Reality on the ground
Amjad Abu Kush, an activist from Rafah, said that only those who benefit from Hamas welcomed the documentary, while many Palestinians in Gaza ridiculed it — as well as Al Jazeera's role in the war itself. He said the network has exaggerated Hamas' military power, arguing that this is used as a “winning card” to continue Qatar’s role “in guarding and containing” Hamas in coordination with the United States.
Abu Kush pointed to an April statement from the Qatar Embassy in Washington — in response to criticism from a U.S. Representative — reminding that "mediation role exists only because we were asked by the U.S. in 2012 to play this role since, regrettably, Israel and Hamas refuse to speak to each other directly."
The documentary is unlikely to change the reality on the ground.
Karim Joudah, an activist from the northern town of Jabaliya who is sheltering in Rafah, also ridiculed the documentary, saying that people from Gaza are pro-occupied by the harsh living conditions of the past seven months. Most people don't have electricity or internet to look at Facebook posts and documentaries; “Those who have an internet connection are lucky,” he said.
Palestinian writer and researcher Karim Abu Al-Rous, who is from Rafah, said that Al Jazeera is trying to restore Sinwar's popular legitimacy, but that the documentary is unlikely to change the reality on the ground. People in Gaza see him "as the one controlling the fate of the war, whether it continues or ends, whether a hostage exchange will happen or not," he said.
Palestinians walk on a street in Deir al-Balah in the central Gaza Strip.
Abed Rahim Khatib/dpa/ZUMA
Vague rhetoric
Beyond questions over Al Jazeera's influence and the documentary's goal, a recent speech by Qassam Brigades spokesman Abu Obeida has sparked larger questions about Hamas. “Suddenly, 200 days later, the barbaric Nazi army is still stuck in the sands of Gaza without a goal or a horizon,” Abu Obeida said in a speech on April 13.
He used vague terms such as “the nation” and “the free people of the world,” rather than directing his speech to the so-called “home front,” the people of Gaza. And he praised Iran’s attack on Israel, saying it “set new rules, established important equations, and confused the calculations of the enemy and those behind it.”
We lost hope in the movement in 2014.
That same day, the Israeli army posted a picture showing members of its Nahal Brigade having fun at a large luncheon held near the Netzarim Corridor, which divides Gaza into north and south. The troops didn’t show any sign of fear, something that the people of Gaza are well aware of.
Joudah said that speeches like Abu Obeida's have become a subject of sarcasm among Palestinians in Gaza. “We see that the army, which did not leave an inch in the Gaza Strip, suddenly became stuck,” he said. “The reality on the ground says that the army is present in the center of the Strip, and its outskirts from all directions. It can enter at any moment it decides to enter.”
Worldcrunch 🗞 Extra!
Know more • The voices expressed in this Daraj article reflect certain trends observed by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR), which has been polling sentiment in Gaza. In its most recent survey of Palestinians in the enclave, conducted in early March, it found support for Hamas as a political party has fallen to 34%, from 42% in December 2023 and 38% in September 2023, just before the start of the war.
Still, satisfaction with Hamas’s conduct of the war remained stable (at 62%), as did the role played by Yahya Sinwar (52%). Some 52% believe the return of Hamas is the most realistic post-war scenario, and 59% prefer that scenario. The PSR noted that “given the magnitude of the suffering in the Gaza Strip, this seems to be the most counter-intuitive finding of the poll. Nonetheless, it is consistent with the increase in the percentage of Gazans who think Hamas will win the current war”: 56% said Hamas would emerge victorious over Israel, up from 50% in December.
— Rebecca Bonthius
*Read more about Worldcrunch — and our unique recipe for international journalism.
Unanswered questions
Wadah Abu Jama, a Palestinian poet from Gaza City, said the majority of Hamas government employees managed to get their families out of Gaza; only those who can’t afford the costs of survival remain in this "open prison," he said.
Any talk from Hamas directed at the domestic audience will be ridiculed.
He rejects claims of steadfast support for Hamas and resistance, pointing to the more than 100,000 people who have left Gaza, and the tens of thousands others who are waiting to do so, “not out of weakness or defeat, but because they realize that they are dying and sacrificing for nothing."
“Palestinians in Gaza no longer tolerate sacrificing their children, homes and or lives for the sake of Iran — for lifting sanctions on its funds or improving its position in the nuclear agreements,” he said.
The people of Gaza still remember the 2014 war, when Hamas leaders decided to end fighting based on the same conditions that were sent in the first week of the war. “We lost hope in the movement,” said Abu Jama.
Abu Kush, too, said that people have “completely lost confidence in everything the movement says. Any talk from Hamas directed at the domestic audience will be ridiculed.”
Yet for the people of Gaza, several questions remain: Why are we being killed now? What's the reason? If we are in a liberation battle, what are its features? Who ordered the Oct. 7 attack? And with their home territory having become unlivable, what future if any remains for Gaza.
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
