<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/feedblitz_rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
<channel>
	<title>Food Politics by Marion Nestle</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.foodpolitics.com/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 13:00:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">106065139</site>
<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<item>
<feedburner:origLink>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/weekend-reading-christopher-gardners-food-sense/</feedburner:origLink>
		<title>Weekend reading: Christopher Gardner&#8217;s Food Sense</title>
		<link>https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971908265/0/foodpolitics~Weekend-reading-Christopher-Gardners-Food-Sense/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 13:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=29425</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Christopher Gardner.  Food Sense: The Science and Practice of Eating Well.  Simon Element, 2026 (287 pages). Christopher Gardner and I were doing book events at the same time within a couple of miles of each other in Marin County, mine at Book Passage in Corte Madera, and his at Copperfields in Larkspur.  We met for [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971908265/0/foodpolitics~Weekend-reading-Christopher-Gardners-Food-Sense/">Weekend reading: Christopher Gardner&#8217;s Food Sense</a> appeared first on <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971908265/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971908265/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971908265/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971908265/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/weekend-reading-science-politics/">Weekend reading: Science Politics</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/weekend-re-reading-fast-food-nation/">Weekend (Re-)reading: Eric Schlosser&#8217;s Fast Food Nation</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/reflections-on-my-90th-birthday-and-food-politics/">Reflections on my 90th birthday&#8212;and food politics</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christopher Gardner.  Food Sense: The Science and Practice of Eating Well.  Simon Element, 2026 (287 pages).</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://med.stanford.edu/profiles/christopher-gardner">Christopher Gardner</a> and I were doing book events at the same time within a couple of miles of each other in Marin County, mine at Book Passage in Corte Madera, and his at Copperfields in Larkspur.  We met for lunch after our talks (thanks to <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://haas.berkeley.edu/faculty/rosenzweig-william/">Will Rosenzweig</a>).</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29444" src="https://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/IMG_4030-560x747.jpeg" alt="" width="560" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></p>
<p>I had done a blurb for his book:</p>
<blockquote><p>Here is Christopher Gardner’s remarkably sensible and easy-to-read philosophy of how to eat healthfully and enjoyably, based on his extensive and deep scientific training, experience running clinical trials, and—delightful surprise–cooking skills (the book has recipes!)<em>. </em>He uses all this to weigh in on your most perplexing questions about diet and health.  Food for thought!</p></blockquote>
<p>And here is a brief excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p>It makes sense that as a culture we’d be so interested in diet because we’ve been told for decades now that we as a society need to eat better, but the reality is that we’re up against a really powerful and entrenched food system that may have started with good intentions but hasn’t had our best interests at heart for some time.  The competing priorities of taste, cost, and convenience can make even simple and straightforward nutrition guidance seem complicated.  It’s a perfect environment for people to try to sell you miracle cures and quick fixes…So what do we do?  Well, we need to empower ourselves with everything we’ve got to cut through the noise…[the approach you take] has to be louder than the messages you’re getting from, well, everywhere…most importantly, it needs to offer you a strong foundation based in science with lots of room for flexibility (pp. 6-7).</p></blockquote>
<p>A few chapter titles:</p>
<ul>
<li>The Diet Wars</li>
<li>Yes, You Probably Get Enough Protein</li>
<li>Seed Oil Slander</li>
<li>Plant-Based Meats—Instead of What?</li>
<li>Sugar Is Sugar, and Less Is Always Better</li>
</ul>
<p>It’s a great read.  Take a look!</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/weekend-reading-christopher-gardners-food-sense/">Weekend reading: Christopher Gardner&#8217;s Food Sense</a> appeared first on <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<Img align="left" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt="" style="border:0;float:left;margin:0;padding:0;width:1px!important;height:1px!important;" hspace="0" src="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/i/971908265/0/foodpolitics">
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971908265/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971908265/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971908265/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971908265/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/weekend-reading-science-politics/">Weekend reading: Science Politics</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/weekend-re-reading-fast-food-nation/">Weekend (Re-)reading: Eric Schlosser&#8217;s Fast Food Nation</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/reflections-on-my-90th-birthday-and-food-politics/">Reflections on my 90th birthday&#8212;and food politics</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29425</post-id></item>
<item>
<feedburner:origLink>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/29430/</feedburner:origLink>
		<title>Guidelines for talking about pet obesity with respect</title>
		<link>https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971877701/0/foodpolitics~Guidelines-for-talking-about-pet-obesity-with-respect/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 13:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pet food]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=29430</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>I have a long-standing interest in pet food and subscribe to Pet Food Industry, a truly superb trade publication.  It recently carried this item (don’t miss its AI illustration): Pet food marketers’ guide to blame-free obesity communication: Respectful communication does not require avoiding the word obesity. The guide favors precise descriptions over euphemisms that can minimize a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971877701/0/foodpolitics~Guidelines-for-talking-about-pet-obesity-with-respect/">Guidelines for talking about pet obesity with respect</a> appeared first on <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971877701/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971877701/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971877701/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971877701/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/08/three-items-about-pet-food-politics/">Four items about pet food politics</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/08/pet-food-safety-and-other-issues-a-short-roundup/">Pet food safety and other issues: a short roundup</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a long-standing interest in pet food and subscribe to <em>Pet Food Industry, </em>a truly superb trade publication.  It recently carried this item (don’t miss its AI illustration):</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wattglobal.omeclk.com_portal_wts_ug-255Ecnj-2DdmODbaO0jbC-257CBqd4FF-2Dn6Egpm4Do9tm92a&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=HyKp9A1n4Sme7fhoXWQc-213oqEZVmlYI9cViPdulX2-aXZ096nx_PGYAgDK28wf&amp;s=l1XiitrT_0cNWHlASoEzenF7mk4JVaUjjdnOSGLZz40&amp;e=">Pet food marketers’ guide to blame-free obesity communication</a>: </strong>Respectful communication does not require avoiding the word obesity. The guide favors precise descriptions over euphemisms that can minimize a health concern. <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wattglobal.omeclk.com_portal_wts_ug-255Ecnj-2DdmODbaO0jbC-257CB-255Ed4FF-2Dn6Egpm4Do9tm92a&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=HyKp9A1n4Sme7fhoXWQc-213oqEZVmlYI9cViPdulX2-aXZ096nx_PGYAgDK28wf&amp;s=ThLwygsJOTjUlQjbj23TNpYw5Is7hHNMW_BOcTyHmWY&amp;e=">Read more</a></p></blockquote>
<p>It seems that the <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.petobesityprevention.org/">Association for Pet Obesity Prevention</a> (yes, this organization exists) has published <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.petobesityprevention.org/communication-guidelines" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">2026 Pet Obesity Communication Guidelines</a>.</p>
<p>These advise the same kinds of things as <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://conscienhealth.org/">ConscienHealth</a> advises for health professionals dealing with humans with obesity.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="content-geo-summary__body">
<div class="content-geo-summary__key-facts">
<ul>
<li>Describe pets as having a condition rather than defining them by weight—say <strong>“a dog with obesity”</strong> instead of <strong>“an obese dog”</strong></li>
<li>Connect messaging to health goals like <strong>mobility, quality of life, and comfort</strong> rather than weight loss guarantees</li>
<li>Avoid shock-value images, before-and-after campaigns without context, and language that shames pet owners or ridicules animals</li>
<li>Direct owners toward <strong>veterinary consultation</strong> with specific, actionable next steps rather than immediate diet changes</li>
<li>Test messages with your target audience to ensure clarity and identify whether wording feels accusatory or prevents action</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div class="content-geo-summary__body">
<div class="content-geo-summary__key-facts">
<p>The Communication Guidelines have lots of useful suggestions.  For example:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29432" src="https://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/Screenshot-2026-10-18-171007-560x185.png" alt="" width="560" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="content-geo-summary__body">
<p>Obesity is rampant in dogs and cats.  Veterinarians have a lot of work to do.  This guide should help.</p>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/29430/">Guidelines for talking about pet obesity with respect</a> appeared first on <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<Img align="left" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt="" style="border:0;float:left;margin:0;padding:0;width:1px!important;height:1px!important;" hspace="0" src="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/i/971877701/0/foodpolitics">
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971877701/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971877701/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971877701/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971877701/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/08/three-items-about-pet-food-politics/">Four items about pet food politics</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/08/pet-food-safety-and-other-issues-a-short-roundup/">Pet food safety and other issues: a short roundup</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29430</post-id></item>
<item>
<feedburner:origLink>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/draft-nestle-in-russia/</feedburner:origLink>
		<title>Russia seizes Nestlé&#8217;s assets over support for Ukraine</title>
		<link>https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971845388/0/foodpolitics~Russia-seizes-Nestl%c3%a9s-assets-over-support-for-Ukraine/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nestlé]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=29310</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>FoodNavigator.com ran this item a couple of weeks ago.  I haven’t seen much about it in the US press. Nestlé Russia falls under Kremlin control: Food and beverage giant vows to protect its rights after Russia transfers control of local business to state-appointed administrator. Read more Apparently, Russia is transferring Nestlé’s assets to LEV Management based [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971845388/0/foodpolitics~Russia-seizes-Nestl%c3%a9s-assets-over-support-for-Ukraine/">Russia seizes Nestlé&#8217;s assets over support for Ukraine</a> appeared first on <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971845388/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971845388/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971845388/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971845388/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/what-are-the-top-food-brands/">What are the top food brands?</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FoodNavigator.com ran this item a couple of weeks ago.  I haven’t seen much about it in the US press.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2026/09/18/nestle-russia-under-state-administration-following-kremlin-decree/?utm_source=BreakingNews&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=18-Sep-2026&amp;cid=DM1295673&amp;bid=1081108858"><strong>Nestlé Russia falls under Kremlin control: </strong></a>Food and beverage giant vows to protect its rights after Russia transfers control of local business to state-appointed administrator. <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__t.marketing1.william-2Dreed.com_r_-3Fid-3Dh4070697a-2C49939862-2C42f04d23-26e-3DY2lkPURNMTI5NTY3MyZiaWQ9MTA4MTEwODg1OA-26s-3DR9AYiEmg3OWQ6FVYKS1As27GVISyK-5Fkz7HCCwu8Uzy0&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=_pQDssR4s3ppQTyj4QS90gP2iM0De-mIFo4ZXB0qQ_pOP8Jrz_x1G2C3bS4J_Mfw&amp;s=MLDFfEzCQ-YZu4mYhAd3Vzwmt_ue1eh0d9p9fO74kXQ&amp;e="><strong>Read more</strong></a></p></blockquote>
<p>Apparently, Russia is transferring Nestlé’s assets to LEV Management based in Moscow.  Not much is known about that company; it was created in 2025 and nobody knows what it does, according to the account in <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2026/09/18/russia-seizes-assets-of-french-firms-auchan-and-leroy-merlin_6757662_4.html?srsltid=AU7gw4VooGHrpteoM19iNLljoUJVNxgVIw9wIYi8zSSTvkWxRdtuYril"><em>Le Monde, </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Russian authorities have seized the businesses and assets of Swiss food giant Nestlé and three French groups, a move the Kremlin defended Friday, September 18, as a justified measure against firms representing “unfriendly countries” that back Ukraine.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Le Monde </em>quotes Nestlé as saying the company is “assessing the situation and its options.” Nestlé is said to have 6 factories in Russia employing around 7,000 people, who produce coffee, pet care, infant nutrition and confectionary products.  Russia accounts for about 1% of the group’s sales, down from around 2% before the Ukraine war.</p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.nestle.com/"> Nestlé</a> (no relation) is a huge company in 185 countries with 271,000 employees, sales of $89.5 billion and 30 brands generation a $billion or more annually.</p>
<p>The seizure won’t hurt Nestlé much (we can ask why Nestlé was in Putin’s Russia in the first place) but it’s a sure sign that US food companies need to get out of there.</p>
<p>As I keep saying, the food industry is in big trouble these days.  Here is one more piece of evidence.</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/draft-nestle-in-russia/">Russia seizes Nestlé&#8217;s assets over support for Ukraine</a> appeared first on <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<Img align="left" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt="" style="border:0;float:left;margin:0;padding:0;width:1px!important;height:1px!important;" hspace="0" src="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/i/971845388/0/foodpolitics">
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971845388/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971845388/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971845388/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971845388/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/what-are-the-top-food-brands/">What are the top food brands?</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29310</post-id></item>
<item>
<feedburner:origLink>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/29440/</feedburner:origLink>
		<title>Most studies criticizing the Nova classification of ultra-processed foods are funded by food companies</title>
		<link>https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971812307/0/foodpolitics~Most-studies-criticizing-the-Nova-classification-of-ultraprocessed-foods-are-funded-by-food-companies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 13:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflicts-of-interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sponsored-research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultraprocessed]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=29440</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Jerry Mande of Nourish Science sent me this item from The Examination: Junk food researcher finds hidden hand in ultraprocessed foods debate. This, in turn, referred to Nine in ten research papers disputing definition of ultraprocessed foods have industry ties, study finds. This, in further turn, referred to a study in the American Journal of Public [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971812307/0/foodpolitics~Most-studies-criticizing-the-Nova-classification-of-ultraprocessed-foods-are-funded-by-food-companies/">Most studies criticizing the Nova classification of ultra-processed foods are funded by food companies</a> appeared first on <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971812307/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971812307/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971812307/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971812307/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/29417/">Industry-funded study of the week: artificially sweetened drinks vs. water</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/industry-funded-study-of-the-week-2/">Industry-funded study of the week: the American Beverage Association at work</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/industry-funded-study-of-the-week-dairy-trans-fats/">Industry-funded study of the week: dairy trans fats</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry Mande of <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://nourishscience.org">Nourish Science</a> sent me this item from <em>The Examination: </em><a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://mailchi.mp/8a26fa3f1aae/as-lead-cleanup-begins-a-community-waits-for-answers-18006334?e=6473528fc5"><strong>Junk food researcher finds hidden hand in ultraprocessed foods debate.</strong></a></p>
<p>This, in turn, referred to <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.theexamination.org/articles/nova-ultraprocessed-foods-industry-ties-study"><strong>Nine in ten research papers disputing definition of ultraprocessed foods have industry ties, study finds.</strong></a></p>
<p>This, in further turn, referred to a study in the American Journal of Public Health:<strong> <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42753229/">Characterizing Food Industry Affiliations Among Critics of the Nova Food Classification System: A Systematic Review. </a></strong>Am J Public Health. <span class="cit">2026 Nov;116(11):1790-1799. </span><a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42753229/"><span class="citation-doi">doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2026.308691.</span> <span class="secondary-date">Epub 2026 Sep 17.</span></a></p>
<h3 class="mcePastedContent"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Results</strong></span></h3>
<p class="mcePastedContent">Of 69 articles from 2009 to 2025 criticizing the Nova classification system for ultra-processed foods or defending ultra-processed foods:</p>
<ul>
<li>91.3% involved at least 1 industry-affiliated author</li>
<li>68.5% of 232 total authors had food industry ties</li>
<li>65.2% of articles were published in journals associated with nutrition societies with disclosed industry partnerships.</li>
</ul>
<p>Arguments defending or promoting ultraprocessed foods appeared in</p>
<ul>
<li>39.7% of articles with direct industry ties</li>
<li>60.0% with organizational or governmental industry ties</li>
<li>16.7% of articles with no identified ties.</li>
</ul>
<h3><b><span style="color: #ff0000;">Conclusion</span></b></h3>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Given the tobacco industry’s well-documented strategy of manufacturing academic doubt about its products’ harms, these findings raise concern that the</span> food industry may be following a similar playbook as evidence for the health risks of ultraprocessed foods continues to grow.</p>
<h3><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Comment</strong></span></h3>
<p>These results certainly do raise concern.  They confirm what I’ve long suspected.  The food industry does not like the concept of ultra-processed food.  Defining it makes research possible.  This research shows diets high in ultra-processed foods to be bad for health.  If people eat less of them, sales and profits will decline (and this is already happening).  The main opposition to defining ultra-processed foods and advice to eat less of them comes from the food industry (other opposition comes from nutrition researchers who object to the focus on processing rather than nutrient content).  This study provides further evidence for the bias introduced by industry funding of research.</p>
<p><strong>The bottom line:</strong> not eating too much ultra-processed junk food is likely to improve health.</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/29440/">Most studies criticizing the Nova classification of ultra-processed foods are funded by food companies</a> appeared first on <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<Img align="left" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt="" style="border:0;float:left;margin:0;padding:0;width:1px!important;height:1px!important;" hspace="0" src="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/i/971812307/0/foodpolitics">
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971812307/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971812307/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971812307/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971812307/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/29417/">Industry-funded study of the week: artificially sweetened drinks vs. water</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/industry-funded-study-of-the-week-2/">Industry-funded study of the week: the American Beverage Association at work</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/industry-funded-study-of-the-week-dairy-trans-fats/">Industry-funded study of the week: dairy trans fats</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29440</post-id></item>
<item>
<feedburner:origLink>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/29417/</feedburner:origLink>
		<title>Industry-funded study of the week: artificially sweetened drinks vs. water</title>
		<link>https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971779541/0/foodpolitics~Industryfunded-study-of-the-week-artificially-sweetened-drinks-vs-water/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 13:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Beverage Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflicts-of-interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soft drinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sponsored-research]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=29417</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Phil Baker sent me this one: The Study: Effect of non-nutritive sweetened beverages v. water on body weight: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial.   Joanne A. Harrold , Scott Hill, Cristina Radu, Paul Thomas, Paula Thorp, Charlotte A. Hardman, Paul Christiansen, Una Masic, Lauren McGale, Dan J. Cuthbertson and Jason C.G. Halford. . British [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971779541/0/foodpolitics~Industryfunded-study-of-the-week-artificially-sweetened-drinks-vs-water/">Industry-funded study of the week: artificially sweetened drinks vs. water</a> appeared first on <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971779541/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971779541/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971779541/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971779541/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/industry-funded-study-of-the-week-2/">Industry-funded study of the week: the American Beverage Association at work</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/29440/">Most studies criticizing the Nova classification of ultra-processed foods are funded by food companies</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/industry-funded-study-of-the-week-dairy-trans-fats/">Industry-funded study of the week: dairy trans fats</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.google.com/search?q=philip+baker+australia&amp;rlz=1C1GCPL_enUS1208US1208&amp;oq=philip+baker+australia&amp;gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIKCAEQABgKGBYYHjIICAIQABgWGB4yDQgDEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyDQgEEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyDQgFEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyCggGEAAYgAQYogQyBwgHEAAY7wUyCggIEAAYogQYiQUyBwgJEAAY7wXSAQg5ODkzajBqN6gCALACAA&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;source=chrome.ob&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sei=WEjVarChHbmVgLQP0MCyoQk">Phil Baker</a> sent me this one:</p>
<p><strong>The Study:<a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/60CB3ACE5AB706DB882C89E8C1B05318/S0007114526108150a.pdf/effect-of-non-nutritive-sweetened-beverages-v-water-on-body-weight-long-term-results-of-a-randomised-controlled-trial.pdf?fbclid=PAVERFWAUyeO9leHRuA2FlbQIxMABwZG9mAmZkaWQWUP2Q4onCSuKOGsFYpJ-OngVsPVGR9nNydGMGYXBwX2lkDzEyNDAyNDU3NDI4NzQxNAABp2IGjrfpu3YXQcQT2BL3EjQzQaLSohOokd-WaJjnrythkzx_yDfNQeshIYTD_aem_pSA6_zEfvWWSZ3jSpSZnlg"> Effect of non-nutritive sweetened beverages v. water on body weight: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial.  </a></strong> Joanne A. Harrold , Scott Hill, Cristina Radu, Paul Thomas, Paula Thorp, Charlotte A. Hardman, Paul Christiansen, Una Masic, Lauren McGale, Dan J. Cuthbertson and Jason C.G. Halford. . British Journal of Nutrition 136: 482–493. doi: 10.1017/ S0007114526108150</p>
<p><strong>Purpose:</strong> The aim of this study was to provide robust evidence on the long-term use of non-nutritive sweetened (NNS) beverages on weight management.</p>
<p><strong>Method:</strong> Compare NNS beverages to water during 1 year of assisted weight management followed by a voluntary, unassisted 1-year extension.</p>
<p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants consuming water maintained a weight loss of 3·7 kg over 104weeks, compared with 4·8 kg with NNS beverages (not statistically significant).</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest people can lose weight and maintain it for 2 years, when drinking either NNS beverages or water and taking part in weight-management programmes.</p>
<p><strong>Financial support.</strong> This trial was<span style="color: #ff0000"><strong> funded</strong> </span>by the American Beverage Association. The American Beverage Association was not involved in the design, conduct, analysis of data or interpretation of this trial; a representative from the American Beverage Association was provided with the <strong><span style="color: #ff0000">opportunity to review the manuscript.</span></strong> Final decisions regarding the content were made by the authors. The manuscript was developed with the assistance of a <span style="color: #ff0000"><strong>medical writer, funded by the American Beverage Association,</strong></span> under the direction of the authors. A third-party organisation (Biofortis) audited data at the clinical site to check for the accuracy and integrity of the data.</p>
<p><strong>Competing interests.</strong> Joanne A. Harrold reports <span style="color: #000000">funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the American Beverage Association for the present study. Outside of the submitted work, she reports a grant from the European Commission for the Horizon 2020 project SWEET. Scott Hill reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the American Beverage Association for the present study. Cristina Radu reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the American Beverage Association for the present study and funding from Coca Cola for a PhD studentship outside of the submitted work. Paul Thomas reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the American Beverage Association for the present study. Paula Thorp reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the American Beverage Association for the present study. Charlotte A. Hardma</span>n reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the American Beverage Association for the present study. Outside of the submitted work, she reports honoraria from the International Sweeteners Association, International Food Information Council and Mars Global Nutrition Advisory Council (paid to the University of Liverpool); grants from the European Commission for the Horizon 2020 project SWEET, the Biotechnology &amp; Biological Sciences Research Council and the Natural Environment Research Council (paid to the University of Liverpool); primary supervisor on a PhD studentship funded by Coca Cola (awarded to CR); personal fees for her role on the Food Standards Agency Advisory Committee on Social Sciences and an unpaid role as a trustee of Feeding Liverpool. Paul Christiansen reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the American Beverage Association for the present study. Outside of the submitted work, he reports grants from the European Commission for the Horizon 2020 project SWEET, the National Institute for Health and Care Research, the Home Office UK and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and personal fees from Kaplan and Crohn’sandColitisUK. Una Masic reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the American Beverage Association for the present study. Lauren McGale reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the American Beverage Association for the present study. Outside of the submitted work, she reports funding (paid to the University ofLiverpool) fromtheWHO,andfunding(paid to the University of Wollongong) from the Australian Government’s Department of Health and Aged Care. Daniel J. Cuthbertson reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the American Beverage Association for the present study. Outside of the submitted work, he reports funding from Novo Nordisk and AstraZeneca for investigator-initiated research and consultancy (paid to the University of Liverpool) and educational grants from Perspectum. Jason C.G. Halford reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the American Beverage Association for the present study. Outside of the submitted work, he reports a grant from the European Commission for the Horizon 2020 project SWEET; consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Dupont and Mars (all paid to the University of Leeds); honoraria from Novo Nordisk (paid to the University of Leeds); support for attending meetings from Novo Nordisk; financial support for participation in an advisory board for Dupont (paid to the University of Leeds); unpaid participation in an advisory board for the Sweet Tooth Project and unpaid board membership of the European Coalition of People Living with Obesity. He is treasurer of the World Obesity Federation.</p>
<p><strong>Comment: </strong>This study was commissioned by, paid for, and reviewed  by the American Beverage Association.  The authors were paid by the ABA to do the study (the University of Leeds must be a hotbed of research funded by the soda industry).  Why do this?  People consuming artificially sweetened drinks sometimes are shown to gain weight on them.  This study aimed to demonstrate—and did—that artificially sweetened drinks are as good as water during weight loss.  The ABA got what it paid for.</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/29417/">Industry-funded study of the week: artificially sweetened drinks vs. water</a> appeared first on <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<Img align="left" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt="" style="border:0;float:left;margin:0;padding:0;width:1px!important;height:1px!important;" hspace="0" src="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/i/971779541/0/foodpolitics">
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971779541/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971779541/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971779541/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971779541/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/industry-funded-study-of-the-week-2/">Industry-funded study of the week: the American Beverage Association at work</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/29440/">Most studies criticizing the Nova classification of ultra-processed foods are funded by food companies</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/industry-funded-study-of-the-week-dairy-trans-fats/">Industry-funded study of the week: dairy trans fats</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29417</post-id></item>
<item>
<feedburner:origLink>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/weekend-reading-maha-betrayed/</feedburner:origLink>
		<title>Weekend reading: MAHA betrayed</title>
		<link>https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971691149/0/foodpolitics~Weekend-reading-MAHA-betrayed/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 13:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAHA betrayed]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=29393</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the most complete analysis yet, Protect Our Care has issued a devastating report card on the failure of the Trump administration to keep its MAHA promises. The report: MAHA Betrayed: Trump, RFK Jr. Keep Selling Out Movement to Corporate Polluters and Poison Peddlers For over a year, Donald Trump and his Health Secretary Robert [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971691149/0/foodpolitics~Weekend-reading-MAHA-betrayed/">Weekend reading: MAHA betrayed</a> appeared first on <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971691149/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971691149/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971691149/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971691149/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/rfk-jr-letter-to-david-kesslers-citizens-petition-leaked/">RFK Jr letter to David Kessler&#8217;s citizen&#8217;s petition leaked</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/how-is-maha-doing-so-far-not-so-great/">How is MAHA doing so far?  Not so great.</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/snap-waivers-are-associated-with-short-term-decreases-in-soda-purchases/">SNAP waivers are associated with short-term decreases in soda purchases</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the most complete analysis yet, Protect Our Care has issued a devastating report card on the failure of the Trump administration to keep its MAHA promises.</p>
<p>The report: <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.protectourcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/MAHA_Betrayed-Report-9-2026.pdf"><strong>MAHA Betrayed: Trump, RFK Jr. Keep Selling Out Movement to Corporate Polluters and Poison Peddlers</strong></a></p>
<blockquote><p>For over a year, Donald Trump and his Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. promised the Make America Healthy Again movement that this administration would finally take on Big Food, Big Ag, and Big Chemical. Instead, they have delivered a steady diet of broken promises, corporate quid pro quos, and foodborne illnesses….But a year into his [RFK Jr’s] tenure, the receipts tell a different story: cancer-linked chemicals back on the market, food safety agencies gutted, families paying more for groceries, and even the movement’s founders wondering whether they’ve been put out to political pasture.</p></blockquote>
<p>The report details and documents broken promises about chemicals, pesticides, and corporate capture, especially to women.</p>
<p>Here is one item as an example:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Kennedy Stays Silent While EPA Betrays MAHA on Toxic Chemicals.</strong> While MAHA leaders have <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.vox.com/climate/393538/rfk-jr-maha-trump-environmental-movement-far-right">spoken out</a> about air and water pollutants, Trump’s EPA has now <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.eenews.net/articles/epa-drops-plans-to-release-a-maha-agenda/">shut down</a> plans to release a MAHA agenda and the NIH has <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/06/18/nx-s1-5436960/maha-rfk-toxic-chemicals-trump-hhs-epa">stopped accepting</a> submissions for its flagship journal on environmental health and yanked research grants.. EPA scientists were <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/08/politics/trump-epa-chemicals-political-pressure">pressured</a> to alter safety reviews of chemicals in household cleaners and cosmetics to make risks appear less serious than the data shows — whitewashing health risks of the products MAHA’s core constituency was promised would be regulated. At a chemicals summit, <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/06/18/nx-s1-5436960/maha-rfk-toxic-chemicals-trump-hhs-epa">Kennedy praised</a> an Oregon State researcher’s microplastics study from the podium — unaware, or unbothered, that an hour earlier she’d learned EPA had just terminated the grant funding that research.</p>
<p>Kennedy has <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.eenews.net/articles/rfk-jr-once-poisoned-by-mercury-is-silent-as-epa-weakens-rules-against-it/">stayed similarly silent</a> as EPA rolls back the very mercury rules he spent decades fighting for. As an environmental attorney, he sued over mercury pollution and personally developed “word retrieval and memory problems” from mercury-tainted fish. EPA announced its rollback of mercury emissions rules the day after the MAHA Commission, which Kennedy and Zeldin both sit on, held its first meeting. A recent <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.protectourcare.org/new-joint-report-trumps-pro-polluter-agenda-is-making-americans-sicker-while-he-increases-health-care-costs/">report</a> from Climate Power and Protect Our Care details how Trump has eliminated 31 pollution protections that, together, were set to deliver $275 billion in benefits per year and prevent 30,000 deaths annually.</p></blockquote>
<p>Take a look at the report.  The list is long, alas.</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/weekend-reading-maha-betrayed/">Weekend reading: MAHA betrayed</a> appeared first on <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<Img align="left" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt="" style="border:0;float:left;margin:0;padding:0;width:1px!important;height:1px!important;" hspace="0" src="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/i/971691149/0/foodpolitics">
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971691149/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971691149/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971691149/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971691149/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/rfk-jr-letter-to-david-kesslers-citizens-petition-leaked/">RFK Jr letter to David Kessler&#8217;s citizen&#8217;s petition leaked</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/how-is-maha-doing-so-far-not-so-great/">How is MAHA doing so far?  Not so great.</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/snap-waivers-are-associated-with-short-term-decreases-in-soda-purchases/">SNAP waivers are associated with short-term decreases in soda purchases</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29393</post-id></item>
<item>
<feedburner:origLink>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/the-food-system-uses-a-lot-of-water/</feedburner:origLink>
		<title>The food system uses a lot of water</title>
		<link>https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971628662/0/foodpolitics~The-food-system-uses-a-lot-of-water/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 13:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=29401</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>I was interested to see this chart from the USDA: Chart of Note: U.S. food system required greater share of national water use compared to employment or energy use:  Water, labor, and energy are resources relied upon throughout the U.S. food system. The food system comprehensively required more than a quarter of total U.S. freshwater use [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971628662/0/foodpolitics~The-food-system-uses-a-lot-of-water/">The food system uses a lot of water</a> appeared first on <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971628662/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971628662/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971628662/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971628662/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/labor-day-a-food-politics-reminder/">Labor Day: a food politics reminder</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/08/concentration-in-agriculture-2/">Concentration in agriculture: a big problem getting bigger</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/28578/">Do salmon really get high on cocaine? And will you if you eat it?</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was interested to see this chart from the USDA: <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__fnrkbelab.cc.rs6.net_tn.jsp-3Ff-3D0016455o1vIBL5536z1OxtQ-2DSJzcrkuFLPelGzG2EVuydiAUuXEZvMKsUgQtjvvhu-5F1V3VjL7Z3LRFhso8X6y-2DqqH-5FRiHMiD5ktJlpapbylcPY5OEVC7OdIqQtg3SMkGGGrI7-5FEiEaZb3n3mbXQn83DvQDC3VglhBWpFF77cOJHyvvLV-2DfHjLITaNWDAHD8ttudgveSef498H3ZPvS-2Dlv-2D9-5FT-2D1WBOsdmko-26c-3D-5FNoOO4dvfq3rAr5yVR7CP1Nt7ZjbpTT88IebvbNw-2D-5FWwZoYe8puoNA-3D-3D-26ch-3DWhoJQyDRrDhk7rApC-2DDfjmci9kBfUtFpYcpH7wjzDT0YOxyQc-5FeNmg-3D-3D&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=GhtzABrotpBReqPrdxS6RPSVNU_ySFoR_x9ydcnUy1XSzr3xewyP7uDm16J1F3uk&amp;s=dgijJZ0rZXT0AmbTrb5h3dynVozoiKXzmMn8lUpEpoc&amp;e="><strong>Chart of Note: U.S. food system required greater share of national water use compared to employment or energy use:</strong>  </a>Water, labor, and energy are resources relied upon throughout the U.S. food system. The food system comprehensively required more than a quarter of total U.S. freshwater use each year from 2010 to 2023….In 2023, the U.S. food system relied on 27.7 trillion gallons of freshwater, or 29.3 percent of total freshwater withdrawals.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29402" src="https://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/Screenshot-2026-10-06-130419-560x501.png" alt="" width="560" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></p>
<p>This, of course, explains <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.newsweek.com/the-largest-us-groundwater-supply-is-running-out-11998061">the depletion of the Ogallala aquiver</a>.</p>
<p>Sustainable agriculture anyone?</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/the-food-system-uses-a-lot-of-water/">The food system uses a lot of water</a> appeared first on <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<Img align="left" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt="" style="border:0;float:left;margin:0;padding:0;width:1px!important;height:1px!important;" hspace="0" src="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/i/971628662/0/foodpolitics">
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971628662/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971628662/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971628662/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971628662/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/labor-day-a-food-politics-reminder/">Labor Day: a food politics reminder</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/08/concentration-in-agriculture-2/">Concentration in agriculture: a big problem getting bigger</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/28578/">Do salmon really get high on cocaine? And will you if you eat it?</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29401</post-id></item>
<item>
<feedburner:origLink>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/a-fishy-story-food-fraud-in-the-fisheries-and-aquaculture-sector/</feedburner:origLink>
		<title>A fishy story: Food fraud in the fisheries and aquaculture sector</title>
		<link>https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971505056/0/foodpolitics~A-fishy-story-Food-fraud-in-the-fisheries-and-aquaculture-sector/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 13:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fish]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=29096</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>While I’m thinking about food fraud (see last week’s post), I’ve always said that the fish counter is the wild west of the supermarket.  The Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN would agree. This FAO report:  provides information on tools that can be used to fight food fraud for aquatic products, and international case [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971505056/0/foodpolitics~A-fishy-story-Food-fraud-in-the-fisheries-and-aquaculture-sector/">A fishy story: Food fraud in the fisheries and aquaculture sector</a> appeared first on <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971505056/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971505056/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971505056/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971505056/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;&#160;</div>]]>
</description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I’m thinking about food fraud (see last week’s post), I’ve always said that the fish counter is the wild west of the supermarket.  The Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN would agree.</p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/5a6dbb62-7a45-4c9c-8d64-0b2d241f6fae/content">This FAO report:</a></p>
<blockquote><p> provides information on tools that can be used to fight food fraud for aquatic products, and international case studies illustrate the scope and impact of fraud. The report reviews regulatory frameworks as well as standards such as those set by Codex Alimentarius, FAO guidelines, and GFSI‑benchmarked schemes, advocating for harmonized labelling, mandatory scientific names, and improved traceability. It emphasizes the role of consumer awareness and industry transparency in combating fraud.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, good luck with that.</p>
<p>The report covers these kinds of fraud:</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29097" src="https://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/Screenshot-2026-08-20-113308.png" alt="" width="471" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></p>
<p>There is lots of it:</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29098" src="https://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/Screenshot-2026-08-20-113752-560x541.png" alt="" width="560" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></p>
<p>What can I say?  Know your fish seller.</p>
<p>Caveat emptor!</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/a-fishy-story-food-fraud-in-the-fisheries-and-aquaculture-sector/">A fishy story: Food fraud in the fisheries and aquaculture sector</a> appeared first on <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<Img align="left" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt="" style="border:0;float:left;margin:0;padding:0;width:1px!important;height:1px!important;" hspace="0" src="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/i/971505056/0/foodpolitics">
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971505056/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971505056/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971505056/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971505056/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;&#160;</div>]]>
</content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29096</post-id></item>
<item>
<feedburner:origLink>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/industry-funded-study-of-the-week-2/</feedburner:origLink>
		<title>Industry-funded study of the week: the American Beverage Association at work</title>
		<link>https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971371436/0/foodpolitics~Industryfunded-study-of-the-week-the-American-Beverage-Association-at-work/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 13:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial-sweeteners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflicts-of-interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soft drinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sponsored-research]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=29389</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>A reader and doctoral student in my NYU department, Earlene Cruz, sent this classic example, a press release from the University of Leeds: Major trial examines no-sugar sweetened soft drinks The major new study was published in the British Journal of Nutrition and provides long-term clinical evidence that NNS beverages – specifically those containing aspartame, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971371436/0/foodpolitics~Industryfunded-study-of-the-week-the-American-Beverage-Association-at-work/">Industry-funded study of the week: the American Beverage Association at work</a> appeared first on <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971371436/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971371436/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971371436/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971371436/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/29417/">Industry-funded study of the week: artificially sweetened drinks vs. water</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/29440/">Most studies criticizing the Nova classification of ultra-processed foods are funded by food companies</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/industry-funded-study-of-the-week-dairy-trans-fats/">Industry-funded study of the week: dairy trans fats</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A reader and doctoral student in my NYU department, Earlene Cruz, sent this classic example, a press release from the University of Leeds: <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.leeds.ac.uk/news/article/6033/major-trial-examines-no-sugar-sweetened-soft-drinks"><strong>Major trial examines no-sugar sweetened soft drinks</strong></a></p>
<blockquote><p>The major new study was published in the <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition/article/effect-of-nonnutritive-sweetened-beverages-versus-water-on-body-weight-longterm-results-of-a-randomised-controlled-trial/60CB3ACE5AB706DB882C89E8C1B05318">British Journal of Nutrition</a> and provides long-term clinical evidence that NNS beverages – specifically those containing aspartame, acesulfame potassium (acesulfame K), and sucralose – are equivalent to water in supporting weight loss and long-term weight maintenance.</p></blockquote>
<p>The press release explains the rationale for doing this: “Overall, the results do not support concerns that NNS beverages disrupt appetite regulation or have long term metabolic harm.”</p>
<p>Who would be most interested in debunking this idea?</p>
<p>High marks to the press release for disclosing the funder: The American Beverage Association.</p>
<p>And why would the American Beverage Association care so much?</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Policy impact:</strong> Importantly, the findings directly address <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240073616">recent World Health Organization (WHO) guidance</a>, which advised against using non-sugar sweeteners for weight control due to uncertainty in observational studies. The SWITCH trial provides long-duration, randomised controlled evidence which can be used to inform global guidelines.</p></blockquote>
<p>Isn’t it handy that the results can be used to argue against the WHO’s advisory.</p>
<p>This is one reason why beverage companies and their trade associations invest in research.</p>
<p>I <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition/article/effect-of-nonnutritive-sweetened-beverages-versus-water-on-body-weight-longterm-results-of-a-randomised-controlled-trial/60CB3ACE5AB706DB882C89E8C1B05318">took a look at the study itself</a> and was glad I did.  Check this (my emphasis in red):</p>
<div class="article-wrapper">
<div class="page-component" role="main">
<div id="__nuxt">
<div id="__layout">
<div>
<div data-v-e082f832="">
<div class="container container__modified" data-v-e082f832="">
<div class="row" data-v-e082f832="">
<div class="column__main" data-v-e082f832="">
<div class="row" data-v-e082f832="">
<div class="column__main__left" data-v-e082f832="">
<div id="app-tabs" class="sticky-tabs" data-v-1d90c6ce="" data-v-e082f832="">
<div class="tab-content" tabindex="0" role="region" aria-label="Tab content" data-v-1d90c6ce="">
<div id="article-tab" class="tab-pane active" data-v-efda3ce4="" data-v-1d90c6ce="">
<div class="scrollspy-content" data-spy="scroll" data-target="#toc" data-v-efda3ce4="">
<div id="content-container" class="content-container content-link-accessible" data-v-efda3ce4="">
<div class="content-box">
<div class="article research-article NLM">
<div class="back">
<div id="s7" class="sec funding-statement" data-magellan-destination="s7">
<blockquote>
<p class="A"><strong>Financial support: </strong>This trial was funded by the <span style="color: #ffffff">American Beverage Association.</span> The <span style="color: #ffffff">American Beverage Association w</span>as not involved in the design, conduct, analysis of data or interpretation of this trial; <span style="color: #ff0000">a representative from the American Beverage Association was provided with the opportunity to review the manuscript</span>. Final decisions regarding the content were made by the authors. The manuscript was developed with <span style="color: #ff0000">the assistance of a medical writer, funded by the American Beverage Association</span>, under the direction of the authors. A third-party organisation (Biofortis) audited data at the clinical site to check for the accuracy and integrity of the data.</p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div id="s8" class="sec coi-statement" data-magellan-destination="s8">
<blockquote>
<p class="A"><strong>Competing interests: </strong>Joanne A. Harrold reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the<span style="color: #ff0000"> American Beverage Association</span> for the present study. Outside of the submitted work, she reports a grant from the European Commission for the Horizon 2020 project SWEET. Scott Hill reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the <span style="color: #ff0000">American Beverage Association</span> for the present study. Cristina Radu reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the <span style="color: #ff0000">American Beverage Association</span> for the present study and funding from <span style="color: #ff0000">Coca Cola</span> for a PhD studentship outside of the submitted work. Paul Thomas reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the <span style="color: #ff0000">American Beverage Association</span> for the present study. Paula Thorp reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the <span style="color: #ff0000">American Beverage Association</span> for the present study. Charlotte A. Hardman reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the <span style="color: #ff0000">American Beverage Association</span> for the present study. Outside of the submitted work, she reports honoraria from the <span style="color: #ff0000">International Sweeteners Association, International Food Information Council and Mars Global Nutrition Advisory Council</span> (paid to the University of Liverpool); grants from the European Commission for the Horizon 2020 project SWEET, the Biotechnology &amp; Biological Sciences Research Council and the Natural Environment Research Council (paid to the University of Liverpool); primary supervisor on a PhD studentship funded by <span style="color: #ff0000">Coca Cola (</span>awarded to CR); personal fees for her role on the Food Standards Agency Advisory Committee on Social Sciences and an unpaid role as a trustee of Feeding Liverpool. Paul Christiansen reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the <span style="color: #ff0000">American Beverage Association</span> for the present study. Outside of the submitted work, he reports grants from the European Commission for the Horizon 2020 project SWEET, the National Institute for Health and Care Research, the Home Office UK and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and personal fees from Kaplan and Crohn’s and Colitis UK.</p>
<p class="p">Una Masic reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the <span style="color: #ff0000">American Beverage Association</span> for the present study. Lauren McGale reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the American Beverage Association for the present study. Outside of the submitted work, she reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the WHO, and funding (paid to the University of Wollongong) from the Australian Government’s Department of Health and Aged Care. Daniel J. Cuthbertson reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the<span style="color: #ff0000"> American Beverage Association</span> for the present study. Outside of the submitted work, he reports funding from Novo Nordisk and AstraZeneca for investigator-initiated research and consultancy (paid to the University of Liverpool) and educational grants from Perspectum. Jason C.G. Halford reports funding (paid to the University of Liverpool) from the <span style="color: #ff0000">American Beverage Association</span> for the present study. Outside of the submitted work, he reports a grant from the European Commission for the Horizon 2020 project SWEET; consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Dupont and Mars (all paid to the University of Leeds); honoraria from Novo Nordisk (paid to the University of Leeds); support for attending meetings from Novo Nordisk; financial support for participation in an advisory board for Dupont (paid to the University of Leeds); unpaid participation in an advisory board for the Sweet Tooth Project and unpaid board membership of the European Coalition of People Living with Obesity. He is treasurer of the World Obesity Federation.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>Comment</strong></p>
<p>This is an industry study through and through.  I consider it marketing, not science.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/industry-funded-study-of-the-week-2/">Industry-funded study of the week: the American Beverage Association at work</a> appeared first on <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<Img align="left" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt="" style="border:0;float:left;margin:0;padding:0;width:1px!important;height:1px!important;" hspace="0" src="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/i/971371436/0/foodpolitics">
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971371436/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971371436/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971371436/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971371436/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/29417/">Industry-funded study of the week: artificially sweetened drinks vs. water</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/29440/">Most studies criticizing the Nova classification of ultra-processed foods are funded by food companies</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/industry-funded-study-of-the-week-dairy-trans-fats/">Industry-funded study of the week: dairy trans fats</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29389</post-id></item>
<item>
<feedburner:origLink>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/weekend-reading-science-politics/</feedburner:origLink>
		<title>Weekend reading: Science Politics</title>
		<link>https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971179949/0/foodpolitics~Weekend-reading-Science-Politics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 13:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food-system]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=29384</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>I was asked to write the Foreword to a special issue of Georgetown University’s Science Politics titled “Food Forward.” As its editor, Emily Medenhall, explains, In these essays, the authors consider how food is produced, distributed, purchased, shared, consumed, and experienced. But instead of thinking only about what’s wrong, they think about how to create a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/971179949/0/foodpolitics~Weekend-reading-Science-Politics/">Weekend reading: Science Politics</a> appeared first on <a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971179949/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971179949/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971179949/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971179949/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/weekend-reading-christopher-gardners-food-sense/">Weekend reading: Christopher Gardner&#8217;s Food Sense</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/promoting-a-health-food-system-a-manifesto-from-stuart-gillespie-and-julia-belluz/">Promoting a health food system: A manifesto from Stuart Gillespie and Julia Belluz</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/weekend-re-reading-fast-food-nation/">Weekend (Re-)reading: Eric Schlosser&#8217;s Fast Food Nation</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was asked to write the Foreword to a special issue of Georgetown University’s <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://repository.digital.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/1113030"><em>Science Politics </em>titled “Food Forward.”</a></p>
<p>As its editor, Emily Medenhall, explains,</p>
<blockquote><p>In these essays, the authors consider how food is produced, distributed, purchased, shared, consumed, and experienced.</p>
<p>But instead of thinking only about what’s wrong, they think about how to create a better, safer, and more nourishing world.  By investing in food, we cultivate strong bonds that strengthen families, economies, and the planet.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here’s my Foreword but do read the essays; they are at the link above.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29385" src="https://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/Screenshot-2026-10-04-121113-560x734.png" alt="" width="560" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></p>
<blockquote><p> </p></blockquote>
<p>The post <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/weekend-reading-science-politics/">Weekend reading: Science Politics</a> appeared first on <a href="http://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/t/0/0/foodpolitics/~https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
<Img align="left" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt="" style="border:0;float:left;margin:0;padding:0;width:1px!important;height:1px!important;" hspace="0" src="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/~/i/971179949/0/foodpolitics">
<div style="clear:both;padding-top:0.2em;"><a title="Add to FaceBook" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/2/971179949/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/fbshare20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Add to LinkedIn" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/16/971179949/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/linkedin20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Post to X.com" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/24/971179949/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/x.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&#160;<a title="Subscribe by email" href="https://feeds.feedblitz.com/_/19/971179949/foodpolitics"><img height="20" src="https://assets.feedblitz.com/i/email20.png" style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;"></a>&nbsp;<h3 style="clear:left;padding-top:10px">Related Posts</h3><ul><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/weekend-reading-christopher-gardners-food-sense/">Weekend reading: Christopher Gardner&#8217;s Food Sense</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/10/promoting-a-health-food-system-a-manifesto-from-stuart-gillespie-and-julia-belluz/">Promoting a health food system: A manifesto from Stuart Gillespie and Julia Belluz</a></li><li><a rel="NOFOLLOW" href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/09/weekend-re-reading-fast-food-nation/">Weekend (Re-)reading: Eric Schlosser&#8217;s Fast Food Nation</a></li></ul>&#160;</div>]]>
</content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29384</post-id></item>
</channel></rss>

