research Division

When I take a look at your outlook for Polyurethanes for 2Q, margins look like they’re going to improve a little bit, but not a lot. So what do you think needs to happen to get the EBITDA margins for polyurethanes at better levels going forward? And just curious what the pricing for the segment should imply for 2Q year-over-year?

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

I think the 2 things that we need more than anything else are demand and raw material stability. We’re projecting in the second quarter that we’ll take in well in excess of around $100 million of raw material costs, and we expect to offset that and get prices higher than that. But that’s a tremendous amount of raw material costs that we’re absorbing in one quarter. And of course, in order to have any sustainability in pricing and pull-through pricing, we’ve got to see the demand. So I did note in my prepared remarks, a cautionary note on inflation and what inflation factors may play in Europe. But there’s also — I’d say on one hand, there’s those inflation factors that give me concern. On the other hand, Europe has been so lethargic for so long.

I can’t help but think that there is pent-up demand, whether it be in housing or remodeling and just industrial demand, defense rebuild and so forth across the board. So that’s going to be for the second half of the year, the single biggest variable in my opinion, is going to be demand.

Vincent Andrews
Morgan Stanley, Research Division

Just want to try to piece together a couple of the comments you made, Peter, as it relates to polyurethanes. And if I’m conflating things, please obviously correct me. But you’re talking about how you’ve been able to get pricing ahead of benzene, and we traditionally think of you having about a 2-month lag of benzene flowing through. And then maybe later in the year, we may see some negative demand elasticity from the consumer at the end market working its way back up the supply chain. So do we think about 2Q, your spreads being strong because you’re ahead of that benzene and then maybe benzene catches up with you in 3Q, and then we have to see how much more pricing you can get and that, I guess, would be a function of demand. So are we thinking 2Q and 3Q may be flattish in terms of profitability in polyurethanes? Or do you think 3Q could actually be up a little bit or maybe it would be down a little bit? What’s your latest thinking on that?

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

Well, far too early to comment on Q3. Again, I believe Q3 is going to be more demand-driven than anything else. I do — the trends that I’m seeing today, we are staying ahead of the price on benzene. We also are picking up some volume that we see on a year-to-year sort of growth basis. And we’re going to continue to be pushing prices through. Now again, the ability to push those prices through will be predicated on macro demand and so forth. And as I get into the third quarter, and again, I don’t want to be overly pessimistic about that. I merely say that is right now, there’s — I feel there’s a bit of euphoria in the industry, and I love seeing it. I think it was long overdue. I hope it continues into the third and fourth quarter, but a lot of that is just too early to tell on demand.

Matthew Blair
Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. Securities, LLC, Research Division

I was hoping you could talk a little bit more about just underlying construction activity. One of your peers mentioned that it has been weakening. You talked about the diversion in March data between starts and permits. Are there any trends in Q2 on construction activity that you can share so far?

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

I would say that we’re not seeing a drop-off, but we’re also not seeing a lot of improvement. And I think that I would say right now, it certainly isn’t shaping to be a bad season for us. It’s just not a lot of growth in that. So I’d say, yes, there’s some stability. But I’m sorry, I probably should be saying it’s either going up or it’s going down, but it seems to be quite stable at the present time. That’s why I say there’s some decent trends on housing starts that feel pretty good. And we’re — I think in the second quarter going into the third quarter, we’ll probably see 2%, 3% low single-digit growth in construction this year. But I’m also concerned when you see a 10% drop in 1 month in housing residential permits. Again, that’s a step before the housing starts. So again, I don’t want to get — I don’t want to read too much into a single quarter of data because February, both of those numbers were the complete opposite. Permits were up and starts were down. So I think we’ll probably see some very gradual growth this year.

Matthew Blair
Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. Securities, LLC, Research Division

Sounds good. And then I was also intrigued by your comment that you’re seeing some customers that are buying ahead of expected price increases. Is this occurring in some products more than others? And if so, which products? And then also on a regional basis, would this be something that’s more prevalent in Europe relative to the Americas?

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

Yes. I would say that as we look at it, you’re probably talking about 2, 3 days of — on MDI. That would be the area where we probably see the most prebuying. So I’m going to just say that there’s — I wouldn’t say that there’s a big wave of capacity that is being pulled through. I think that we’re managing that very carefully as well. So customers coming in and increasing their orders from where they were just a few weeks ago, we’re discouraging that and making sure that we kind of keep an equilibrium on orders and so forth. And in other areas where people are coming in that haven’t bought from us for some time on a spot basis, we’re seeing if we can’t extend contracts from what you need over the next month or 2 to what you need over the next year or so. Some of our Performance Products customers and so forth that may have shifted supplies to China out from Europe and the U.S., for example.

So yes, I think on both of these demand trends, we need to make sure on those that are — there’s a difference between those that are spot buying, panic buying and those that are just trying to buy ahead of a price increase. They all need to be managed a little bit different. Sorry, there’s not one size that fits all. But right now, if there is pre-buying that’s taking place, I would be very worried if we were seeing what would be the equivalent of a week or 2 or 3 of prebuying taking place. I would say right now, we’re seeing low number of days. of inventory that is prebuying at this point.

Jeffrey Zekauskas
JPMorgan Chase & Co, Research Division

Can you comment on how much Chinese MDI is coming into Europe?

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

It hasn’t been all that much. I wouldn’t say that it’s anything out of the ordinary. It’s been pretty stable with where it’s been the last couple of quarters. And so it’s — I would say, if anything, maybe it’s even a little bit slightly lower than what it’s averaged over the last year or so. So nothing that would be — nothing that would have a material impact on the industry or pricing there.

Michael Harrison
Seaport Research Partners

Peter, you mentioned in the prepared remarks there that we’re still meaningfully below mid-cycle margins in the Polyurethanes business. And I was wondering if you can provide any kind of an updated view on where you think mid-cycle margins could be. I’ll hold off on asking you when you think you can get there. But what is the appropriate mid-cycle margin level for Polyurethanes?

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

Well, I think that we’re probably — I’ve always thought of it more on what is it on an EBITDA on average basis. And I think that business on average ought to be a mid-teen sort of a business. And how soon do I expect that to happen as soon as possible. Sorry, guys. Yes, it’s long overdue.

Joshua Spector
UBS Investment Bank, Research Division

I wanted to see if I could just follow up on kind of the benzene MDI math in 2Q here. Just trying to think about if we say volumes are stable into 3Q, you’re pricing ahead of raws in 2Q, is that a headwind in that your raws are going to catch up a bit more from inventory in 3Q? Or are you exiting with enough price where you’d say that earnings in polyurethanes would be stable sequentially in that scenario?

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

Yes. I would say that we are exiting Q2 able to stay ahead of the raw materials that we see going into Q3. And we’re also working towards more price increases to come in that area. So — I mean, as I sit here today, looking at unless there’s a cataclysmic change economically, we will stay ahead of our raw material costs going into Q3.

Philip Lister
Executive VP & CFO

Josh, benzene just settled at [indiscernible]. The point is we’re ahead of that, and we’ll stay ahead of it.

Laurence Alexander
Jefferies LLC, Research Division

But I guess I appreciate that no one wants the customers to build up inventory, but is it unusual for — with this kind of spike where several companies are out publicly talking about imminent shortages in different molecules that people who may see higher prices in the future aren’t trying to pull forward orders? Is that unusual?

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

No, I don’t think that’s unusual at all. I don’t think that we’re at a point — I mean, I’m not saying I don’t wish we were, but I don’t think we’re at a point in MDI at this time where we’re seeing shortages and people saying, I can’t get it. I think that there are people that are concerned as they look at their supplier — with their suppliers with announced turnarounds that have been scheduled for multiple years that are taking place and so forth. Some of the disruptions that you’re seeing in some of the energy flows and shipping flows — but I’m not seeing panic buying at this point, but I am seeing higher capacity utilization. So I think that there’s an improvement in market conditions for the producers, but consumers can still get the product.

Arun Viswanathan
RBC Capital Markets, Research Division

I guess we did hear about an outage with Wanhua a couple of days ago. And maybe I can just get your thoughts on that, if you think that, that could tighten up markets. And then I guess maybe you were asked this question earlier, apologies if so. But what is kind of the potential for those utilization rates to remain consistently above 90%? Do you see any permanent kind of supply activities that could arise in the next few months? Obviously, it depends on duration, but — of the conflict. But what are your — are your customers kind of migrating to you in the face of other supply shocks or disruptions? Is there a share gain opportunity as well?

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

Yes. Arun, good question. I’m not sure necessarily what’s happened with the competitor facility. When they do have multiyear closures, when I say multiyear, I mean, oftentimes, when you do a large-scale closure on a vast petrochemical site, you’re renting equipment, you’re planning equipment, you’re planning workforces usually 18, 24 months in advance. I mean you know these things are coming and people are exchanging materials. I know that’s happening. I’ve heard — read that a splitter may have gone down or something. I’ve not read that a facility, there’s been a large-scale cataclysmic outage or anything like that.

I think that we’re probably as an industry operating in the high 80s right now, depending on product flow in the Middle East. That’s going to be a bit volatile right now with some of these large — remember in China, you’ve got single site facilities of 1 million metric ton sites. When those go down, a site that big, you will fill it globally. And if they’re down for an extra couple of weeks because of a problem or whatever, you’ll feel it acutely on a short-term basis. So we’ll continue to take — I think as we look right now, our facilities are operating well, and we’re in a position where we can be a strong and reliable supplier.

Arun Viswanathan
RBC Capital Markets, Research Division

Okay. And then the other question I had was just on the PO market. Obviously, there’s some tightness there, but there was also a reduction of capacity by one of the suppliers recently, and I know one of the other plants are down. So are you guys feeling like your own kind of procurement for the Polyurethanes business is intact? Or do you foresee any supply disruptions or rerouting of your supply chain that would be required?

Peter Huntsman
Chairman, President & CEO

No, we don’t see any disruption in our PO supply right now. We’ve got a good supplier that’s plant operating, and I feel that we’re covered with that. And we’ve also got an excellent supply source in China as well. So I feel we’re okay with that. Operator, why don’t we take one more question, and we’ll let people get on their way.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4897494-huntsman-corporation-hun-q1-2026-earnings-call-transcript?mailingid=45505368&messageid=2800&position=rta_analysis_1parag_main_3_textlink&serial=45505368.28&source=email_2800

Source