(Photo: chris2766/Shutterstock.com)
The New Jersey Supreme Court has taken up the question of whether efforts to block plans for an autism group home by residents adjacent to the property implicated the state's anti-discrimination statute.
October 22, 2019 at 01:04 PM
1 minute read
The New Jersey Supreme Court has taken up the question of whether efforts to block plans for an autism group home by residents adjacent to the property implicated the state’s anti-discrimination statute.
The court recently granted a petition for certification in Oasis Therapeutic Centers Inc. v Wade.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
