PAUL SMITH

Smith: Alewife hit a record low in Lake Michigan in 2017

Paul A. Smith
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
The estimated biomass of forage fish in Lake Michigan shows a significant decline in recent decades. The 2017 total forage fish biomass estimate was fourth lowest on record, according bottom trawls conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey.

SHEBOYGAN - The biomass of prey fish in Lake Michigan – including alewife, the key forage for chinook salmon – continues to sag to or near record lows, prompting questions about trout and salmon stocking strategies by state agencies around the lake.

"The (Lake Michigan) picture looks very similar to what Lake Huron was like before it crashed," said Chuck Madenjian of the U.S. Geological Survey. "And nobody was prepared for how quickly it went over there."

Madenjian presented a report titled "Status and Trends of Prey Fish in Lake Michigan, 2017" Saturday at a meeting of the Wisconsin Federation of Great Lakes Sport Fishing Clubs.

It was the first public showing of the data obtained last year through bottom trawling and acoustic surveys.

Since 1973, scientists have used bottom trawls as the primary means to estimate the populations of adult forage fish in the lake. Acoustic surveys, conducted since 1992, are better at detecting young-of-the-year fish.

This slide shows the seven areas used for bottom trawls on Lake Michigan, as well as the relative alewife biomass caught in 2017.

The sampling is performed annually at seven index sites, including Port Washington.

The 2017 bottom trawling data showed a total lake-wide prey fish biomass of 13.3 kilotonnes, fourth-lowest on record. The four lowest totals have come in the last four years.

Bloater chub had the highest biomass, 9.13 kilotonnes, followed by deepwater sculpin (2.75), rainbow smelt (0.62) and round goby (0.52).

Significant to sport anglers, alewife biomass was 0.09 kilotonnes, lowest ever recorded in the bottom trawl.

Biomass of adult alewife in Lake Michigan has declined significantly in recent decades according to bottom trawl surveys conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey.

Madenjian said the lake's forage fish were undergoing a double whammy of top-down and bottom-up effects.

Not only are predator fish eating the smaller fish, but other organisms, principally quagga mussels, have limited the amount of food available for forage fish.

The age structure of the lake's alewife population is truncated, Madenjian said, with no fish older than 5 caught in the 2017 survey. Age 1 and 2 alewives dominated the catch.

This graph shows the age distribution of alewife caught by bottom trawl on Lake Michigan, with no fish over the age of 5 seen in 2017.

Acoustic data showed the 2017 year class of alewife to be down from the previous year and 26% of the long-term average. For alewife of all ages, acoustic data found the alewife biomass to be fifth lowest on record, Madenjian said.

The trend is not new. Since invasive dreissenid mussels entered the lake in the 1990s, plankton levels have dropped, the water has cleared and the biomass of forage fish has declined.

State agencies have responded with trout and salmon stocking cuts, which so far appear to have helped balance the number of predator and prey fish in the lake.

In 2016, at the urging of the Lake Michigan Commitee of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois and Indiana agreed to cut the number of fish, principally chinook, they planted in the lake.

Wisconsin differed from the other states by cutting brown trout by 50% but holding chinook level. The other states opted to reduce plants of chinook, which rely most heavily on alewife.

The coming years will tell if the strategy, lobbied for by the Wisconsin Lakeshore Business Association (largely composed of charter captains), was prudent.

It has already been heavily criticized by many Wisconsin sport anglers and some fisheries managers for cutting brown trout so heavily. The Wisconsin waters of Lake Michigan have earned a reputation as a world-class brown trout fishery. Further, brown trout eat a more varied diet than chinook and are more likely to survive a potential crash of alewife.

Data are expected to be available in the coming weeks on 2017 predator-prey ratio and the condition of salmon in the lake.

Chuck Madenjian, senior scientist with the U.S. Geological Survey, presented results of the 2017 Lake Michigan forage fish studies at a meeting of the Wisconsin Federation of Great Lakes Sport Fishing Clubs in Sheboygan.

Fisheries managers are scheduled to review the data March 19-22 in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario.

The Wisconsin DNR has not decided whether to adjust its stocking targets for future years, according to Brad Eggold, Great Lakes District Fisheries Supervisor.

Eggold said Wisconsin and the other state and tribal agencies on Lake Michigan will receive the latest information, including the weight of female age 3 fish returning to weirs, at the March meeting. 

"Once all the information is collected, Wisconsin along with the other agencies will discuss whether changes to stocking levels will be recommended for 2019," Eggold said. "Right now, state agencies are completing stocking adjustments, recommended in 2016, in an effort to match the available prey with these important salmon and trout species.” 

The first Wisconsin stocking in 2018 is planned in March, when yearling brown trout and coho salmon are planted.

Tagging change: To help control costs, Eggold said changes will be implemented this year in the coded wire tag (CWT) program in Wisconsin.

For 2018, all lake trout and rainbow trout planted in the Wisconsin waters of Lake Michigan will receive a CWT. In addition, chinook salmon stocked in Racine and Kewaunee will get a tag.

Chinook stocked elsewhere will get just an adipose fin clip.

In previous years, all chinook stocked in state waters received one of the tiny tags. Fish in the CWT mass marking program are tagged in a portable trailer provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.