A Sills Cummis arbitration agreement violated the Rules of Professional Conduct and is unenforceable because it referenced 33 pages of JAMS arbitration rules, yet the client was never given a copy of those rules, the appeals court said.
August 23, 2019 at 05:25 PM
1 minute read
A New Jersey appeals court has overturned an order compelling arbitration of a malpractice suit brought by a former client against Sills Cummis & Gross in Newark.
A Sills Cummis arbitration agreement violated the Rules of Professional Conduct and is unenforceable because it referenced 33 pages of JAMS arbitration rules, yet the client was never given a copy of those rules, the appeals court said in Delaney v. Dickey on Friday.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
