Facing claims YouTube and Google infringed patents asserted by Personalized Media Communications, the team led by Charles Verhoeven and David Perlson opted not to argue that the patents were invalid or unenforceable, but simply that their client didn’t use them.
November 13, 2020 at 07:30 AM
1 minute read
Editor/columnist
We don’t infringe.
That essentially was the simple defense case that Charles Verhoeven and David Perlson of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan put on for Google before a Marshall, Texas jury in U.S. District Chief Judge Rodney Gilstrap’s courtroom.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
David Perlson and Charles Verhoeven with Quinn Emanuel. Courtesy Photos
