The justices held that President Donald Trump's reelection campaign, which was acting as an intervenor in the matter, was pushing for ways to reject ballots that did not appear in the statute.
October 23, 2020 at 05:16 PM
1 minute read
Bureau Chief
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
As litigation over the election in Pennsylvania continues to ramp up, two appeals courts in the state issued opinions on whether ballots can be tossed based for inconsistencies with the signature and whether poll watchers can be allowed at satellite voting sites before Election Day.
The answer to both questions was no.
Deal Watch: Skadden, Sidley, Slaughter and S&C Lead Big Paper Deal, While Private Funds Grow Massive
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Application for mail-in ballot for the 2020 General Election. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
