Two dissenting justices said the court failed to provide reasoning for sealing the documents in the first place, adding that "we should own up to our mistake and provide statutory and constitutionally satisfactory reasons—if any exist—that justify our continued sealing of the JIRC documents. We have not done so, however, because there are none."
April 25, 2022 at 03:30 PM
5 minute read
In a 4-2 opinion, the Virginia Supreme Court declined to unseal all of the disciplinary records of a Virginia Beach judge who was suspended following an investigation over potential misconduct in her prior position as chairwoman of the Virginia Parole Board.
But in a dissenting opinion, two justices argued that there was no justification for the records to remain hidden from public view.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
