"I wasn't prepared to argue on some of the questions that I thought were extraneous to the record," said Brent Savage of Savage Turner Durham Pinckney.
August 26, 2021 at 02:22 PM
5 minute read
Litigation Reporter
The original version of this story was published on Daily Report Online
Appellate attorneys are opening up about oral argument strategies after a fellow litigator got off to a rocky start before the Supreme Court of Georgia this week.
While arguing in American Civil Liberties Union Inc. v. Zeh, appellee attorney Brent J. Savage, of Savage Turner Durham Pinckney & Savage in Savannah, apologized to the virtual appellate panel for feeling “inadequate to make an argument.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Screenshot of American Civil Liberties Union, Inc. v. Zeh, Supreme Court of Georgia oral arguments of Zoom recording. Aug. 24, 2021.
Chief Justice David Nahmias, Supreme Court of Georgia. (Photo: John Disney/ALM)
