Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of information on voting behavior and electoral outcomes: An experimental study of direct legislation

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

This paper reports on the use of laboratory experiments to identify the effect of information on voting behavior and electoral outcomes in the direct legislation environment. I showed that when incompletely informed voters know that the setter has paid a certain amount to contest an election, they can use this information to increase the likelihood that they cast the same votes they would have cast had they possessed complete information. As a consequence of the way voter strategies were affected by information, the likelihood that the “incomplete information” electoral outcome was the same as the electoral outcome that would have been chosen by a completely informed electorate increases, as does the responsiveness of direct legislation outcomes to “complete information” voter preferences.

While this research does not resolve long standing questions about the responsiveness of democratic institutions, it does add to what we understand about responsiveness by demonstrating conditions under which incompletely informed voters can generate the electoral outcomes that they would have if better informed. This research also informs the debate about the use of the referendum and initiative to determine policy. My answer to the question: “Is direct legislation is a useful mechanism for obtaining policy outcomes that correspond to the “will of the majority” or is it a way for small, wealthy interest groups to subvert the “popular will,”” is that direct legislation can be both. When voters are badly informed (or the electoral alternatives are reasonably complex), and there are no effective information cues available, small groups who have enough resources to obtain agenda control can use direct legislation to obtain preferred outcomes. When meaningful cues are available (or the effect of electoral alternatives are easy to understand), then direct legislation can be useful tool for the implementation of majority-preferred policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Collier, K.E., McKelvey, R.D., Ordeshook, P.C. and Williams, K.C. (1987). Retrospective voting: An experimental study.Public Choice 53: 101–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, R. and Wilson, R. (1990, March). Voting as a public bad: Theoretical and experimental results on voting costs. Mimeo, presented at the Western Political Science Association Meetings.

  • Kreps, D.M. and Wilson, R. (1982). Sequential equilibria.Econometrica 50: 863–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupia, A, (1994). Short cuts versus endorsements: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections.American Political Science Review, Forthcoming.

  • Lupia, A. (1992). Busy voters, agenda control and the power of information.American Political Science Review 86: 390–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R.D. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1984). Rational expectations in electons: Some experimental results based on a multidimensional model.Public Choice 44: 61–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R.D. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1985). Sequential elections with limited information.American Journal of Political Science 29: 480–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, T. and Rosenthal, H. (1978). Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo.Public Choice 33: 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, T. and Rosenthal, H. (1979). The elusive median voter.Journal of Public Economics 7: 143–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I thank Richard McKelvey and Peter Ordeshook for continuous support and advice and Leopold Travis for programming assistance. Comments made by Rick Wilson, Tom Palfrey and Randy Calvert were also very helpful. Funding for this project was provided by the National Science Foundation and the Division of Humanities and Social Sciences at the California Institute of Technology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lupia, A. The effect of information on voting behavior and electoral outcomes: An experimental study of direct legislation. Public Choice 78, 65–86 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053366

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053366

Keywords

Navigation