The federal appeals court affirmed a ruling by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, holding that defendant Bayada hadn’t made improper deductions from the plaintiffs’ salaries, as paid time off was not part of an employee’s salary under the Department of Labor’s salary basis regulations.
March 17, 2023 at 01:29 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
The U.S. Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit, in a matter of first impression, concluded paid time off was not part of an employee’s salary.
In a March 15 opinion, the appeals court affirmed a ruling by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, holding that defendant Bayada hadn’t made improper deductions from the plaintiffs’ salaries, as paid time off (PTO) was not part of an employee’s salary under the Department of Labor’s salary basis regulations.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Credit: zenzen/Adobe Stock
