We find contributing in Your Articles adil especially the one concerning our related field is a welcomed idea. i believe i have participated in all the suggested sent articles from you as we all find a benefit of sharing Vertexfx news that is already known to the public in our website , however apology if i missed any.

and always welcoming sharing VertexFX news through you.

I am finding out from my contact at the OSC. Will reply back to you soon

There are many examples of indirect fallout / collateral damage. Remember when CFTC first banned non US forex dealers from offering retail forex trading to US residents? At first, many of the larger brokers insisted “We are not governed by US law….this wont affect us. We can still accept US residents as normal”. Almost all of those same brokers FOLDED to the CFTC pressure. They either blocked US ip addresses, removed USA as an option to select country on the registration form, and/or kicked out existing clients that resided in the US.

The online poker debacle was another good example: confiscated domain names, frozen accounts, etc and the big poker rooms all folded to the pressure. But state-run lotteries are never a problem of course.

Anyway, bitcoin and cryptocurrences like it are perhaps the best thing going right now. So law enforcement cannot just take down an entire service just because of a few bad apples. They will have to put down their donuts and actually trap the bad apples, and leave the rest of the apples alone.

The LR domino was pushed over and then any other dominos in the path also fall. It’s not a matter of who started it.

- can there be a certain % of trades that are rolled over but can still be exempted from the rule “Currency exchange contracts provided that the contract settles within prescribed timelines, is intended by the counterparties to be settled by delivery of the currency referenced in the contract, and is not rolled-over.” Is a day trader who closes their position out before rollover time also not considered a qualifying derivative?

I contacted vertexfx providers and they seem to be helpful and so I started developing plugins for traders whom using vertexfx. It’s quite interesting because of the fact that this platform seem to be responsive to every idea i come up with. A lot of features including which generate news ideas every now and then.

For MQ, I several times contacted them for ideas to be developed but needs some tweaks from their side for my ideas to work, and later I find them developing my ideas. I mean what the…

Imagine a dealer actually having to give each client the exact same trading conditions on the same account type? Does that mean no more virtual dealer plugin?